Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The TD06H and 12cm combo would not be an all out performer in terms of response..

I have emailed Kando advising them I recommend an open-rear internal gate T3 10cm rear housing for their turbos. He seemed to like the idea, but I would not recommend you hold your breath.

TD06SL2-20G with 8cm housing is a known good thing on an RB20.

Roy has used a TD06-20G to make 260rwkw. The SL2 wheel is cropped variant so is a little lighter and produces a little more power. Roy noted earlier than he saw little difference between a couple of variants yet I believe there could have been more variables to consider.

SR20s generally run an 8cm SL2 20G and produce good results. While I think an SR is a better flowing motor than an RB (especially a 20), I think the RB20 will still produce a good result for the said option.

8cm housings can be had with both 3 bolt trust style housings OR silvia specific T518Z housings. Be it myself I would be buying a TD05H-18G with T518Z housing, internal gate and running a T3 to T2 adapter on the RB20 with a custom dump pipe. I think that would give 240rwkw with some real rip.

Roy has used a TD06-20G to make 260rwkw ... SR20s generally run an 8cm SL2 20G and produce good results. While I think an SR is a better flowing motor than an RB (especially a 20), I think the RB20 will still produce a good result for the said option.

I've never seen a bone stock internal SR20DET make 260+kw on pump fuel?! From my experience, even calling an SR20 better flowing than an RB20 is quite a stretch, let alone RBs in general. Using how SR20s go with a particular turbo would more accurately be what minimum power figure to expect with an RB20, but also bear in mind RB20s low down/midrange tend to be lazier for a given peak power than an SR20.

I've never seen a bone stock internal SR20DET make 260+kw on pump fuel?! From my experience, even calling an SR20 better flowing than an RB20 is quite a stretch, let alone RBs in general. Using how SR20s go with a particular turbo would more accurately be what minimum power figure to expect with an RB20, but also bear in mind RB20s low down/midrange tend to be lazier for a given peak power than an SR20.

RB20 will happily spin all day every day to 8000+rpm in stock form... See how many times you can do that in a SR :)

You may be a few hundred rpm back down low but 1000+rpm up top

I've never seen a bone stock internal SR20DET make 260+kw on pump fuel?! From my experience, even calling an SR20 better flowing than an RB20 is quite a stretch, let alone RBs in general. Using how SR20s go with a particular turbo would more accurately be what minimum power figure to expect with an RB20, but also bear in mind RB20s low down/midrange tend to be lazier for a given peak power than an SR20.

could post around 20 or so 280-300rwkw graphs of unopened sr's. Peak power between rb20 and sr20 is generally the same but we need to run more boost to get it... rb20 is also lazier onto boost but you have the extra rpm to use it... just need to wind in more boost to keep the numbers climbing

could post around 20 or so 280-300rwkw graphs of unopened sr's. Peak power between rb20 and sr20 is generally the same but we need to run more boost to get it... rb20 is also lazier onto boost but you have the extra rpm to use it... just need to wind in more boost to keep the numbers climbing

Thats interesting, with completely stock engines (including cams etc) the SR20s I have seen here seem to usually hit a wall at around 220kw or so on 98 if you are going to be sensible about boost while RB20s will happily venture past 250kw. Psi for psi the RB20s usually seem to have it (ie, outright engine flow). I am more curious about how my flatmates S14 track car will go, now - I had assumed we would need E85 and a healthy dose of boost to give it a little madness.

damnit posted wrong one. >_<

meant this one..

Kinugawa Turbocharger 3" Nissan RB25DET R33 TD06H-20G

http://www.ebay.com....=item415a2b0948

what power you after? i've never used one... but cant imagine it being a dog. I have however used a few internal gate l2 variants and they sucked hard.

yeah I,ve been told to go external sl2..

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290575800499&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

dunno 250-280 with boost by 3500

cant find any dynos at all on 25s though just a few comments saying they,re ok. and awesome on rb20s..

and a couple of old dynos that looked at bit slow onto power..

what power you after? i've never used one... but cant imagine it being a dog. I have however used a few internal gate l2 variants and they sucked hard.

Sucked in what way? Please elaborate as me and Arthur are both considering venturing down the TD06SL2 20G 10cm road with our 2.5s

Also, Lith, NS.com has quite a few upper 200 SL2 powered SR20s noting minimal modifications. Roy has seen 260 out of his camed example RB20 and seems to be searching HARD for more. There is also very limited example of 20g comps doing more than that on RB25s on this forum. Youtube exhibits Jap 20g SR's and 1JZ's at 400ps on hub dynos. I will note that the said SR's dont plot any worse than 300kw RB25.

Anyway, this isnt SR20forum.com so forget I mentioned it and no hard feelings about my fabled SR you will probably never see :P

hi trent, yeah if you could email the dyno sheets to me that would be awsome. send them to tek@gigabitcomputers.com.au . thanks. ill be ringing you soo to bring the car back in, ive done some more work on some of the things we talked about, fixed the top pipe(moved it away from the turbo), sort out injectors, ive gone up to a permaseal MLS exhaust gasket, ARP exhaust studs, getting the broken stud sorted, im also moving the AFM into the cooler piping, and going to run 4" into the turbo. still hunting down some rims... 2 many options, so this time round when i bring it in, i think we will look at maybe hitting up 22psi? if you happy to tune it up to that and hopefully we can make a decent improvement, up around 280rwkw would be nice :D. Also, do you think i should look at a bigger fuel pump? i have a walbro 255l/h atm, i was thinking about changing to a dual entry fuel rail, and running a 330l/h fuel pump and rising rate regulator and going up to 800cc injectors. do you think its necessary for the power im aiming at? or is what ive got sufficient.

cheers.

Got mine tuned today :)

t67dyno.jpg?t=1308909591

t67boost.jpg?t=1308909571

t67r.jpg?t=1307875616

333kw

More in it but settled here due to injectors near max and valve springs getting loose up top.

Gotta take it for a decent drive before i say too much about how it drives and if i will push for more. Sounds CRAZY!!!! on boost :)

t67-25g

6boost

tial 44mm

freedy plenum

z32 in cooler piping

power FC

profec B II

740cc highflowed stock injectors

bosch 044

3" exhaust

Adjustable EX cam gear

exceedy 5 puk clutch (gonna have to get a twin plate i think!!)

E85 (trent tested it at E65) springvale stuff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like the rack seals blew.
    • ^ This is all good advice. I can imagine that there's some passive components in the HVAC controller that run that PWM output that could die, or suffer bad solder joints. It can be worth opening it up, taking a schmooze around looking for swollen electro caps, evidence of liquid escape anywhere, tracks that have been hot, lifted, cracked, etc. A DMM might not be suitable for seeing if the PWM output is pulsing. Might be too fast and too low voltage for a DMM to keep up. An analogue voltmeter might give a better hope. I use a handheld oscilloscope (<$100 from Aliexpress if you want something cheap). A DMM might see the voltage across the motor flicker. Otherwise, as above. If you can successfully see PWM action, then the control side should be good. If you can't see it with what you have, you might need to step up the instrumentation used, as above. Beyond that, and dbm7's advice on testing the motor directly, you're down to looking for broken wires, corroded connector pins, etc.
    • So Thanks for the comments etc. To follow up on this, we went down the path of fitting a divider down the middle of the external pipe that was added to the exhaust manifold and the divider went from very close to the external wastegate all the way up to the "V" part where the pipes from each side of the manifold joined. After this modification it was finally in a position to do the dyno-tune with some degree of success. Top end power was down about 10kw (250rwkw down to 240rwkw) I believe from previous but it seems to be more responsive lower down and at least it is now driveable and fun and back on the road to be enjoyed. Apparently the timing couldn't be run the same as it was running into knock and boost was down about 1psi. For all we know this could have been from the fuel being a bit older, or perhaps some slight complication from the new head gasket as we didn't have compression figures from before that mod to compare. I'm no mechanic and this is second hand info but I just wanted to follow-up to those that commented or read the original post with interest. After so many months of stuffing around this is a big win. The interesting part was most of the info around this was gained from information around Barra motors and not GTR as the manifold setup on the Barra with single turbo was more similar.  Thanks for those that helped with info. Regards Rob 
    • G'day ... first up, I very much doubt that's a resistor network (as used also for this job), but the part# looks right. The description of 'power module assembly' looks to be nissanese for 'PWM driven, ground switched, DC motor speed controller'.... the circuit in the schematic kinda infers that's the case... ...with the transistor symbol appearing in the unit described here as 'Fan Control Amp(lifier)'....being driven by pin20 on the HVAC unit,  and a feedback signal on pin19 from the motor negative terminal for some reason (might be motor fault detection, maybe they detect commutator switching to determine motor revs as well, I dunno)... but if they are  counting commutator spikes, a bad segment (or really worn brushes) will throw a spanner in the works... The motor itself will as said be brushed DC with segmented commutator, rated at 12VDC nominally ~ now-a-days I just unplug them, determine the positive wire, and hook them up to a variable power supply and find out how much current they draw, if they work etc etc ...you can also check for bad segments...ie; set the power supply up to feed 1volt @ 2amp max, then watch the wattage count as you slowly rotate the fan blower motor through a complete revolution ; any bad/dead segments will be clearly evident...some folks would just say determine the positive wire, and feed it battery voltage, and if fan spin, you've got a win...<grin>... well, at least that infers it should do something when plugged back in, and the HVAC unit commands it to run... and if it doesn't, you suspect the module, but you should check the PWM signal on pin20 is actually present, and if it is, blame the module ...  
    • Ah. OK. I take it back. I hadn't looked closely at the R33/4 arms and presumed that GKTech did as GKTech do everywhere else, which is to use sphericals there. The poly bushings are made to be 100% interchangeable, should use the standard bolt just fine. Every other bush in every other place in pretty much every other car, does.
×
×
  • Create New...