Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The real problem here is that no one has called Nissan to inform them of their design flaw.

They clearly over spent on the much more expensive 2 piece design when they could have saved all that money making 1 piece shafts.

Forget engineering rules. This is obviously an oversight on their behalf. Someone should notify them

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

If you aren't having a problem with the shaft you have, why change it?

You will feel a vibration before anything worse happens.

It also depends on the material it's made from and how it was made (which is explained in detail in this thread).

If your shaft maker has made it from the correct material for the length and diameter then it might be perfectly fine

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

Steel does not have a fatigue life, it has a fatigue limit and as long as it is operated at a stress level below this then it should last for an unlimited no. of cycles.

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

6000 tail shaft rpm is the same as 6000 crankshaft rpm in 4th gear.

That's 111km/hr I'm pretty sure.

i think 4th at 6000 is around 165 ish km/h (with 4.3 diff)

Yeah my bad. I'm using an imperial calculator and that's MPH not KM/H.

So with a 4.11:1 it's 178km/h at 6000rpm on a 235/45/17 and 170km/h on a 4.3:1

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

post-80095-0-65041300-1347274507_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-09720100-1347274551_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-95989600-1347274574_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-10525700-1347274645_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-11672800-1347274667_thumb.jpg

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

Yeah I popped it out to flare it a little, id like to keep it on, but if it gets in the way still, ill machine up a s/s one the right size ;)

This is what happens to a single piece tailshaft at 8,300RPM. Its in an AE86 so the tailshaft isn't exactly all that long either. Guy had a tailshaft loop as well, it ripped it clean out, took half the gearbox out with it along with the shifter and the fuel lines. Punched 4x big holes in the floor.

There is another guy here in SA that had a Cefiro. Freshly built car, new very expensive engine, clutch, gearbox etc etc.

Tailshaft failed in 4th gear when he attempted his scando into turn one at Mallala. The shock was so severe to the car that it the car actually buckled, destroyed the gearbox and engine. Car was pretty much gone because of a failed tailshaft.

I for one, will not be putting my single piece shaft back in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just as long as it's not those putridly disappointing RE003s.
    • I had this same experience going from a set of no name tyres that were on a set of good wheels (Enkei RPFs) to some Potenza RE-11s (this was a few years ago). The wet grip in particular was so much higher that it was almost scary considering how dangerous the old tyres were in comparison. The expense of the tyres also made me want them to last longer so drove accordingly. Wife happy. So now she only 'lets' me buy some flavour of Brigestones...
    • This. All of this. I am turning >$300 into small particles inside 20k km, because I like to be able to roll around any 90° street corner at the speed limit. Would my car be more fun with cheaper tyres? Possibly. When I swapped out the bald AD09s for new ones, the change in the car was massive. The obvious one was being able to put the power down instead of lighting up into silly wheelspin. But the corollary of that was that the lateral traction went from being fun to fast. It was more fun when it was loose. But the corollary to the corollary is that if I need to dodge a child in the road or emergency brake to avoid the arsehat who has just tipped a GWM on its side in front of me, then I've got a much better chance of that manoeuvre coming off without unintended "fun" meaning that I hit something else, or the original target.
    • Every time I have to buy new tyres I question what actual difference it makes between running $40 tyres and $300 tyres and whether it's worth it. Because that's a massive difference to the wallet. But then I did go to a driving training at some point which also included emergency braking and swerving in the wet. In part I think it was meant to show people how bad it gets. Funnily enough what I took away from it is that I can go much harder than I thought in my car. I presume mostly because of decent tyres. Some of the other cars there were shocking to behold. And a bit scary that cheap tyres are probably a lot more common on the road than decent ones  
    • I'm pretty sure that is just straight AI generated word soup, where did you receive that ad (facebook)? They misspell Pirelli twice, no human eyes looked at that before it was posted. Incidentally, I am running the chinese pirellis on my V37 and they are.....OK....I didn't go looking for them, they were just what the shop had in stock in the tall size that car needs. LIke any brand, you really can't trust the brand's reputation to apply to every product they produce. Pirelli make good and crap tyres, all with the same logo stamped on them, and all with an attempt at price premium due to the brand
×
×
  • Create New...