Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Talked to the Link factory in regards to high revving RB26s and they say they reccommend an alternative triggering system. Doesn't apply to me as my RB30 won't be going over 6800 so I don't know what people are doing but there are two or three different approaches. I read about a year or so ago that Unigroup had such an alterrnative triggering system?

The Unigroup one is the one they developed with Ross. $2k (plus $1k fitting). It's happening in my car and another on here at 5500, so well before high revs.

I'm going to talk to CRD again today to see if I can find out more about what they do.

Edited by Scooby

mark - the way you fix your issue is take it to crd :)

a few of us here have heard this timing issue more than a few times with unigroup, however, jim @ crd has NEVER raised this sort of glitch with my setup (food for thought)

ive heard very good things about yavus though

Interesting read, I've never had this problem because my old R33 wasn't a power house, but I'm imagining that because of the massive ramp in RPM, the alternator could be producing sht loads of current and the rectifier isn't keeping the voltage flat.

Perhaps try soldering an inline capacitor to the +ve of the CAS or just run a big car audio capacitor to minimise voltage fluctuation.

Hope that helps.

Imagine people were just soldering on capacitors? $2 piece of silicon charging $500+

I don't think it's so much electrical interference as it is physical 'noise'. cas is rotating fast and if a bit worn etc gets problems. the other side of it is the type of ECU being used. some are definitely more prone than others. there is a cheap trigger disk solution, or the best fix is the crank damper pick-up but as stated above it's not cheap.

  On 27/01/2011 at 8:33 PM, Scooby said:

The Unigroup one is the one they developed with Ross. $2k (plus $1k fitting). It's happening in my car and another on here at 5500, so well before high revs.

I'm going to talk to CRD again today to see if I can find out more about what they do.

Is this what price im looking at to get my CAS fixed..? :S or is this a new one?

Edited by Aleckr33

The symptoms are described here in a thread from the Haltech forum:

http://forums.haltech.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=28152

and here

http://ljracing.co.nz/

Spoke to Haltech today, they said that their Platinum ecu has no problem handling the Nissan CAS signal but they're aware that some ecus do. Also read that somewhere that one got their hands on the patent for the Nissan CAS signal sensing and it was very impressive in terms of sophistication, so could probably work well with a 360 slot CAS trigger wheel.

Also Mark from Godzilla was as always very helpful, he hasn't invested in the trigger disc solution but has heard of it and was talking to Speedtech NZ who apparently have trigger discs made up. Then it's just a matter of telling the ecu to run 12+1 or 24+1 depending upon the wheel. Irrspective of who's solution it is, modifying the CAS can't be much mre complicated than that as there's not much in there.

Yeah Marko there's no doubt that CRD will know what to do, but I like to have some idea of what's being done to my car for future reference, no matter who does it, and at the moment they're not giving anything away. Respect their position but hey, it's my car.

Richard you refer to a cheap fix but do you know anyone who actually does this in Sydney?

Jack thanks for the tip re Red R, I'll get in touch.

Aleck no mate that's for a full crank trigger system that's good probably good for 10k ish rpm plus. Hence why I'm after what appears to be cheap and effective solution.

Edited by Scooby
  On 27/01/2011 at 11:00 AM, STATUS said:

could the trend be the ecu thats being used?

Most of the trigger issues are with particular ecu's not liking the nissan pattern.

Maybe post the ecu's (and engine combo) that are having the issues?

I can say its not inherent in nissan CAS's especially in these cars which are being mentioned.

A simple way to tell would be to just an oscilloscope on the CAS signal and see what it looks like at 7000rpm pre and post loom, if its clean on both then the issue must lie with the ECU.

Quick update, used another CAS and got to 6k rpm before the scatter appeared. As per Jack's suggestion got in touch with Red R Racing, Paul was very helpful and is sending down a CAS with a 24 (?) slot trigger wheel to try so looking forward to the results. Will post again when results are known.

  On 04/02/2011 at 10:43 AM, Scooby said:

Quick update, used another CAS and got to 6k rpm before the scatter appeared. As per Jack's suggestion got in touch with Red R Racing, Paul was very helpful and is sending down a CAS with a 24 (?) slot trigger wheel to try so looking forward to the results. Will post again when results are known.

Good stuff mate, it will be interesting to see if it eliminates the problem.

Keep us updated......

steam ftw

  On 27/01/2011 at 4:52 PM, D_Stirls said:

i have heard of CA's having the same problem, there is a data log file in the Haltech formus that shows the CAS signal from a CA that was inflicted with this issue.

EDIT!! Here is it.

logg497whpgv4.jpg

Wow, I really didn't think this was a topic that was soo miss understood.

Timing jitter is something that has plagued RB engines since the dawn of time. The worst is the 30 single cam.

Now fact of the matter is, you are measuring the crank off the camshaft. Now between the crank and the cam sensor we have......

A bearing that the sensor shaft runs on.

The shaft it self that goes in the camshaft.

A rubber belt.

Now, there is an easy way to diagnose if you have timing jitter. Lock your ignition timing. Grab a timing light and slowly rev your engine..... and watch the timing.

You will see as your belt gets harmonic vibrations so will your timing. Every RB does it. Just some do it worse than others.

Now, there are some fixes. using a dual pulse disk can help. It basically dumbs down the CAS so its not as accurate but helps jitter.

The best option is measure the crank off the crank. I have just been involved in making a bolt on billet kit for RB series engines. We started with a 72+1 then tried 72+1 with a missing tooth.

The problem we had was the sensor we where using wasn't fast enough to read it at 9000+ rpm.

We ended up with a 24+1 setup so RPM is never an issue and still more than enough teeth for accuracy.

I have personally seen engines sooooo bad that the timing marks disappear off the balancer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 馃檪 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
  • Create New...