Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AH. You must have got given the non-ported version. The ported one is 34mm.

As reference my SS1PU is 29mm. Fingers crossed for Saturday.

Success - strangely it holds ~.9-1bar of boost on wastegate boost, which is more like what we expected in the first place. Mysterious, but at least it's sorted now :)

Qu O/T.

has anyone used a kando turbine housing (like the ones below) on a garrett gt30 based turbo?

http://shopping.kinugawaturbo.com/turbinehousingkinugawagarrettgt3037gt3076rgt3071rgt30rar618cm.aspx

if so, what were the results and what are your thoughts on the quality?

would you think the A/R 8cm is too small for a 2.0L 4-cyl twin-cam engine?

thanks.

Qu O/T.

has anyone used a kando turbine housing (like the ones below) on a garrett gt30 based turbo?

http://shopping.kinugawaturbo.com/turbinehousingkinugawagarrettgt3037gt3076rgt3071rgt30rar618cm.aspx

if so, what were the results and what are your thoughts on the quality?

would you think the A/R 8cm is too small for a 2.0L 4-cyl twin-cam engine?

thanks.

It doesnt fit the good gt30's any way 56t / 84 version is the way to go.

It doesnt fit the good gt30's any way 56t / 84 version is the way to go.

yes it does.

- Turbine wheel Spec : 84 Trim / 60.0 Major / 55.0 mm Exducer

- There are three types of GT3071R turbine wheel. This housing can not fit 56.5mm/trim 84 nor 56.5mm/trim 90 turbine wheel.

And this is with Link boost control turned off on the dyno, so just wastegate boost:

attachicon.gifMaxInj.png

And an interesting update since the boost creep issue has been pretty much sorted, couldn't do 3rd gear because of lack of traction (??!!!!) on 18psi - even 4th getting a bit skatey (it's around 0 degrees here tonight)... decent spool even on 80% throttle though:

post-11136-0-68171000-1373537973_thumb.png

yes it does.

- Turbine wheel Spec : 84 Trim / 60.0 Major / 55.0 mm Exducer

- There are three types of GT3071R turbine wheel. This housing can not fit 56.5mm/trim 84 nor 56.5mm/trim 90 turbine wheel.

ahh thought it said it didnt fit the 56mm 84 version... which is the only one worth using.

  • Like 1

ahh thought it said it didnt fit the 56mm 84 version... which is the only one worth using.

Interesting.. Not a fan of the 60mm 84T?

I thought the creme of the crop was the 3037 60mm 84T?

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a feeling that IWG housing is a flanged version of the fail-whale 3 bolt one. If you remember there was a guy who hacked open his fail-whale housing to make it a proper open flanged rear end (a Jez customer) and that also failed.

I would probably do this with an EWG housing like urtwhistle, or would consider a G3 with some massive v-band outlet (IWG).

I have a feeling that IWG housing is a flanged version of the fail-whale 3 bolt one. If you remember there was a guy who hacked open his fail-whale housing to make it a proper open flanged rear end (a Jez customer) and that also failed.

I would probably do this with an EWG housing like urtwhistle, or would consider a G3 with some massive v-band outlet (IWG).

yes was concerned about that...but 830 bucks :woot: and its a 12cm so maybe it'll work a little betterer

some goose tried to convince me to put a EFR turbo on it which would be awesome but jeezuuz i can almost get a 2jz half cut for the same price...

also all the budget 7m manifolds are t4 it seems...its an NA+T so 9.something compression...only aiming for low boost and responsiveness and I would prefer IG to keep it simple , not aiming for big power just a meaty midrange and good spread...g3 could work well would prefer power from 3-6rpm

Got some tree stumps need pulling

hahahah dam iphone........... If your going for low boost I wouldn't go the TD06H like I did. I would probably stick to the ordinary TD06 so that it boosts a bit quicker. I went the billet compressor wheel too so I'm not sure what difference that made. Yeah I think it was the one you said wouldn't work hahhahaha. but then again if my memory serves me correct it has a 3" surge TD07 compressor cover not the normal ones. I can't remember, it was too many bourbons ago. All I know is that when I fix all the pipes that blow off above 20psi and fuel surge it will make more power by the feel of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...