Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi, i am going to look at an r32 gts-t, and it apparently has a rb25 motor and gearbox in it.

i am a bit suspect as to if he is telling the truth and would just like to know of the obvious tell tail signs as to which motor it has.

please no answers like ones a 2L and one a 2.5L

what i know and correct me if i'm wrong and please add anything YOUR HELP WILL BE MUCH APPRECIATED

rb20det:

vlave cover is flat the whole way across

intake runners (flatter at the top than rb25)

no bump on timing cover on intake side

rb25det:

valve cover is raised towards the back

intake runners are slightly higher and not flat across the top

bump/petrusion on timing belt cover on intake side

and i know nothing about the difference between the rb25de+t and a rb25det (please tell me that too if known)

i am ok in telling the difference between the gearboxes as they are completely different in size rb25 1 being alot larger

and the differences between r33 gts-t diff and a r32 gts-t diff if any

Edited by adam999111

RB20DET: mostly as you said.. flat cam covers, no bulge in cam belt cover (bulge is for VCT solenoid). Later RB20's actually say RB20 on the cam belt cover. Intake runners, where the top half of the manifold bolts to the runners, the RB20's last two runners are offset from the front 4.

RB25DET: cam covers have raised sections at the rear, cam belt cover has bulge for VCT, will also be a VCT solenoid on the intake side of the head, just behind the cam belt cover (at least that's where it is on my Neo).

RB25DE: If it's from an R32 it will look pretty much like an RB20 (no VCT), if it's from an R33 it will have VCT.

I doubt you would be able to visually tell whether it's an RB25DE+T or a straight up RB25DET.

You could always get an extendy mirror thing and have a look at the engine number..

yeh thanks,

at least thats cleared it up a little, im not to keen on engine numbers as people generally restamp them if they change motors but i will be also be checking that too.

ALSO: would you know the difference between an r32 gts-t diff and a r33 gts-t diff

from what i have read on the net and here they are both r200 diffs just with a different gear ratio 4.33 and 4.11 respectively.

are is one weaker than the other or they same strength?

It's pretty hard to grind back an engine number enough to restamp it, people generally only stamp the old numbers on a brand new block.

There should also be a cast engine model (RB20 etc) on the exhaust side of the block, below the manifold and pretty much on cyl.1

As for the diffs, they are pretty much the same.

AFAIK standard manual 32gtst diffs are 4.3ish:1 (32gtr's are 4.1:1) while 33gtst manuals are 4.1:1

Gearboxes on the other hand... the R33 GTSt has a FAR superior gearbox, if the car has had an RB25 conversion then I would hope it has the gearbox as well.. to put an RB25t gearbox in my car (including a custom tailshaft, new slave cylinder AND doing the work myself) was a $2.5k adventure.

yeh i hope he has done the gearbox also (he said he has).

as with the engine numbers lets say that i know someone that has grinded back the numbers on an rb30 and restamped the 25 numbers on it for a 30/25 conversion to pass the pits when getting registered

Nice, I didn't bother, they licensed my 3L pretty easily.

Do you know the visual differences between the boxes? The RB25t box is considerably larger than the RB20 box, you should be able to see some modifications to the gearbox crossmember and also the slave cylinder and speedo drive are different orientations (sorry, can't remember which way though)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...