Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mafia,

Did you do a compression test when it was cold and also after when it's warmed up?

Possibility the head isn't torqued properly as well, hard to say. Probably popping off the head is your best option (not fun).

Just out of curiosity, how come you torqued them to 80ft/lbs and not 72ft/lbs as per ARP spec?

I had a little piece of paper that came with the studs that said 80ft/lbs on it, so thats what I went to. Will the extra cause an issue?

Shutting down the engine immediatly from hot and checking the plugs should reveal which plug is being steam cleaned, though thats not a fool proof method, as steam cleaning requires some combustion to happen. If the cylinder doesnt fire at all, the plug will just be wet and smell of fuel.

The scope will only spot damage after its happened. Having water in your oil is good enough reason to pull the head off and check the gasket is covering the water and oil passeges properly. Your going to have to do it to fix the issue anyway, so why delay...

Did you do a test alignment of the gasket on the head and the block to make sure it covered the holes?

What kind of gasket did you use?

Was the block decked and the head re-surface before you put the head back on?

Tested the allignment of the gasket, and everything seemed to line up fine, no issues.

Didn't get the head or deck re-surfaced because it was a slapper. I know you're going to call me stupid, but barely checked the flatness of the surfaces. The Engine shop did say the deck was pretty good though. Or good enough I should say.

Mafia,

Did you do a compression test when it was cold and also after when it's warmed up?

Possibility the head isn't torqued properly as well, hard to say. Probably popping off the head is your best option (not fun).

Was still fairly hot \ warm when I did the compression test. Want me to do a cold one? The plugs are still finger tight. Ready to test again.

The head isn't that bad to remove, dropping the turbo off the manifold to the side, disconnecting the inlet pipe, and unplugging the injectors, IAC and the other IAC \ control thing. Then just a matter of dropping the coolant and then cam covers, head bolts, and someone to help you lift it off.

Now, here is a problem, and most of you are probably going to call me a retard (I give you permission to lol).

I realized that I forgot to put in those 3 little bolts. You know. The pricks that are a complete ass to get to when removing the head. And One would think that these allow more seal on the oil drains on the front and back of the head. Water is there too. And since they are oil drains, there is no pressure, and then allowing 13 psi of water into the oil. Probably not much, but enough to create havoc.

*Cowers and waits for the insults*

Edited by The Mafia

You should pressure test the cooling system cold, then warm the engine and do it again.

I wonder if not having the fastners in there is alowing the head to move away from the block (when warm) enough to cause the leak?

Mafia,

Any chance you can put together a list of parts and where you purchased them for the slapper? I'm considering doing this soon as I have just scored a few RB30 Blocks. Not sure if i'd go as far as re ringing and doing the bearings tho for the first block. Second block will be used for a slow build up.

If the paper said 80ft/lbs then thats cool. Unless you used the higher torque from the next grade of studs... Either way I cant see it being an issue.

You probably should pull the head and then clean the gasket and apply hylomar to it and retorque it down. As GTRNUR said, hymolar is fantastic stuff. I've reused the same headgasket three times without any issues :)

Don't beat yourself up for having a go. There are many that wouldnt have gotten as far as you have already, and nobody gets their first engine 100% correct.

A standard graphite syle head gasket will tolerate up to 0.007" of surface variation. Chances are the block was fine, but the heads are rarely perfectly square. The head being alloy tends to take on the distortion of the head gasket and block it was previously bolted too. Its called bruising, and is the main reason heads are shaved, so as to produce a dead flat surface to mate to the block. Having said that, a good coating of hylomar spray on the head gasket would have also guaranteed a seal. When you do re-fit the head, you should give the gasket a good 3 coats a side letting it tack off between coats, so its got an even shade of blue.

The head stud torque will be fine, provided the block was torque plated to the same torque when the finish hones were done. So long as the bolt torque is at the recommended tension, and under the yeild strength of the bolt it will be fine. The blocks hold a hell of a lot of tension. The 1/2" studs in my engine are torqued to 110ft-lb.

thanks GTRNUR. I appreciate your input.

Does anyone know if those 3 little bolts will make all the difference?

I'm thinking of biting the bullet, and just pulling the head - Its might be a "defeat in detail" kind of approach, but I want it to be fixed 100%, and no more guess work.

If I pull the head I can check:

The grub screw

The bores

The gasket (And replace with heaps of hylomar spray)

Install the three little bolts

etc etc

I might even use my spare head - Prep it out of the car, and get it faced.

This "hylomar spray", is it like copper spray?

Hylomar is an ACL product, and its a non-setting high temp silicon base sealant. You get it from supercheap auto or autobarn. Cheap as chips and worth its weight in mur. The acl product is intended for use on copper head gaskets, much like the copper spray, but it is definatly not copper.

Also, I do have a cometic 3 layer 1.3mm head gasket but I was told the surfaces have to be 100% flat for that. So I bought the Durotek 1.3mm graphite with the fire rings.

Definitely couldn't use the cometic?

You normally need a pretty good surface finish to use a mls headgasket. Probably 40RA or finer. Usually with alloy heads/cast iron blocks and mls headgaskets, the finer the finish the better. If you arent getting your head faced, then probably best to not use your mls gasket.

GTRNUR will probably confirm this. After all his development work on his open deck stroker build he would be an expert in this area!

You normally need a pretty good surface finish to use a mls headgasket. Probably 40RA or finer. Usually with alloy heads/cast iron blocks and mls headgaskets, the finer the finish the better. If you arent getting your head faced, then probably best to not use your mls gasket.

GTRNUR will probably confirm this. After all his development work on his open deck stroker build he would be an expert in this area!

Yes I confirm this! I wouldnt consider an MLS gasket unless both surfaces are machined dead flat. Some machineshops use different tooling to shave/deck heads and blocks too. Its worth asking around to see who can do the best surface finish to the highest tolerance. Or just o-ring the cylinders and use a standard gasket and its even better than an MLS gasket.

Not really related to your post but... did you just follow the RB30 guide here on the forum to build your engine? Was there anything missing? I'm considering an RB30, but up til now, biggest job i've done is installing a turbo :P but i have mechanically minded friends who could help

I doubt those 3 little bolts would be an issue, recently when I took off my head on my rb25det I found whoever previously touched it they only put one of those small bolts and didnt put 1 head bolt and I have driven it around for about 100000 with alot of thrashing and the gasket didnt leak or blow.

Ok, so the head has been removed.

Here is the Verdict:

- The Exhaust cam cover at the back was all sludged up with a caramel looking oil \ water.

- The cams were a little sludged up

- I did actually install the two rear little bolts. The front one wasn't installed.

- The head gasket looked like it wasn't sealed properly where the VCT feed is (and grub screwed).

- The bores are still like new and have very prominent hone marks thank f**k.

- Seems the head gasket was the issue all the way, leaking into an oil drain

Resolutions:

- I will check the flatness of the head

- I am thinking if the head doesn't need to be surfaced, I will Defcon the grub screw in to make sure it doesn't leak.

- If the head needs surfacing, I will get the grub screw removed and weld up the head.

- Might look at adjusting the head gasket to suit the gallery a little more

- Will make sure that little bolt at the front is done up nice and tight.

If anyone has anymore tips, I would appreciate anything you can give me.

Thanks again for all of your help here.

GTRNUR was right on the money, thats for sure.

Glad you caught it in time.

I think you'll find a re-surface and some Hylomar will solve all your woes.

Are you planning on doing a full tear down and re-assmelble, or just re-doing the top end? If your going to try just re-doing the top end it is still worth pulling off the main cradle and having a peek at the main bearing journels. Have a look at one or two rod bearing journels as well while your at it. Just so you can restore your confidence in the engine.

  • Like 1

A light spray of Hylomar regardless. Never had an issue doing so, once had an issue not doing so.

And face the head its only $40-50, they give it a bath that will clean all the sludge and crap out of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...