Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AFAIK the S and SH are both 12 blade, only the SL2 is an 11 blade. The S and SL2 are rated the same but from what i have read the SL2 blade design was designed for small capacity engines and actually flows slightly more than the S.

AFAIK the S and SH are both 12 blade, only the SL2 is an 11 blade. The S and SL2 are rated the same but from what i have read the SL2 blade design was designed for small capacity engines and actually flows slightly more than the S.

sorry not being a smart ass but the tdo5 has a bigger turbine wheel then a sl2 hopw can it flow more ?

just wondering if anyone has any videos of their td06sl2 setups on standard manifolds running yet?

im holding out till next month when kando release their new surge slotted front housing for the l2, then i will be running a td06sl2-20g 10cm on a series 1.5 rb25, standard manifold and gate in the rear housing.

Just curious what the motor is going to sound like with a "big turbo" but standard cast manifold

Twin T67s (L2-25Gs) will be laggy!

full boost at 4k with just 1 on a 2.5L motor, two of them on a 3L will be awful

what size rear cm housing is on that 2.5L............its a forged built motor 272 cams,custom vales and valve lenghts,shimless buckets,ported,,wiseco pistons,manely rods,billet caps,studs,crank been decked out etc

That sounds about right

Have a look on supra forums. There should be a few 2j td06 builds/results on there

already on sf hey champ.........nah man only one guy runs a twin td05/16g set up.......rest use the garret bb gt28's or the very few do run hks items.............mainly all single turbo conversion for the sf boys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...