Jump to content
SAU Community

Difference Between R33 Gtst S1 And S2 Tps?

brother_david

By brother_david,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

they physically appear different

the series 1 has an extra block with 2 extra wires, i dont know what it is used for or what it does, but it is physically different

if you go into the howto area and look at series 1 vs series 2 from memory there are more details and pics in there

brother_david Rising Star

brother_david

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks mate! Had a look and its clearly a difference with one/two connectors. Form building my RB30 using a Q45 TB i remeber that it has two connectors too but i just used one, no problem.

I guess now my question is if its possible to use the S2 TPS with my S1 loom? Been reading alot and one of the posts stated that there is no problem at all, others stating that there should be.

radianation Explorer

radianation

Posted
Posted

Just realized I responded to this thread thinking you had asked about CAS and not TPS. Sorry about that. I recently replaced both and also had to rewire my TPS (using Q45).

ChEwDog Explorer

ChEwDog

Posted
Posted (edited)

Series 1s have an igniter pack on top of the valve cover ,it has 2 green relays that sit in the engine's harness, one for the ecu, the other for the ignitor/coils, and it shares the same coil packs as the rb20 and 26's.

Series 2 has individual ignitors built into each coil pack ( vs) one for all (series 1) which is also why it only has 1 green relay in the wiring harness which is for the ecu. and other electrical differences.

Also the MAF sensor and plug...... 3 prongs inside the MAF connection = Series 2, 5 prongs = Series 1.

TPS aka ( throttle position sensor) sensors are diffrent on S1 vs S2

and i belive that the cam angle sensor are diffret between the both.

other than that i belive thats all the diffrences between each other...... they are the exact same thing and produce the same power, same turbo ect.... other then theese diffrences listed above, its the same S@!T hahha

Edited by ChEwDog
brother_david Rising Star

brother_david

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not the same turbo though.. ;P The S2 is a ceramic one, the S1 is a metal piece meaning itll last longer :)

Ill have to investigate all this with the wiring to the TPS, guess ill hook up NisTune and check if it gives a correct signal, better use a low-amp fuse when testing it out so that i dont sent 12v instead of 5v to the ECU.

Not sure about the CAS wiring though, they are different but a friend of mine has got a S1.5 (non-igniter, should be S2 engine) but he has got a S1 CAS by the looks of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Are you an oil nerd?

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • GTSBoy
      Are you an oil nerd?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • dbm7
      BCNR33 Blower Motor Resistor - Testing

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Murray_Calavera
      Steps to DIY sanding car back ready for respray....

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...