Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The real problem here is that no one has called Nissan to inform them of their design flaw.

They clearly over spent on the much more expensive 2 piece design when they could have saved all that money making 1 piece shafts.

Forget engineering rules. This is obviously an oversight on their behalf. Someone should notify them

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

If you aren't having a problem with the shaft you have, why change it?

You will feel a vibration before anything worse happens.

It also depends on the material it's made from and how it was made (which is explained in detail in this thread).

If your shaft maker has made it from the correct material for the length and diameter then it might be perfectly fine

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

Steel does not have a fatigue life, it has a fatigue limit and as long as it is operated at a stress level below this then it should last for an unlimited no. of cycles.

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

6000 tail shaft rpm is the same as 6000 crankshaft rpm in 4th gear.

That's 111km/hr I'm pretty sure.

i think 4th at 6000 is around 165 ish km/h (with 4.3 diff)

Yeah my bad. I'm using an imperial calculator and that's MPH not KM/H.

So with a 4.11:1 it's 178km/h at 6000rpm on a 235/45/17 and 170km/h on a 4.3:1

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

post-80095-0-65041300-1347274507_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-09720100-1347274551_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-95989600-1347274574_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-10525700-1347274645_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-11672800-1347274667_thumb.jpg

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

Yeah I popped it out to flare it a little, id like to keep it on, but if it gets in the way still, ill machine up a s/s one the right size ;)

This is what happens to a single piece tailshaft at 8,300RPM. Its in an AE86 so the tailshaft isn't exactly all that long either. Guy had a tailshaft loop as well, it ripped it clean out, took half the gearbox out with it along with the shifter and the fuel lines. Punched 4x big holes in the floor.

There is another guy here in SA that had a Cefiro. Freshly built car, new very expensive engine, clutch, gearbox etc etc.

Tailshaft failed in 4th gear when he attempted his scando into turn one at Mallala. The shock was so severe to the car that it the car actually buckled, destroyed the gearbox and engine. Car was pretty much gone because of a failed tailshaft.

I for one, will not be putting my single piece shaft back in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...