Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this is because they must running ecus like a link or a vipec which doesnt need an afm and uses a map sensor , which i think is installed near the throttle body

for the power fc u require an afm and the z32 is a good choice

Where it should be, at the factory position, turbo inlet.

You'll notice most of the "enthusiasts" (I used that word loosely as most of them don't have a brain) on boostomgcruising will extend their AFM cabling and hook up their AFM on the cold side of their FMIC, totally acceptable provided you retune your aftermarket ECU's injection map as the air is denser, which many if not all never do. I'll leave the rest up to your imagination on why that would do such an exercise on their VL turbos.

A 4inch inlet on a GT30 is only there because its a surge slotted housing....

The actual intake of the turbo would be around 3inches.

So i cant see how a 3 inch Z32 air flow meter would be a restriction....

post-32514-0-55506300-1295230647_thumb.jpg

well in front of the compressor is sea level pressure, and after compressor outlet is boost + sea level pressure, known as psia

yeah i can see how the anti surge slots need a wide snout, but 4" just sounds so big, specifally if you are running 3" std piping after the compressor

well in front of the compressor is sea level pressure, and after compressor outlet is boost + sea level pressure, known as psia

yeah i can see how the anti surge slots need a wide snout, but 4" just sounds so big, specifally if you are running 3" std piping after the compressor

It would actually be under vacuum in front of the compressor and pressure after the outlet...

My point being PV=nRT... So if the pressure increases the volume can decrease to flow the same amount of air :)

Thus you should technically have a larger inlet than cooler piping!

Edited by SimonR32

So a 4-2.5" reducer sitting on the comporessor intake wouldn't be considered a restriction?

depending what size bend you can get you can either put a 4"-3" (2.5" is too small) reducer straight on the turbo and then a 3" pipe to the afm (leave it before the turbo, its not a restriction) or you can run a 4" pipe to the afm and then have a reducer joiner the afm to the pipe (this is what i've done and it works well).

map sensor for the win, the afm pissed me off to no end.

the volume will decrease proportionally provided the temperature doesnt increase, but yeh generally the air is alot denser on the intercooler side, so it makes sense that the inlet side would need a bigger sized pipe to flow the same amount of air, also considering the pressure differential is probably alot smaller on the intake side as well.

Always sounds good in theory but probably only makes a bees dick of difference, although it makes it easier to run a larger air filter which probably helps as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...