Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was on the lower half of empty yesterday and the car kept dieing down and then surging forward like it was about to die.

No light came on, where is it supposed to be on 33's?

Edited by miguelegant

when does the fuel light come on? when theres 20L left in the tank, are stock tanks 65L for the r34?

i refuelled today, with city driving and heavy right foot i average 16L per 100kms, today i can proudly say there is nothing wrong with the fuel consumption of my car as it averages 11.40L/100km WITH city driving, a restricted right foot and the once off flooring!

yes they all have a fuel light. it may be blown though (or there is a short in the system or issue with the sender). but they generally all come on with about 10L left in the tank, so if you are filling up with less than around 55L then you aren't getting the tank low enough for the light to come on. there are a few ways to test if the light is working. 1 is to pull the return line off the injector rail and run it into a bucket then run the car until it either runs out of fuel or the light comes on (best to do when the car is low on fuel). another would be to pull the fuel gauge sender out of the tank. yet another would be to figure out which wire in the fuel sender wiring is the one that sends the signal to the dash and short it out and see if the light comes on. or you could simply drive around with a few litres of fuel in a jerry can and just keep driving until either the light comes on or you run out of fuel.

i also have a feeling that in the 33's it doesn't come on until below the line. i don't think mine came on until it was at the top of the E

cheers for that, shall have a look on the weekend. ive had the fuel guage sit dead on the E line without the light coming on. then again i only got 49L into it on fill up

Yep also gotta say today with it real low in the tank, going around corner the car started to splutter and almost stall as the fuel sloshed around in the tank, don't know if that's got to do with the fuel pump not pulling enough or not but no fuel light came on thats for sure.

i know it's not a commodore, but i'd posted in here before about the fuel economy of my VT commodore and how the best i'd gotten was 8.74L/100kms. this was on E10. i put a tank of 91 octane in it last week. filled up tonight on my way home. 8.24L/100kms. that tank was only driving to and from work, which is mostly highway driving. if the mornings weren't quite so cold (been a few 5 degree mornings) or the car was kept in a garage and not out in the front yard then the economy would be a bit better since the car would come up to temp a little bit quicker. as it is, on the way to work the car doesn't come to temp until i reach the edge of town (about 7 kms away), so the part of the trip that is start/stop is also the part of the trip where the car is running the richest.

  • 1 month later...

Just had a pod filter installed and changed the coilpacks about 1 month ago, after the pod filter change and controlled sensible driving, I managed 11.03L/100km. O2 sensor working fine, I'm happy, I could perhaps even turn it down more and become a granny driver and maybe I'll get 9-10L per 100km who knows

Full tank estimate: 700km

I get constantly 12.5 - 13.5L/100km for normal driving (mix of city & high/freeway)

Lowest I have seen is ~10L/100km & that is country driving & sitting at 110-120km for ~400kms.

Car is an automatic so that probably chews more fuel compared to the manual counter parts.

Might go & change the spark plugs (haven't being changed for ~35,000kms) & give the POD a clean as it is covered with shit & dirt atm... :whistling:

  • 3 weeks later...

when does the fuel light come on? when theres 20L left in the tank, are stock tanks 65L for the r34?

i refuelled today, with city driving and heavy right foot i average 16L per 100kms, today i can proudly say there is nothing wrong with the fuel consumption of my car as it averages 11.40L/100km WITH city driving, a restricted right foot and the once off flooring!

R34 sedans (not sure about coupes) have 65L fuel tanks.

If you change your O2 sensor, clean the AFM and have a new air filter - you should be able to have economy around 10.5L to 11L/100km urban.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...