Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nah was a t28! lol

but thats my point its good to see how it ramps on/power curve with certain peoples setups etc etc etc

My cars torque was OVER NINE THOUSDANDDDDDDDD

Just wanted to belong :wave:

Hypergear has mentioned in the past that testing on port covers proved that the a minor amount of response was lost and it required more boost to make the same power.

Surge point was obviously shifted and his recommendation was to only run a surge housing when required.

Yeah i did mention maybe its just the difference between the two dyno's making them appear to be delivering differing reults.

Im not complaining in anyway, once i can get back to the dyno and put 20psi in it i should reach my goal of 400rwhp.

hmm so meth made 330 ish rwkw on 24 psi with e85 ? i got 311 on 19 with 98 would like to see number with e85 and boostin it up just for coupple power runs see see if i can get close to the number being ran on the hubs

switched over to normal .7 front housing this morning :) completey different 2 drive now, even faster spool, 1.2bar boost ( gate pressure atm ) by 4000rpm in 4th rolling at 80kmph.

330kw on pump 98 is easy done, i use to run 28psi thru a 3582r on bp98 tune before this turbo and made 480rwhp, was a very safe tune.

also realised vct wasnt switched on, got new map sent over email earlier and now vct is on, this thing is responsive :)

Edited by methz

no surge noticed yet, with anti surge housing i noticed it slightly in 3rd at low rpm ramping onto boost.. going 4 a drive tnite 2 see how surge goes, time 2 wind the boost back into it.

new cover + vct setup correctly, its like a dif setup, comes on boost so much better and harder.

Edited by methz

Just a quick question, have been reading this thread but havn't exactly found what im looking for.

Basically, im wanting to buy a TD06 20G for my R33 skyline, im not sure if i should go anti surge front housing or non anti surge? i have heard the anti surge makes less power and not as responsive etc whereas the non anti surge makes more HP and is still a proven performer if tuned right etc?

specs on car if wanted:

Stock RB25 engine

s/s highmount

38mm tial gate, 1 bar spring

740cc injectors

freddy plenum

80mmThrottle body

exhaust

greddy digital boost controller

fmic

looking forward to your replies!!

A Freddy plenum isn't really going to help much either..the stock one can handle anything a td06 20g can throw at it....probably make better torque too..also if you get the right ecu you won't need a boost controller ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...