Jump to content
SAU Community

Petrol Consumption

jawrgy

By jawrgy,
in V Series (V35, V36, V37 & Infiniti)

 Share

Recommended Posts

sonicii Veteran

sonicii

Posted
Posted

I bought my 05 6MT sedan back in 2011 and it has consistently returned between 10.5 and 11L/100km in the city and around 7.5L/100km on the highway (no idea what that is in km/l), hasn't really changed much at all over the last 11 years, has over 170,000km on it now.  Always used 98RON since the handbook specifies 96, although I suspect that may just be what they have in Japan.  Definitely 80L tank, I have some of the original brochures from Japan and they all say 80L.

  • Like 1
ELFGT350 Community Regular

ELFGT350

Posted
Posted
On 18/4/2022 at 3:03 PM, sonicii said:

I bought my 05 6MT sedan back in 2011 and it has consistently returned between 10.5 and 11L/100km in the city and around 7.5L/100km on the highway (no idea what that is in km/l), hasn't really changed much at all over the last 11 years, has over 170,000km on it now.  Always used 98RON since the handbook specifies 96, although I suspect that may just be what they have in Japan.  Definitely 80L tank, I have some of the original brochures from Japan and they all say 80L.

Hi Sonicii, thats really good thats 9.09 to 9.52 klm/l city and 13.3klm/L highway. Its slightly better than the best I got on average. I did these numbers numbers sometimes but not often.

Forgot to mention mine came with Impul chip & fujitsubi exhaust so that may account for the tiny difference. Also depends on how much mixed conditions- traffic/open rd driving. I have a little more pull than standard car.

  • 2 weeks later...
Vee37 Collaborator

Vee37

Posted
Posted

On my previous car (2003 350GT), I found that the car had noticeable better fuel economy if i kept around 80KM/h. If I cruised above that, the economy went down. At best, I think I was able to get it down to the mid to high 8l/100km (12.5km/l which included some 60kim/h to get to the highway).

Another thing I noticed, was that my fuel economy dropped at one point for some unknown reason. But, a few weeks later, one of my ignition coil started to fail (when cold). After I replaced two of them (another was heading out), my fuel economy got better again.

Now with my 370GT, I have to be very careful, and the best I have seen thus far (once, for a very short length of time at the end of a freeway run, with some city driving) is around 12.4km/l (ie 8.0l/100km, driving at 100 km/h) but usually its closer to 7km/l (14l/100km) around the city (currently siting on 6.7km/100km ie 15l/100kim all city traffic driving).

Not absolutely sure if it truly made the difference, but the best amount was when I accidentally filled up using 95octane, and then added an octane booster when I realised my mistake. Its actually an injector cleaner, but the reviews talked about octane boost. And maybe I got some placebo effect and/or drove more carefully/gingerly after reading the reviews or because I was on 95.

https://www.supercheapauto.com.au/p/rislone-high-performance-injector-cleaner---177ml/290781.html

  • Like 1
ELFGT350 Community Regular

ELFGT350

Posted
Posted
On 27/4/2022 at 11:15 AM, Vee37 said:

On my previous car (2003 350GT), I found that the car had noticeable better fuel economy if i kept around 80KM/h. If I cruised above that, the economy went down. At best, I think I was able to get it down to the mid to high 8l/100km (12.5km/l which included some 60kim/h to get to the highway).

Another thing I noticed, was that my fuel economy dropped at one point for some unknown reason. But, a few weeks later, one of my ignition coil started to fail (when cold). After I replaced two of them (another was heading out), my fuel economy got better again.

Now with my 370GT, I have to be very careful, and the best I have seen thus far (once, for a very short length of time at the end of a freeway run, with some city driving) is around 12.4km/l (ie 8.0l/100km, driving at 100 km/h) but usually its closer to 7km/l (14l/100km) around the city (currently siting on 6.7km/100km ie 15l/100kim all city traffic driving).

Not absolutely sure if it truly made the difference, but the best amount was when I accidentally filled up using 95octane, and then added an octane booster when I realised my mistake. Its actually an injector cleaner, but the reviews talked about octane boost. And maybe I got some placebo effect and/or drove more carefully/gingerly after reading the reviews or because I was on 95.

https://www.supercheapauto.com.au/p/rislone-high-performance-injector-cleaner---177ml/290781.html

Your numbers are bang on the mark for the 350gt. Syd traffic has gotten so bad now that its impossible to get near those numbers nowadays- especially with the mileage mine has done now. Question : Is yours an Auto or Manual?

Nissan say the 370 is slightly better on fuel consumption because of variable valve timing on both inlet/out can control the duration better. But not surprised given that real world driving is the real test.!. Also manual or Auto?

Vee37 Collaborator

Vee37

Posted
Posted
On 4/27/2022 at 11:53 AM, ELFGT350 said:

Your numbers are bang on the mark for the 350gt. Syd traffic has gotten so bad now that its impossible to get near those numbers nowadays- especially with the mileage mine has done now. Question : Is yours an Auto or Manual?

Nissan say the 370 is slightly better on fuel consumption because of variable valve timing on both inlet/out can control the duration better. But not surprised given that real world driving is the real test.!. Also manual or Auto?

The 350GT coupe was an auto. I don't own it anymore. As it got older, my economy dropped, but as I said, in my specific case, the aging/failing coils may have been at least partially responsible. And the good numbers were for driving about 20km city and about 50km freeway.

The 370GT coupe is also an Auto. As I think the numbers show, i have to be very ginger with the throttle to even approach the same numbers as the 350GT. In the real world, its hard to keep off that throttle all the time, and not bring yourself up to the speed limit, faster than what would really be necessary. One of the cars I inspected before buying my one, the owners mother drove it regularly and complained about how much fuel it drank. She complained how me and the inspector were sitting in the car idling to keep the AC running; it was a hot day and we were in the direct sun.

PS: With the additive, I added/eye-balled about 1/3 of the bottle, to about half a tank.

ELFGT350 Community Regular

ELFGT350

Posted
Posted

The most efficient way to drive these cars (as with most cars), IS to get them to 60 pretty quick and just use the upper gear to keep them coasting efficiently. Keeping the car in the highest possible gear - without the need to drop back often is the key to being efficient. Nannying it does not work!. If you watch the “Leaf” in the fuel consumption gauge you will see this. When I first got mine I was often averaging over 9klm/l in the city when traffic was less and I would keep momentum even in corners using 3rd at 30kph. Thats the fun of a manual even spirited driving is better for consumption. Constant slowing or accelerating from low speed under 30kph is where you burn the most fuel, because you are moving 1.6tonne from the most inefficient engine speeds. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • tsuokun
      Lets play a game - What is causing my oil consumption?

      By tsuokun · Posted

      Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • 25RBGT
      Got this r31 silhouette flood car to rebuild.

      By 25RBGT · Posted

      Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Shoota_77
      Car Rotisserie

      By Shoota_77 · Posted

      Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • GTSBoy
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • joshuaho96
      Rb25det Belts Change

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...