Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nope, ARX and AXIS have a larger rolling diameter.

also PM35s are different, also as as 2WD and 4WD models of the PM35 (im only talking about models available in australia)

True Ian; but Ironpaw isn't running STD 17's on his anymore, (due to Brembos?) so his Rolling Dia. (depending on tyre profile) will be close to, if not slightly bigger than an AXIS and only around 3% smaller than an AR-X.

Detailed my car today, in anticipation of it's shiny new Aero Bars (which are taking WAAAAAY too long to get painted); my son of rajab it's a sexy bitch when it's shiny!:banana:

Dodo juice Lime Prime is very nice to use on black paint.

Edited by Daleo

dude post up some pics when its done!! i dont think ive seen a black aero model before...........

as for the wheels, wouldnt wheel weight make a difference too, unsprung weight helps with accelleratiion and braking :)

True Ian; but Ironpaw isn't running STD 17's on his anymore, (due to Brembos?) so his Rolling Dia. (depending on tyre profile) will be close to, if not slightly bigger than an AXIS and only around 3% smaller than an AR-X.

yeh i didnt want to compare with everyone else. i wanted to see if there was any improvement running the extra boost?

5psi for under 100nm(on cihans dyno) isnt worth it imo..

oh n found out my fuel leak wasnt a fuel leak. the sensor is playin up..

Detailed my car today, in anticipation of it's shiny new Aero Bars (which are taking WAAAAAY too long to get painted); my son of rajab it's a sexy bitch when it's shiny!:banana:

Dodo juice Lime Prime is very nice to use on black paint.

Reflection? post-61153-0-26778900-1310425114_thumb.jpg Try not to look at the ugly bloke; post-61153-0-56895300-1310425163_thumb.jpg

With painted skirts;post-61153-0-59531300-1310425226_thumb.jpg Without; post-61153-0-55007600-1310425328_thumb.jpg

Now hurry up with my bits!rant.gif

Farrrk I forgot how ugly our cars are without the Aero kit...:yucky:

I know, it looks like the dumb smiling kid at the back of the classroom.

Eating paste...

Hey Dale, who painted the tree mural on your bonnet? Not my choice of artwork but it's very realistic.

rofl.gif

Door molds?

Yeah, I dunno; I think they tie the wheel colour in better now, as there isn't won't be so much grey.

Going to wait and see; can always get them done later, they're easy to match. KH3 is straight black tinter.

Edited by Daleo

Ok, I just had my old boss translate the Nissan user manual regarding oils, he is Japanese. It said the front and rear diff uses 80w-90 and made NO mention of LSD or non LSD. If its a clutch type LSD as some are thinking the 80w-90 will be fine, this is what we used in our 2 way clutch LSD's, so we cant see it being a problem.

got a dyno sheet?? what torque figures you get??

post-37023-0-31134200-1310446822_thumb.jpg

700-750nm's.....from 3,000 to end buddy!...what was yours again......at 16psi???.....and was it a flat torque curve or a little all over the place?

.....I'm not worried....I am sure I'll crack 800-900nm / 300AWKW's on BP98 at 20-21psi........imagine if I ran E85.

P.S. Don't diss our housings mofo......they are a pretty good stock unit imo.....not as good as the GTX.....and if I had of has the time, tools, money and room I might have gone that way!....who is to say which has more lag? and who is to say what the HP difference is when comparing apples with apples!post-37023-0-31134200-1310446822_thumb.jpg

post-37023-0-31134200-1310446822_thumb.jpg

700-750nm's.....from 3,000 to end buddy!...what was yours again......at 16psi???.....and was it a flat torque curve or a little all over the place?

.....I'm not worried....I am sure I'll crack 800-900nm / 300AWKW's on BP98 at 20-21psi........imagine if I ran E85.

P.S. Don't diss our housings mofo......they are a pretty good stock unit imo.....not as good as the GTX.....and if I had of has the time, tools, money and room I might have gone that way!....who is to say which has more lag? and who is to say what the HP difference is when comparing apples with apples!post-37023-0-31134200-1310446822_thumb.jpg

what are you talking about man, i was asking Jethro lol.

who said im dissing our housings?

your on drugs again arent you?

what are you talking about man, i was asking Jethro lol.

who said im dissing our housings?

your on drugs again arent you?

rofl.gifrofl.gifblush.gif

Edited by Jetwreck

yeh yours is OK......but I am producing the same as you at 105km's and more at 180km's!!!! :P

you sure about that bud?

Looks like you have 140 at 105kph... he has 160 at the same speed, yes?

Or am I reading it wrong??

you sure about that bud?

Looks like you have 140 at 105kph... he has 160 at the same speed, yes?

Or am I reading it wrong??

I'm reading it wrong down the bottom!...lol

Edited by Jetwreck

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...