Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo


SimonR32

Recommended Posts

I only mentioned the 6 bolt outlet as an option as we are considering costs. staying 6 bolt will mean 1 less thing you need to change, hey HG regularly makes all the options with simple V band outlets or similar.

PM Stao about a price, it may be better than whats on the site.

For 220-240kw I personally dont think the T04E would be on the marker for performance, which is why im making the recommendation I am (and believe in it so strongly). If you were aiming for upper 200s it would possibly be worth the gamble. I do have faith that there still is a place for the T04E in the market, yet not many people will agree.

If you havent read I own an SR with an SS1PU which produced a respectable result, within what your actually looking for. Being an SR the result wouldnt be identical, but you should get a reasonable idea. Jez also tuned an SS1PU on an RB20 with the stock log manifold and made an easy 225kw from memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i'm a little confused too Roy, the date on the paper is same date I got mine tuned yet neither graph looks to be mine, as mine seems to fall somewhere inbetween the pink and blue....its actually closer to the pink but with a bit more boost and im topping out earlier..Im wondering if the standard manifold is helping create a little more torque in my midrange as well..

and why is Staos car 10kms slower at 6060rpm??

:rofl:

different car look at folder name, unbelievably i did two that day i think it was Harris's car. i will check.

575070_10151619830610693_713727934_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, if you want cheap and goodv i have a new kando td05h-18g...will make the power you are after and be pretty mega respoinsive. you just need to buy bthe exhaust housing fo $150 and you have a $600 brand new turbo to givev fabricator to mount gate on housinhg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

its Staos billet t67. Artz i only changed because im wanted to go highmount, was jealous of everyone elses exotic exhaust notes at the track lol. was goin to use the 20g but i cbf with water lines plus another 50wkw wouldn't hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they run the same core and bearings. materials etc as Trust turbos? Its like people that say you dont need to run coolant lines to the turbo even if they have them. I feel the designed built the turbo with the expectation that 90deg water temp woudl be flowing though the core so selected materials, tolerances etc to suit the coolant and the oil.

My turbo has now done almost 70,000kms over 9 years and it was a second hand turbo off a friends 9sec Jap GTR. No problems with it. If you can get that sort of reliabbility ouot of them then AWESOME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol easy now.

im not suggesting that the kando will be as good as the trust item. It may be, or may not be. No one knows.

I'm just saying that in theory the Trust items do fine without as has Simon, so I would not be fearful of running an oil only core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well. while engine's running, oil washes the bearings and shaft all times which takes the heat away. So the bearings are not much hotter then the actual engine oil. The only reason bush bearings are made out of brass or browns and some in aluminium is because it doesn't stick or rust together with the steel shaft and bearing housing. None of the BB or bush turbos trailed on my car has been water cooled, Both me and Trent thrash the crap out of them on high boost as a part of testing, and I have not seen one fail.

Garrett BB must be water cooled, but not all BB require water cooling, it depends on the bearings how the setup of the chra system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol easy now.

im not suggesting that the kando will be as good as the trust item. It may be, or may not be. No one knows.

I'm just saying that in theory the Trust items do fine without as has Simon, so I would not be fearful of running an oil only core.

LOL, sorry. Was that too strongly worded? Sorry :( Trying to type fast before I get cauight playing on net vs working :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its Staos billet t67. Artz i only changed because im wanted to go highmount, was jealous of everyone elses exotic exhaust notes at the track lol. was goin to use the 20g but i cbf with water lines plus another 50wkw wouldn't hurt.

Since this is about TDxx related thread so I will post all TDxx related results here including the turbochargers that we've built.

The ATRSL25.5 (HG re-engineered T67), just maxed out at 399rwkws on mine with stock cams. Tried every thing to get that extra 1kws to crack 400 and it just won't do it. Still the highest on Trent's library for stock headed Rb25det.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Looks laggy but it is very fast on the road. How ever for a street car the ATR43SS2 and ATRSL20.5 is a better performer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10cm turbine. I originally wanted 400rwkws out of this within usual rev range. So it is on the large end. I'm building one more in 66mm, which should drop it back to around 380rwkws mark before 7000RPMs while gain 200RPMs of response. Alternatively have a look at the new roller bearing G3 and SS2 see if that is a better turbo for what you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 goddamn kw, you must be shaking your fists at the clouds above... :rofl:..

Still to make it at 6600rpm is amazing ..who ever thought 20yrs on the humble RB25 would still be cranking those sort of numbers..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...