Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

SuperTech 86.5 mm piston

TOMEI 1.5mm @ 87mm metal head gasket with oil restrictor

Jun Oil Pump

Balance crank, piston, rod, clutch, main pulley

Refresh Standard Head

HKS step 1 IN/EX 264 cam

Jun Cam gear

BC valve spring

Greddy type 6 throttle intake manifold

SARD 720cc injector

HKS type fuel rail

Tomei Fuel regulator

HKS 2530 turbo

Full HKS hard piping / balance pipe ex manifold

Power FC D Jetro

ETC ETC...

Attached is the dyno for new and old turbo

HKS 2530 vs Garrett GT35R Twin scroll 1.06 AR

Do you think the new HKS 2530 turbo is laggy????

Seems that the GT35R is more responsive than the HKS 2530... ermm...

Would appreciate a good feedback...

NOTE: i have change the fuel pump to Bosch 044 and dump the walbro.... rubbish.... :)

post-23041-0-44960000-1293465342_thumb.jpg

post-23041-0-26026400-1293465419_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348489-rb26-gt35-vs-hks-2530/
Share on other sites

If the bottom line is boost, then as stated you have issues.

You are not seeing peak boost until 5800rpm, thats a bit absurd for 2530's :)

Fix the boost control, fix the output.

Also comparatively, the GT35 is lacking a bit of power. It should be much closer.

2530's won't make 100rwkw more than a GT35/1.06

A bit more, yes, but that much - no.

If the bottom line is boost, then as stated you have issues.

You are not seeing peak boost until 5800rpm, thats a bit absurd for 2530's :)

Fix the boost control, fix the output.

Also comparatively, the GT35 is lacking a bit of power. It should be much closer.

2530's won't make 100rwkw more than a GT35/1.06

A bit more, yes, but that much - no.

THank you but what do u mean by fix the output?

and does this mean that the 2530 have problem?

i am using the blitz old type of boost controller (hi low nop) via actuator.

pull the vac line off the actuators and plug them up. then see when you hit full boost, make sure you back off when you do tho. if its the same, wire the gates shut and try again.

keep a very close eye on boost and back off as soon as you reach your target, otherwise it'll keep going higher

If the bottom line is boost, then as stated you have issues.

You are not seeing peak boost until 5800rpm, thats a bit absurd for 2530's :)

Fix the boost control, fix the output.

Also comparatively, the GT35 is lacking a bit of power. It should be much closer.

2530's won't make 100rwkw more than a GT35/1.06

A bit more, yes, but that much - no.

oh ya regarding the GT35 that time i have issue with the fuelling where i only can reach till 490 to 500 OTW HP.

on the other hand i never thought that 2530 could do 600 OTW HP. izzit normal for 2530 to do 600 on wheel?

when u are talking about the output, izzit the source of vacumn for the boost controller izzit?

wire the gates shut and try again. this will tell you if its simply weak actuators or something else like cam timing

have tried wire the gate n it is still the same.

have not change any timing to the cam and it is the same with the GT35 setting...

ermm....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...