Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The people who have recommended the GTX3076R - have you guys wondered at all about how the GT30 hotside will support GT3582R levels of compressor flow? Borg Warner have done a similar flowing 76mm compressor in the form of the EFR 7670 but they have gone with a bigger hotside than the GTX3076R, and I am wondering if the GTX3076R may end up being a bit more like a better spooling GT3082R.

I am awaiting results on these new turbos before I get too excited, the GTX3071R is the only one I can see being fool proof and one of those aren't going to meet this lads requirements.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Can you give me a little more input why you think I don't have the setup for 550rwhp? This has been a 3 year project and I'm committed to my goal. Thanks.

Because some of the craziest, dedicated circuit cars, are around the 650-700hp region.

Unless you intend to go all out, balls to the wall style modifications... I just feel it's over the top.

These guys are all running strokers on what are probably 30-40k motors and so on, so they are able to sit in that region without as much issue.

The people who have recommended the GTX3076R - have you guys wondered at all about how the GT30 hotside will support GT3582R levels of compressor flow? Borg Warner have done a similar flowing 76mm compressor in the form of the EFR 7670 but they have gone with a bigger hotside than the GTX3076R, and I am wondering if the GTX3076R may end up being a bit more like a better spooling GT3082R.

I am awaiting results on these new turbos before I get too excited, the GTX3071R is the only one I can see being fool proof and one of those aren't going to meet this lads requirements.

Can't say i had an issue with my 3040 (600hp) item. The GTX3076 would be what, 600-650 now?

Haha wierd coincidence. I was just thinking about that before reading this thread.

They should make a GTX3576R.

I really think Garrett make good compressors, cores, turbines and housings but do a shit job of matching them all together in some cases.

Mitsubishi and Borg Warner have their compressor wheels and turbine wheels much more similar in size.

lol @ live with 550rwhp on dynojet - funny guy.

I really want to note here that your current supporting setup is lacking for 550rwhp, and it is possibly what is holding you back at the moment, as has been said already.

I believe the cost to benefit ratio between hitting an actual 550rwhp and swapping turbos to max out your current setup may weigh heavily in the smaller turbo department.

I forsee selling your turbo and a retune could see costs under $2000 with all things considered... Where as supporting changes to see 550rwhp could easily be double. As stated also, the car is light and having it on power sooner (and with similar power to what you have currently) could be an awesome change for the best.

Have you seen:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/347726-kando-dynamics-turbo/

That turbo seems to be of 35R power and has been seen to produce 3076 type response (in posts by Status with 180rwkw[250rwhp] by 4000rpm from memory)... It also costs under $1000 AUD delivered.

What a/r hotside were you running, and how much power did you make with it?

.82

45mm gate

GTSR manifold.

270 @ 17 PULP

370 @ 24 SUNOCO 104

it'd be well into the 300 on PULP. my bad 3" exhaust caused issues.

and then i was EPAd, so took out the setup before getting a 3.5-4" done.

if your looking for that sort of power and to make the most of the new compressors i'd go a 1.06 housing on the gt30, twin scroll if your manifold allows it. it wont get you 550rwhp (on our dynos anyway, not sure how different yours are) but it should make a solid 450rwhp with a very nice midrange

Ah ok so really kinda hard to compare ultimately :(

Yep :(

Its just a theory, but it did make the power on fuel - which does tend to mask exhaust issues to a point - so it can at least flow that much.

I really wish i had a chance to see it to the end, but ye, 25 out, 26 in!

Again -- appreciate the suggestions and advice...

I don't want to revisit all of the details of my very disappointing introduction to the tuner world and how much money it has cost me, but let's just say that I'm not looking for a quick fix or a cheap solution. I've seen one additional piece of information about getting the engine to perform at a 550rwhp level (stroker kit), but I have also seen contradictory information... Suggesting that a simple turbo fix or increasing the psi to 22-24 will achieve the power is odd since people are also saying that the car is not capable of 550rwhp.

For the sake of argument... Let's just assume money is not an issue. What will it take to get this engine performing 550rwhp reliably on pump gas while not sacrificing spool?

I've wasted a lot of time and money going on hearsay from forums in the US, but I really need some concrete facts on whether or not this engine is capable of doing what I want?

Edited by radianation

I would start with the fuel system, a Nice 4L surge tank with twin pumps.

Some nice tough valve springs

Bigger exhaust and dump pipe + good 4 or 5" body cat

Do you have pics of your exhaust manifold, maybe spend some coin on a Full Race one.

Can I ask what duty cycle you are seeing with the 850cc injectors?

How much timing are you running?

What Intercooler are you using?

What compression ratio? from memory the Weiso's are quite low on comp + your head gasket

I have a lovefab exhaust manifold. Pics are not the best:

2507214488_5c38e136f1_z.jpg?zz=1

2439869248_5f557704db_z.jpg?zz=1

2439045321_78fca6dc63_z.jpg?zz=1

2439869188_fbe2f3f1c1_z.jpg?zz=1

Injectors were around 60% duty cycle during last dyno tune. Fuel delivery did not seem to be a limitation at that time, but I agree the fuel system is not very stout. Already researching a surge tank thanks to your suggestion. Any specific recommendation on pumps? Most people doing RB swaps go for the Walbro, but it does seem to be a shortcut... I don't want my fuel pump failing on the track. =)

I will grab a screenshot of my timing map from the AEM EMS tomorrow and post it here.

I do not know what kind of intercooler - it appears to be generic fmic.

I do not know the exact compression ratio. I have Wiseco 20+ pistons and a Cometic 1.1mm head gasket. Thank you btw.

Also, back to the possible issue of valve float, if you watch in this video, right about the time where the dip is in the power on my dyno chart you see a puff of black smoke from the exhaust. Any clue?

Nothing wrong with that exhaust manifold!

For the pumps i would go 2 x Bosch 044's or if you like the walbros go 2x the inline Walbro, (GSS-341?)

The puff of smoke could be a number of things, but the video doesnt give any real clue as to what is going on (to me anyhow)

I honestly cannot hear valve float in your video, however you are well beyond the known point for stock valve springs.. So I would change these and save the heartache later.

To get to your powergoal I would agree with what has been advised as is:

Run a fuel surge tank, lift off your existing walbro then 2 x pumps up the standard line.

Completely new TBE. 4" dump minimum and 3.5" catback minimum.

More boost.

A proper intercooler (not a generic china item). - my addition

If the above doesnt work for you.. you know a change of turbo SHOULD be the trick (assuming you dont just have a dud motor).

Be it myself chasing 400+rwkw (550rwhp), my turbo choices would be T04Z, GT3788 and GT4088. I think the T04Z is the safest option, it is documented to death on this forum... Give the search a wurl. I honestly know Nothing about your current turbo.

Good tips. So no need to upgrade the OEM fuel lines when going to 2 x pumps and surge tank?

My current wastegate is plumbed back into my exhaust at an angle where the dump pipe bends. I'm thinking about removing this and going open wastegate. Now would be the time to decide as I configure an entirely new exhaust.

I wish I could find out what intercooler I have. The shop who assisted me with this originally from 3 years ago purchased it and claimed it was a quality product, but I've never seen a name on it. =/

I'll do some more searches on here for the T04Z feedback.

Edited by radianation

Suggesting that a simple turbo fix or increasing the psi to 22-24 will achieve the power is odd since people are also saying that the car is not capable of 550rwhp.

nonononono... the MOTOR is capable, but the driver/car setup/cooling etc - is not.

Anyone can make power on a dyno mate.

Its getting it to last 3-5 years that is the real challenge ;)

I agree - making power is no good if it's not sustainable, which is why I've taken steps to improve the weak points of the engine. However, you're still not qualifying what you're saying, and I am a little confused now as to why you're suggesting that the driver is not capable of producing 550rwhp?

Also, the power has lasted (so far) for 3 years. It's just not my goal.

Edited by radianation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...