Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I always shoot in full manual

First time shooting at night with my prime lense. Had some issues with focus but these two seemed ok. Might be how they are resized like you said. The lense is pretty sensitive to what is in and out of focus but so I may have been just a bit off

I always shoot in full manual

First time shooting at night with my prime lense. Had some issues with focus but these two seemed ok. Might be how they are resized like you said. The lense is pretty sensitive to what is in and out of focus but so I may have been just a bit off

the second one is in focus, the focus point is the rear windscreen tho.

with the first one turn the car wheels so the face of the rim is facing the camera instead of the tyre ;)

its not as in focus either. maybe try stopping the lens down a bit more too as 1.8 open wide isnt always that great for car shots as the DOF is a bit too small except for detail shots.

still pretty cool though, wish i wasnt so lazy keen as to do night photos but never have the motivation to get out there and do it, lol.

Edited by Jay019

Ah ok, Maybe thats my problem

Last time I took car shots at night they had alot of noise and I realised afterwards I had my ISO right up (whoops). So the photos looked alright on the little camera screen but as soon as they went on a laptop there was far to much noise in them. Beginner mistake, something I should have relised but oh well...

I Think thats why I was overcompansating with the lowest ISO I could use and adjusting the apature right down So I wouldnt have to drop the shutter speed (If I'm further off doing the right thing then I relise here I'm happy to take some constructive critisism, ISO was at about 400, Apature at 1.8 and shutter speed was between 1/20 and 1/40 or around abouts. Like I said but I overcompansated with the ISO cause of last time)

Ill put another 2 photos from the night up. The Lighting in the Skyline one isnt right, but Its a bit better focused. The one of the monaro I think suffers from the same issues as the above photos but not as bad (now that you guys bought it to my attention lol...)

SPY33Front.jpg

MonaroRear2.jpg

Like I said I'm open to critisism, I dont mind these photos but I know there a long long way from alot of you guys in here. But I'm willing to learn and try out different shooting methods. I like to think I'm slowly improving lol

Thanks

P.S. That first photo of my car where you said the wheels are facing the wrong way..... I was parked Illegally in the middle of a road so just ran out to grab a photo before anyone came haha. Should have thought about the angle of the wheels in alot of these photos but I was being pretty lazy on the night

Edited by 89CAL

Here's some I took at Circuit Club's Twilight event last Thursday night.

Here's Matt:

IMG_1751.jpg

Some random S2k in the next garage:

IMG_1753.jpg

IMG_1756.jpg

A really nice Evo also sharing the next garage (and "Aggroman" Dave in his R34):

IMG_1760.jpg

IMG_1761.jpg

"Pezhead" Eric's engine:

IMG_1757.jpg

And Dave's R34 again:

IMG_1764.jpg

IMG_1787.jpg

along with the man himself (kinda :P ) as well as Eric giving Dave some pro tips:

IMG_1752.jpg

Sorry about your loss mate.

We've had her about 7 years and she was living in a friends front yard, so she doesn't lay too often these days. Still get a few, if we can find them :P The dog usually follows her around, they're good friends! Lol

Damn I'm hot in a helmet. When you can't see my face i reckon i have a pretty good to average looking face ;)

Hahaha - for a second there I thought you had some crazy weird fluffy animal hanging from the front mirror :P

Ps two taken during our Simpson Desert trip last year:

5481004451_2c0dcb5aa9.jpg

Dingo Tracks by ZENN0N, on Flickr

5485293634_21f20d746d_z.jpg

Staring into the desert by ZENN0N, on Flickr

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...