Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The real problem here is that no one has called Nissan to inform them of their design flaw.

They clearly over spent on the much more expensive 2 piece design when they could have saved all that money making 1 piece shafts.

Forget engineering rules. This is obviously an oversight on their behalf. Someone should notify them

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

If you aren't having a problem with the shaft you have, why change it?

You will feel a vibration before anything worse happens.

It also depends on the material it's made from and how it was made (which is explained in detail in this thread).

If your shaft maker has made it from the correct material for the length and diameter then it might be perfectly fine

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

Steel does not have a fatigue life, it has a fatigue limit and as long as it is operated at a stress level below this then it should last for an unlimited no. of cycles.

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

6000 tail shaft rpm is the same as 6000 crankshaft rpm in 4th gear.

That's 111km/hr I'm pretty sure.

i think 4th at 6000 is around 165 ish km/h (with 4.3 diff)

Yeah my bad. I'm using an imperial calculator and that's MPH not KM/H.

So with a 4.11:1 it's 178km/h at 6000rpm on a 235/45/17 and 170km/h on a 4.3:1

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

post-80095-0-65041300-1347274507_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-09720100-1347274551_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-95989600-1347274574_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-10525700-1347274645_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-11672800-1347274667_thumb.jpg

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

Yeah I popped it out to flare it a little, id like to keep it on, but if it gets in the way still, ill machine up a s/s one the right size ;)

This is what happens to a single piece tailshaft at 8,300RPM. Its in an AE86 so the tailshaft isn't exactly all that long either. Guy had a tailshaft loop as well, it ripped it clean out, took half the gearbox out with it along with the shifter and the fuel lines. Punched 4x big holes in the floor.

There is another guy here in SA that had a Cefiro. Freshly built car, new very expensive engine, clutch, gearbox etc etc.

Tailshaft failed in 4th gear when he attempted his scando into turn one at Mallala. The shock was so severe to the car that it the car actually buckled, destroyed the gearbox and engine. Car was pretty much gone because of a failed tailshaft.

I for one, will not be putting my single piece shaft back in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...