Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dyno's don't read time, they read rpm vs power (or variants of that). You can see the power under the curve, but you can't really tell the actual response time of the setup.

Good point if you are locked into rpm.

Surely you could set up the bottom axis as time though? I guess some of the old software is probably limiting but it would be a very simple calculation for the people who make it.

  • 2 months later...

oh, yes those pics on RHD are the correct HKS front pipes. one thing to note, they are quoting ID as 70mmX2 and single 85mm. most other places seem to quote OD which makes these approx 75mm X2 and 90mm single when comparing to other exhausts. I'll still measure mine this weekend, but those are the ones. best front pipes I've ever seen. have flex joint, have very, very nice welding, flanges welded on the inside, good quality stainless, extra thick flanges to help stop distortion and etc etc. they are the goods.

Baron,

Just bought a set of front pipes (possibly Top secret drag)

They are 75mm ID into over 100mm ID merge, Coupling this with a pair of Midori Dumps, would this not be a better front front half for a GT-R ?

What an interesting time for this thread to get bumped to the top, only a couple of days before someone is doing -5's on a stroker motor. That timing is such a coincidence its not even funny

Haha. Interested in a set of GT RS's? Going cheap :thumbsup:

Haha,

Thanks for the offer but I'm looking at the same thing as you (-5's) But I only have a little 2.64 odd Litre to play with unlike you big Forklift boys :D

Waiting for my 044's to show so I can finish the fuel system !!!

3.0>2.8.

That is all.

haha paul - were u really that impressed with my rb2630 :)

i now have an rb26 & i personally wouldn't do another rb2630, the car becomes a 'chop shop' & besides that, rb26 revs much nicer & howls when compared to the 3ltr

i also think though, either stick with the rb26 OR if u want larger displacement go straight to a 3ltr or larger :)

Is that like 32>33?

Yeah right! :nyaanyaa:

haha paul - were u really that impressed with my rb2630 :)

i now have an rb26 & i personally wouldn't do another rb2630, the car becomes a 'chop shop' & besides that, rb26 revs much nicer & howls when compared to the 3ltr

i also think though, either stick with the rb26 OR if u want larger displacement go straight to a 3ltr or larger :)

I have said it before and I will say it again.... After driving your car (and I have since driven Steveo's) you would be silly NOT to go that way. They rev, they do everything a 26 based block does... just better. You only have to butcher the car if you have a 32... the other two is no real issue.

I will say this though... if you have the engine out and WANT to keep the original block you have rocks in your head by staying the standard stroke crank. 77.7 mm at the very minimum. It makes the car so much nicer to drive!

Something I do notice is that not alot of people take advantage of the 26 bore stroke ratio, so realistically for alot of people going the 3.0 litre for lazier power is indeed a good option, particularly if you are beginning a rebuild.

There are lots and lots of very fast 2.6 litre cars though, some of the fastest in the world even.

Something I do notice is that not alot of people take advantage of the 26 bore stroke ratio, so realistically for alot of people going the 3.0 litre for lazier power is indeed a good option, particularly if you are beginning a rebuild.

There are lots and lots of very fast 2.6 litre cars though, some of the fastest in the world even.

Racecar is different. For the street a nice fat twist curve rules... Can't always have 5k + on board.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...