Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

who has a microtech LT-12

What is base timing for R33 series 2 - isn't it 20deg measured at idle?

Could you take a look at the log of timing position and tell me what your idle ignition timing is set at?

I read that the timing is meant to be 20deg in idle in neutral on the standard computer? Shouldn't it be the same on LT-12?

On the microtech data logging screen, mine reads 10deg at idle in neutral.

Is this indicative of incorrect base timing?

Also isn't the TPS supposed to go all the way to 100% - mine only goes to 99% and I wonder if this could be the cause of a lack of extra kickdown when the pedal hits the metal for the auto trans.

Does TPS wire go directly to the auto box? (don't have a w/shop manual to check)

Could calibration of the TPS have to be done specially for the auto subcomp as well? Maybe this is the reason that while the auto box works it doesn't work quite as well.

Would any of this cause my fuel economy to be like this:

22L/100km when gentle driving for tank

and

16L/100km when I hammer it for a full tank.

Also something else prominent - when I hit 7000 rpm and let go the accelerator, it stalls.

Your fuel consumption sounds like it hasnt been mapped at low load and cruise throttle.

I had a similar problem to you, I had AFRs in the low 11s for cruise (60 - 120kph) and better economy on boost where it was in the 12s - get the car on a dyno to check for sure.

Base timing for S1 R33 is 15deg

base timing for S2 R33 is 20deg though isn't it?

regardless isn't the microtech supposed to read higher than 10deg at idle then?

What I'm asking is - am I correct in assuming that you measure base timing at idle and that the microtech should show the same on its readings?

I'm may have to get it retuned with the base timing advanced?

I've asked someone and the only way you can know the base timing is to look at it on the engine. It is just a little hard to start and with readings of 10deg on initial start and idle it seems suspect to me.

666DAN - I will find out exactly once I have it rutuned full matrix mode. For 12.0 on full boost and 14.5 off boost. This should fix my fuel economy.

A lot of timing lights will show up double the actual timing. I went to set mine to 15 degrees, and it showed up as 30. Which is lucky, because that's where the last mark is on the pulley. If you want to set yours to 20 and your timing light also shows double, you might have to make your own marks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
×
×
  • Create New...