Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ABS has saved me loads of times on the street esp in the wet.

Really good safety feature when breaking as they dont lock up your brakes which can make your car skid out of control and crash.

Instead of locking up they gradually grab and release the disc brakes.

i said motorkhana not drift.... it can involve lots of hard breaking depending on course layout, not just to get the car sideways

i'm still yet to see how ABS would be a disavantage in a motorkhana. outright braking power will still be the same, and you get the advantage of still being able to steer while braking hard without the fear of locking up. up until the point of having a wheel locking up ABS is the same as non-ABS (you can still modulate the braking to be on the point of locking up and not actually have the ABS engage), but once you do lock up then the ABS is better.

i'm still yet to see how ABS would be a disavantage in a motorkhana. outright braking power will still be the same, and you get the advantage of still being able to steer while braking hard without the fear of locking up. up until the point of having a wheel locking up ABS is the same as non-ABS (you can still modulate the braking to be on the point of locking up and not actually have the ABS engage), but once you do lock up then the ABS is better.

good driver will outbrake ABS.

Of course a good driver will out brake ABS, I've seen it many times myself - but can you say that in every situation?

Unless you are epically well trained, you will jump on the anchors if say, a roo, jumped out in front of ya :)

And even with ABS on, if yuo out-brake it, then sweet. If not, then it's there to lend a hand

If all the conditions are perfect, you're prepared for it and you hit the brakes just strong enough not to lock up then yeah you can beat ABS easy. But as soon as you "slam" on the brakes in a moment of adrenaline, you're f**ked. ABS wins every time in that 'panic' situation because it gives you the option of steering.

I've never seen how ABS can be bad given it waits until a wheel breaks traction before it engages...ABS either kicks in or you're in a slide...

No flatspots on my tyres after DECA...!!!

i have raced both my R31 (no ABS) and my girlfriends R34 (ABS) on the same same and both had the exact same brakes r32 GTR drilled/slotted and R33 4 piston calipers.

there was a noticable difference between the two. The 31 felt like you could break harder before it would lock up a wheel although when it locked up you couldnt turn. The 34 seemed to lockup a little more, but it wasnt as noticable as such because you could still continue 'driving' on turn in.

my experience is for drifting ABS is not going to make a difference at all.

ABS is generally not preferable in a racecar situation, because racecars get into situations not common to road cars, and any decent driver should not need ABS anyway. One easy example is a spin where you want to lock the wheels up, I've head of times when people with ABS equipped cars have lost all braking power because the ABS system was overwhelmed.

There's a reason why the Porsche GT3RS and Noble M600 don't come with ABS.

I cannot do J turns with ABS pluged in in my 33, I may just be crap but my old MR2 (AW11 non ABS) loved them.

And I like the felling of gassing it to the entry of a corner and then mashing the brakes without fear of my crapness flat spoting my $500 tyres which acording to my budget must last 1 year.

ABS is generally not preferable in a racecar situation, because racecars get into situations not common to road cars, and any decent driver should not need ABS anyway. One easy example is a spin where you want to lock the wheels up, I've head of times when people with ABS equipped cars have lost all braking power because the ABS system was overwhelmed.

There's a reason why the Porsche GT3RS and Noble M600 don't come with ABS.

this

Of course a good driver will out brake ABS, I've seen it many times myself - but can you say that in every situation?

Unless you are epically well trained, you will jump on the anchors if say, a roo, jumped out in front of ya :)

And even with ABS on, if yuo out-brake it, then sweet. If not, then it's there to lend a hand

and are epically calm. i've done driver training courses, etc that teach you about brake modulation, etc, but i've had animals and people run out in front of me and i can tell you that all of that goes out the window. you instinctively stomp on the brake pedal as hard as you can, and the closer you get the harder you push the pedal, regardless of whether the wheels are locked up or not. the reasoning your brain isn't consulted in these circumstances. it's all well and good to say about braking distances of a good driver in a non ABS car to an average driver with ABS, but that is in a controlled environment when they know they are going to have to brake suddenly. in an emergency situation that comparison doesn't work.

ABS is generally not preferable in a racecar situation, because racecars get into situations not common to road cars, and any decent driver should not need ABS anyway. One easy example is a spin where you want to lock the wheels up, I've head of times when people with ABS equipped cars have lost all braking power because the ABS system was overwhelmed.

There's a reason why the Porsche GT3RS and Noble M600 don't come with ABS.

porsche carrera cup cars use a version of ABS.

as for the ABS being overwhelmed, a lot of people do the wrong thing when braking with ABS once it has kicked in. you will get people who feel the feedback through the pedal so they start lifting off and reapplying the brakes or pumping the brakes. this is the totally wrong thing to do. you are actually better off just keeping your foot buried into the pedal and letting it sort itself out rather the confusing it by altering brake pressure. also i think you may find that some of the braking failures may have been caused by either boiled brake fluid or the brakes overheating and glazing up, and if you get warped rotors and add that to the mix with ABS then you are in for all sorts of dramas.

Unless you are epically well trained, you will jump on the anchors if say, a roo, jumped out in front of ya :)

yeah but how often does a roo jump out in front of you when your 'drifting or having fun with the car' *thread title*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the latter. No diff should have a centre replaced without checking clearances because its unlikely to be the same as whatever came out. Not that that stops most people just checking a new centre in
    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...