Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I will run the same width rim with the same offset but I will run a 225/40 R19 instead. This tyre will give me almost the exact same rolling diameter as the stock wheel and tyre with some nice stretch :)

Yep that would be ideal. Only reason I didn't go that size is because I didn't want to be cop bait. The KU31's have no sidewall protection as it is, let alone when stretched on!

lol i regret not modding my stag more, but stopped due to your cop bait theory.

face it its a family wagon, its the furthest thing from cop bait there is. and i live in vic!

stretch those tyres.

and those wheels sit perfect! you've done well

I will run the same width rim with the same offset but I will run a 225/40 R19 instead. This tyre will give me almost the exact same rolling diameter as the stock wheel and tyre with some nice stretch :)

225's on a 9.5" wide rim?

Really?

I don't understand why anyone would want to run the exact same rolling diameter as the stock wheel and tyres.blink.gif

The speedo is out by miles and they look tiny in the wheelarches.

The car will handle like a bucket of shit; because the already too short sidewalls are now being given yet another job to do.

On a 1200kg Silvia tyre stretch might work (handling wise), on a 1700-1800kg wagon; not so sure. You're more likely to pull the tyre off the bead if you strike a bump; mid corner.

Theo only reason I can see for stretching rubber; is if the rim seriously won't fit under the guard with appropriately sized rubber on it (insert ghey stanced website name here) . The above offset and width with an appropriate tyre actually will fit.

But that's just one mans opinion.

Edited by Daleo

I don't understand why anyone would want to run the exact same rolling diameter as the stock wheel and tyres.blink.gif

The speedo is out by miles and they look tiny in the wheelarches.

The car will handle like a bucket of shit; because the already too short sidewalls are now being given yet another job to do.

On a 1200kg Silvia tyre stretch might work (handling wise), on a 1700-1800kg wagon; not so sure. You're more likely to pull the tyre off the bead if you strike a bump; mid corner.

But that's just one mans opinion.

your right. i didnt see 225 lol..

235 at max.. hell i had 245 on my 8.5 inch axis hiros on the stag. and they looked the perfect size

your right. i didnt see 225 lol..

235 at max.. hell i had 245 on my 8.5 inch axis hiros on the stag. and they looked the perfect size

Yep, running 245/45/18 on my 8" 350GT rims; straight sidewall. On a 9" 245 is perfect.

But I'm not a hipster.

that^^^^^^^^cheers.gif

not getting into this debate.......most of you know my feelings on stretched or really low profile rubber on heavy cars!spank.gif....unless its for stance!

Edited by Jetwreck

Yep, running 245/45/18 on my 8" 350GT rims; straight sidewall. On a 9" 245 is perfect.

But I'm not a hipster.

On a 9" a 245 would be straight, honestly there's such little stretch in my setup it's only noticeable if you're looking for it. Certainly not obvious.

How far out is the speedo out on our cars? From memory my size made me something like 1.7% too fast from the standard 17" tyre size. Still when I'm sitting on 60km/h people are passing me.

Edited by jasevr4

On a 9" a 245 would be straight, honestly there's such little stretch in my setup it's only noticeable if you're looking for it. Certainly not obvious.

245's are fine......with the profile you have it should be pretty good.

oops....I forgot....I'm out of this debate.

Edited by Jetwreck

245's are fine......with the profile you have it should be pretty good.

oops....I forgot....I'm out of this debate.

haha no debate from me. Wheels/tyres are personal preference. Mine is looks, clearly overkill for the power mine is making.

Fitment looks the goods Jase.

I run a 245/45-18 on my 18x9+30 and find the ride is great at absorbing bumps nicely and the slightly taller than stock tyre has my speedo within 2km. I dd take a while to get used to the side wall but now I find it looks great.

On a 9" a 245 would be straight, honestly there's such little stretch in my setup it's only noticeable if you're looking for it. Certainly not obvious.

How far out is the speedo out on our cars? From memory my size made me something like 1.7% too fast from the standard 17" tyre size. Still when I'm sitting on 60km/h people are passing me.

I reckon yours looks spot on actually.thumbsup.gif

On OEM 17's, at 110km/h; my speedo was out by 11km/h, so that's 10%, monumental pain in the arse. My error is now around 3-4%.

Yep, running 245/45/18 on my 8" 350GT rims; straight sidewall. On a 9" 245 is perfect.

But I'm not a hipster.

yeh on the sil i have 245s on the 9".. car doesnt act like its on Mc'donalds trays anymore which is great

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...