Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anti sure housing makes them abit doughier onto boost, and generally need more pressure for the same power.

Oh really? I never realized this! From what i can see there is no replacement comp cover without the anti surge

Might just have to sell this turbo then and go for something else.

Generally speaking what would be the best kinugawa for 400rwhp on an rb25 these days? something that doesnt need 4000rpm to start spooling! Oh also it seems i have the smaller exhaust housing of the 2 that are available, would getting the bigger one make it more laggy ?

it seems the anti surge is meant to act like somewhat of a blow of valve? very weird because when i got my car tuned i asked not to put a blow of valve on the pipework but it kept blowing of inter cooler pipes so we had to install one...

Just recently got my rb25 tuned ... I only got 350rwhp out of the td07 t25g with 10cm anti surge comp housing @ 18 psi... I was thinking its good for 400hp at those psi levels ? ...

Any ideas why it didn't hit 400?

Typical supporting mods, 550cc inj, z32 afm, powerfc, 3" dump intO twin 2.25 no cat, big fmic and forward facing plenum.

Who tuned it, and how do other RB25 compare on that dyno? Odds are that it's nothing to do with the turbo itself.

Anti sure housing makes them abit doughier onto boost, and generally need more pressure for the same power.

I've heard this quite a bit but haven't seen the testing which confirms this - is there a thread or some results which show this? I'm still really impressed with the only Kando turbo I've used so far, it appears to have no issue at all with spool or making power per psi - with an 8cm internal gate making 20psi by 3600rpm on a stock SR20DET, 250rwkw at 16psi on E85. If a non-antisurge one is substantially better, then wow.

I will backup the anti surge housing also, I had the t67-25g with anti surge, replaced it with his normal cover and gained nearly 800rpm response on same boost, brought it alive, this is all on e85 and 22psi. I wouldn't bother with the anti surge housing in the first place.

Hey Methz, I was totally wracking my brain to remember who it was who tried... I couldn't find your post in the 280 odd pages.

Thanks for chiming in.

Do you have the graphs to support?

I will backup the anti surge housing also, I had the t67-25g with anti surge, replaced it with his normal cover and gained nearly 800rpm response on same boost, brought it alive, this is all on e85 and 22psi. I wouldn't bother with the anti surge housing in the first place.

Interesting - what were the relative spool and power numbers? Was there absolutely no other change in the whole setup? Probably no need for the anti-surge in most cases anyway, but still... I'm surprised that there is that big a difference. I'm not surprised there is perhaps a slight difference - though.

no graphs, car came off dyno made 455rwhp 22psi stock rb25, drove around for a few weeks, was real slow onto boost, around 4800 I was making fullboost on dyno and road testing. had a mate with normal front cover lying around so I switched them and on the road its all on at 4k, nothing else was changed.

  • Like 1

Yes - as far as I know they are. The 16Gs from all I have heard have tended to be a little more flow friendly in the "TD06" compressor housings that most of them come from Kando with, not sure exactly how true that is but the 16G cars with the bigger housings seem to punch the better numbers... we treated that as plausible enough that it's what was decided on

Can someone tell me, is the trust t517Z comp wheel and the TD05 16G6 comp wheel the same wheel?

cheers

darren

YEZZZ is same.

The numbering is simple, T517Z for TD05 16G6 and 518 for 18G variant. Likewise T618Z is TD06 18G.

MHI do have a 17C compressor but it is not a suitable candidate, so don't fret its definitely not 517 for 17C.. They called it a 517 because the 16G6 is a larger version of the original 16G.

I will backup the anti surge housing also, I had the t67-25g with anti surge, replaced it with his normal cover and gained nearly 800rpm response on same boost, brought it alive, this is all on e85 and 22psi. I wouldn't bother with the anti surge housing in the first place.

Mines making 20psi and 250rqhp at about 4700 rpm at the moment on 98 pump fuel, maybe changing to non anti surge housing will help , but what rear housing did you have ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...