Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got it today :D

loving the references to the previous games and the humour, however they did consolise it WAY too much, feels like a port of a 360 game :/

there are also huge discrepancies in the textures; some things look awesome (like the enemies and the chicks), and other things look blurred to the shithouse. Also not a fan of having to wait around during overly long cutscenes when restarting levels etc.

Yeh the worst thing is definitly the waiting times. Especially once you crank it up to the hard difficulties and die a few times.

Still the most fun i have had for a while playing a shooter

Im sure the next one will be a bit better and have a lot better direction from the start.

Way too much time was wasted on this one doing absolutely nothing.

the blur is weird. bit seems intentional. as it becomes more the faster you move. Load times only seem to be a console issue.

i doubt its a Port as the console load times seem to be very excessive, and its made by Gearbox/ex 3D realms guys who obviously went for the nostalgia angle, which means PC all the way.

it's by no means a Crysis2, but i think thats great as it means even peeps without a stonking new uber computer can run it full detail and smoothly, which in turn will hopefully create more players for online madness!!

Played MW2 the other day after playing this........did well, almost won a few games, but it bored/annoyed the crap outta me....lol

Gameplay overhaul patch

I don't know what to say about this but gearbox head honcho has considered the bad reviews and everyone's complaints about dnf; And has confirmed that the team is working on a major overhaul patch.

Sounds kinda stupid after reading the article.

Also, I don't know what to expect anymore.

Gameplay overhaul patch

I don't know what to say about this but gearbox head honcho has considered the bad reviews and everyone's complaints about dnf; And has confirmed that the team is working on a major overhaul patch.

Sounds kinda stupid after reading the article.

Also, I don't know what to expect anymore.

strange i cant seem to find any other sources at all that say anything about a patch. Also a bit funny how its all worded too as i doubt very much the head honcho would talk like that about his game

Gameplay overhaul patch

I don't know what to say about this but gearbox head honcho has considered the bad reviews and everyone's complaints about dnf; And has confirmed that the team is working on a major overhaul patch.

Sounds kinda stupid after reading the article.

Also, I don't know what to expect anymore.

Yeah sounds legit. Did this part not make you think that these guys are trying to do a "the onion" type stories

We had a thought – what if he actually managed to get his hands on some gum? We held a focus group with a whole bunch of gamers and they all gave us one clear, consistent message. Going out and buying gum would be a more entertaining pastime that putting up with the drudgery that is kicking ass in Duke Nukem Forever.

Yeh the worst thing is definitly the waiting times. Especially once you crank it up to the hard difficulties and die a few times.

Still the most fun i have had for a while playing a shooter

Im sure the next one will be a bit better and have a lot better direction from the start.

Way too much time was wasted on this one doing absolutely nothing.

lolwut

sure the next one will be good

IN 46 YEARS WHEN ITS RELEASED

But what investor would give them money after how DNF was essentially roasted in reviews? Bit of a shaky business decision.

Yeah, but Gearbox didn't start from scratch on DNF did they?

If they didn't, they may have earned the benefit of the doubt making a Duke game completely of their own.

I think Gearbox Software brought the Duke Nukem franchise. They got all the devlopment work that 3D Realms did and got Triptych Games (who are ex 3D Realms guys who kept working on DNF) to help them finish the game (also got Piranha Games to help Gearbox with the X360 and PS3 versions)...Gearbox just released what was done with some minor tweaking of their own...

You can tell this game should have been done and released around 1999 (when it should have been) to about 2004.....the graphics are very dated and just looks wrong on today's PC's...

This is basically what happens when George Broussard kept messing around with the game...change engines mid build which would force to start again from scratch and bascially adding stuff in because other games did that just so they can have in DNF...

You can see why Take-Two Interactive got pissed of with 3D Realms was doing and finally had enough....took DNF from them gave it to Gearbox and pretty much said "Give it a small tweak...and release the damn thing"

I would say that Gearbox will do something good with the Duke Nukem franchise...let's just hope it doesn't take another 14 years for the next one to come out

Edited by BigDirtyJase

Yeah, but Gearbox didn't start from scratch on DNF did they?

If they didn't, they may have earned the benefit of the doubt making a Duke game completely of their own.

Oh I don't doubt that at all. From what I understand, Gearbox basically finished off what 3DRealms had done and made it how they (3DR) wanted it, and then released it. They just supplied the grunt, as it were.

In their own right though, they might be able to come up with something awesome; who knows? And while I hope a lot of people/investors realise this, you've gotta admit there'll be a lot of people very wary and maybe not willing to give them a go, just being cautious.

If they manage to get another DN game out and it's actually good, then they'll blow everyone's socks off.

  • 2 weeks later...

Graphics are shit. Compared to say BFBC2 or other current games (or even games from 2-3 years ago), the graphics are plain shit. Gameplay is quite enjoyable.

Downloaded it from bitsoup.org

Screw paying for games haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...