Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi was in united petrol station and noticed 100octain containing 10% ethanol for 5c less then 98ron..

Is this okay to use in my r33 Gts-t ser2? Everyone has their own ideas on this so would like to know facts if anyone knows anything good or bad about 100octain containing 10% ethanol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350701-100-octain-containing-10-ethanol/
Share on other sites

the old shell vpower racing 100octane from shell was 5% ethanol and it was fine in the skyline

you gained zero power but you gained a bucket load of resistance to detonation/knocking

10% ethanol might be a different story and may be enough to alter the AFRs enough that it could be unsafe etc, best to have a workshop who has worked with ethanol comment before using it

i was recomended from my mechanic to that....its meant to be better...but still for some reason i dun always fill tht since the car was tuned when it had 98 from bp and there are only 5 or so of them tht have that fuel in victoria...but whenever i filled it with tht from united, my car didn knock as much (coming from the readings from the hand controller) and didn feel a difference...

so in my opinion it shud be fine...only got benifits out of it when i filled it...less expensive and less knock....

Been running that for about 4 months in my car now...was tuned on that and while there wasn't a noticeable power gain (couple of kw) there was a noticeable drop in knock readings on the PFC across the board...if anything the added detonation resistance is a plus...i don't even bother to run octane booster at events now...

Here they are...got it off their website...the only one i can confirm is the mulgrave on on prinny hwy between westal rd and springvale rd...never been to the other areas with the gtr for me to fill so cant really confirm the actually have them or not..but they claim they do.. :)

[/url]

BAYSWATER 477 Dorset Road 03 9729 0722

CROYDON 338 Dorset Rd 03 9723 8370

HOPPERS CROSSING 160 Old Geelong Road 03 9748 3601

MULGRAVE 2223 Princess Hwy 03 9546 4286 (the one i can get to and fill up from if i do decide i want to go 100 octane)

PATTERSON LAKES 1 Thompson Road 03 9772 1766

POINT COOK 1 Wallace Avenue 03 9931 1430

Hi i spoke to head office of United and i asked if it was okay to use 100octain in my r33 gts-t and he advised me to contact Nissan and ask them..hmmm :/

After speaking to Nissan they advised me that Nissan are against using fuel containing ethanol...and so ill be sticking with 98ron until i find out more.

Thats what they always say...so many of us have been using it for so long with no issues...people are even using E85 with no issues (but that one needs a proper retune with supporting mods)...nissan locally don't always give the right info anyway...

Do you run 100octain from united in your car? have you noticed any power gains and do you get less or more km out of a tank.

Dude read the following replys in this thread

Not so much power gain but as mentioned, better resilience when your engine is under stress.When it was availbale in my area at Shell, I always filled up on it and never had a problem.

i was recomended from my mechanic to that....its meant to be better...but still for some reason i dun always fill tht since the car was tuned when it had 98 from bp and there are only 5 or so of them tht have that fuel in victoria...but whenever i filled it with tht from united, my car didn knock as much (coming from the readings from the hand controller) and didn feel a difference...

so in my opinion it shud be fine...only got benifits out of it when i filled it...less expensive and less knock....

Been running that for about 4 months in my car now...was tuned on that and while there wasn't a noticeable power gain (couple of kw) there was a noticeable drop in knock readings on the PFC across the board...if anything the added detonation resistance is a plus...i don't even bother to run octane booster at events now...

Used the mulgrave one on a few occasions and the bayswater one i used every week as i pass it on the way to work...

Think ur question was answered already...

its safe to use without having to tune the car on it...other than getting less knock (positive point) no other issues have been noticed...

so when u feel comfortable, try it....

Cheers :D

I tried it in my previous turbo car and noticed consistenly worse fuel consumption. This was without getting a custom tune with the fuel of course. About 5L/100km worse.

Noone seems to mention there fuel economy on it but you guys prob dont care haha

for me 5l/100km is freakn ace...:P ill be lucky to see anything close to 10L/100km...lol....i didnt notice any diff in fuel consumption...:P

5L/100km is what a diesel hatch would use haha. I was saying that I had lost around 5L/100km, so I was using around 15L/100km then it dropped to 20L/100km while I used the 5% ethanol shell fuel (without a tune for the fuel).

I tried it in my previous turbo car and noticed consistenly worse fuel consumption. This was without getting a custom tune with the fuel of course. About 5L/100km worse.

Noone seems to mention there fuel economy on it but you guys prob dont care haha

no difference in consumption for me and no knock. good for track days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...