Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nice. After my playing with turbos I was just going to go with my one but went T67 just so I could baseline my results against others as I am still not sure about the performance of my new kinder surprise engine. I have said this before but this time will follow through. Need to get my car over to you for a few runs so I can understand whether its far off what a T67 setup can do,

I am making 325rwklws at 18psi falling to 16psi from about 5,500rpm onwards. After PI am going to make a few changes then will give it a few runs. Feels pretty healthy at 16psi and will be pretty easy on the engien and the track...also a little easier on the RB20 box

its all good, i know what its like, i have a similar list of things i never get done :P just let me know in advance and we will do whatever we can to help out.

That isn't flash! What setup, assuming stock SR20 with bolton internal unit? How much boost, was that maxed out? Looking at one for that kind of setup....

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

STD 1988 laurel RB20 @ 19psi wont make anymore no matter what @ 19psi... @ 23psi today it made 245kw but id prefer to leave it at 19 psi... was hoping for 250 @ 19psi but impossible. the HKS GT2535 had alot more topend... but laggier.

dont get me wrong area under the curve is great and it drives well, but car has full comp grip setup and 230-240kw is struggle town on new semis at drift days.

post-34927-0-73198900-1367748464_thumb.jpg

Ok so i just had my rb20 tuned with adjustable cam gears td05 18g. He is saying that the boost is spiking to 22 psi and then dropping to 18psi. I was wondering if its the gate that could be doing this. Its just making 190kw and thats just not enough for me.

I do have a cheaper vband gate on there swapping it to a turbosmart.

I have 750cc e85 injectors bad idea if i just go e85

Can anyone help

I've done a TD05-18G on an SR from Kando, which works well. Has done a couple of tens of thousand K's since install and countless beatings.

Holds 16psi well with a minor tapper.

The TD05H-18G gives reasonable down low with a sudden surge onto good power at the 3700 mark. Motor is an SRDE non VCT. VCT models would do better in terms of spool character.

Back to this - after much umming and ahhing the PE1420 from a certain S14 is going to be replaced with a Kando TD05-16G, T25 internally gated with the 3" intake housing and will fabricate to suit. Will be interesting to see how that performs :)

Back to this - after much umming and ahhing the PE1420 from a certain S14 is going to be replaced with a Kando TD05-16G, T25 internally gated with the 3" intake housing and will fabricate to suit. Will be interesting to see how that performs :)

A birdy told me that one of our SAU commoners saw 300+ at the hubs from his stock E9 turbo on 25psi (TD05HR-16G6 for those unawares).

I am also in talks with Stao to consider a high flow small inducer turbo for my own SR, the thought itself came from the 16G6 wheel which is a 50 trim 68mm wheel :) Thus I will be very keen to see your said 16G6 results also. Don't be shy with the boost though! It should be great.

  • Like 1

I know people who have done ~300kw @ hubs from stock EVO 9 turbos as well, as well as EVO3 16Gs with the bigger comp and turbine housings. We are going the non-EVO fit EVO3 spec 16G with 8cm housing so I'm picking we'll be able to make some decent power. The car only has a 2.5bar sensor so we can't get too carried away with boost, but I am sure we'll still get OK results :)

Sounds mickey mouse. On E85 the sensor shouldn't hold you back too much, safety margins will be in place from the fuel alone to let you push beyond the absolute MAP reading.

Looking forward to seeing what its got. Hopefully big spool and 300+ at the hubs.

Its a stock engine, with a stock gearbox, and a track car which had more power than braking/traction last time it was out so pushing the turbo to it's limit right at the start (we've already maxed out and popped a PE1420 lol) is not the highest priority :P It will make more than enough power on 18-20psi at this stage. When the VE head goes on things will get more interesting ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...