Jump to content
SAU Community

Off Topic: Where's The Cleanest Air In Tasmania?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Apologies for a non-Skyline question....

Trying to help a 20yo with chronic asthma. We figure that parts of Tassie would have clean air although I've read that there's a fair amount of pollution in some places.

Do you have any suggestions about where or where not to live if looking for clean air.

So far (and just guessing), we thought that somewhere south of Hobart would be good (but maybe too remote), or East Coast around St Helens perhaps? What about places like Stanley?

Not worried about cool or cold temperatures, the recent heat and humidity in Melbourne haven't helped.

Thanks in advance,

JohnH

Launceston is a bowl that holds in all the smoke in winter

i have very mild asthma and it doesn't really get me

but someone said that a lot of ppl move from melbourne to qld because the warm temps and high humidity actually helps with asthma

anywhere on the east coast would be good tho

Hi,

I'm in Burnie,

Summers nice and warm (low / mid 30's), but that only last for a few weeks a year,

Winters cold, normally less than 8-9 degrees, snow about 15 minute drive away in winter, beach a few minutes drive the other directing

I been living here all my life, so I think it's a great place,

Job prospects may be a little slim, but it depends what you might be looking after,

if you into manufacturing , boiler maker - wielder, that type of thing, Elephinstone (CAT) are / were putting people on

Nigel

I grew up in the north east (in the bush near derby) and had asthma pretty badly back then, but luckily grew out of it and haven't had an attack since I was about 12-13. Don't be fooled too much by nice little old country areas as a lot of the houses are older and people will be using wood heaters rather than electric in the winters, and in valleys this can sometimes just sit around. I'm pretty certain the west coast of Tassie is considered to have the cleanest air, as it comes straight in from the roaring fourties, but jobs will probably be harder to find.

I would avoid launceston because as pipster11 said it holds the smog in it's little bowl, if you're planning on making frequent city trips Hobart is possibly a better choice. I lived down the huon valley region for a couple of years and we had no problems :)

What is/are your trade(s)? Tassie can sometimes limit your options outside the city pretty quickly if your trade isn't considered blue (or sometimes pink, social worker etc) collar work.

The current plan is to visit the east coast and then head south. And yes, work options will be an issue if he decides to stay... thanks for the replies.

cheers,

JohnH

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My understanding is that UV tends to accelerate the aging process. If the car has been garaged, then you could probably get away with extending beyond 10 years. FWIW, in 2015, I had tyres on my 180B SSS that had a 3-digit code (2 for week, 1 for decade), ending in 0, so could have been more than 30 years old, but still worked fine. I did replaced them very quickly, though, once I discovered what the code meant!
    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
×
×
  • Create New...