Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I promise you I was never the type to kick a ball around, and only rode my bike when I was like 10. In fact I play video games less now than I ever did when I was younger.

And as you age you come to realize how crappy/expensive going out is rather than how good video games have become.

  • Like 1

So what exactly did you do back in the day??

I know going out has always been expensive but that wasn't my point. My point is video games have prevented people from actually leaving the house. We go on holidays And there's always someone that brings a ps3 or 360 and we spend more time playing that than going to the beach and getting some sun... Whether I'm a beach person or not.

Online play has only worsened it because now people play against mates yet live like freakin hermits.

Do you know why they call it a 360? Because when you see it, you turn 360 degrees and walk away.

Don't you mean double-jump or infinite-magnet-fly?

Wii is a gimmick, you jiggle the remote-like controller around for a bit, have a few laughs and then it gathers dust.

Standard the PS3 is a better PVR / entertainment platform but I wouldn't pick it for it's games and especially for it's glowing knob answer to the Wii.

Xbox is the better gaming system and you can have Foxtel I guess if that's your thing. Kinect is better then whatever the hell the PS3 thing is but they are both only there to remove the Wii niche.

In summary I have lost the will to give a shit while typing this out.

Well I suckered one into it hahaha.

I actually like all three consoles, they all have their weaknesses and strengths.

Wii = drunken parties and bludgeoning people with controllers after losing, but you'll never play it by yourself.

PS3 = in your room by yourself playing COD when you're not masturbating, and folding@home when you are.

360 = sitting there with your only friend ready to play Halo 7 that you camped out for...what does this red ring of lights mean?

+red dead redemption, the start of the 3D GTA games(yes i know GTA started on PC), GT5's, killzone's (which was good....but not enough) all good reasons to go for a PS of any variety

pretty much anything you can get on Xbox comes on PC right?? other than halo...but i never got into that much for unknown reasons.

PC does win overall, but thats not the point atm is it

+red dead redemption, the start of the 3D GTA games(yes i know GTA started on PC), GT5's, killzone's (which was good....but not enough) all good reasons to go for a PS of any variety

pretty much anything you can get on Xbox comes on PC right?? other than halo...but i never got into that much for unknown reasons.

PC does win overall, but thats not the point atm is it

wut

The only PS exclusive there is GT5, you win at failing.

  • Nope 1

Lol @ saying ps3 has no exclusives. This isn't the first year of it's release it released more exclusives this year then the xbox and overtime has probably had the same amount of exclusives as the xbox. Xbox is for all the pimply fps gamers who are too cheap to buy a decent pc. Ps3 has uncharted which IMO owns anything on the 360 :)

Lol @ saying ps3 has no exclusives. This isn't the first year of it's release it released more exclusives this year then the xbox and overtime has probably had the same amount of exclusives as the xbox. Xbox is for all the pimply fps gamers who are too cheap to buy a decent pc. Ps3 has uncharted which IMO owns anything on the 360 :)

and apparently you fail at reading.

Out of the list given only GT5 was exclusive to PS3.

  • Nope 1

Lol WTF? You fail at trying to make people look like they failed. I was actually saying a general statement about the whole ps3 has no games thing. I never even quoted your post, said anything about your posts OR gt5. Maybe you fail at reading? BTW GT5 isn't the only exclusive in his list, oh and he never mentioned exclusives ;) Oh the ironing


and apparently you fail at reading.

Out of the list given only GT5 was exclusive to PS3.
Edited by topher_

lol.....i didnt say PS3 either...i was talking PS's in general, believe it or not there were 2 before it already

+how long was it before GTA3 came out on xbox??? around about when vice city came out on PS...........same with red dead. im positive this only came on PS3 first cause i wanted it on PC sooo bad

and my point of getting almost all xbox games on PC aswell still stands :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nissan/Pitwork is fine stuff. HKS is just marketing wank. I personally wouldn't do the idler if it is already new. If it looks and feels fine, it is fine. But as D says - it's cheap to add it to the job. The water pump ditto. Even more so. If it show no signs of problems, then it is nearly new - leave it.
    • 1. I can't see a location on your profile but you do mention GBP so I'll assume you are in UK. In Australia, CBC make a timing belt kit with the gears and idler and tension bearing and that is what I use without any problems. I'm sure OEM or HKS are also fine but I wouldn't pay extra for HKS over anything else. 2. Yes, I would always change the idler and tensioner and the stud and bolt that hold them in. Assuming they were all done last time it is highly unlikely you would have a problem, but they are very cheap to add to the job considering the time it will take anyway.  3. No, you don't need to lock them as such (I think that is more for engines without timing marks), but you should make sure they move as little as possible once the belt is off as you can hit pistons on valves if they move too far. As always, make sure you line it all up to top dead centre with the timing marks aligned before you take the old belt off.
    • How to wreak havoc at a bogans party... Swap out the goon bag hanging from the clothes line with oil bag... Watch chaos ensue during Goon of Fortune....
    • Hey everyone,   I’m looking for some advice on replacing the timing belt on my RB25DET Neo-powered 1998 Skyline. The engine was fully built about five years ago, including a fresh timing belt, water pump, and other essentials. However, since then, the car has only covered around 2,000–3,000 miles. It’s currently making around 650hp.   Even though the mileage is low, I know timing belts have a time-based lifespan too, and most recommendations suggest changing them every five to six years or 50,000 miles. Since I’m at that time mark, I’d rather not take any risks and plan to swap it out soon.   A few things I’d like to hear opinions on: 1. What’s the best belt for this setup? Should I go with an OEM Nissan belt, or is the HKS fine-tune a better choice given the power level? 2. Would you bother replacing the idler pulley and tensioner at the same time, or only if they show wear? 3. When swapping the belt, is it necessary to lock the cam and crank gears in place, or is lining up the timing marks enough? I’ve seen different approaches, and I want to make sure I do it right.   The water pump was changed with the rebuild and isn’t run off the timing belt, so I don’t see a need to replace it again. I just want to make sure I approach this the right way.   Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...