Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I still don't understand if "money isn't a problem" why on earth you are using a R31?

Same reason that chick wants to drop a 40k V8 or whatever into a R31 :D

tbh the Spool kit is something I'd steer clear of, most of the kits I've seen use I-beams but they use H-beams, and there was a fair bit of clearancing at the bottom of the combustion chamber. I did look into those RIPS motors..

and lol i didn't actually say money is no object, the budget is $20k for a running, driveable car (though massive power and driveable on street rarely go in the same sentence tbh)

i thought about the RIPS, it revs to 9K, I could get a Nitto stroker kit with an RB30 block for the same rated at 1600hp and 12k rpm max though?

First of all, making comments about I & H like that, clearly you do not know what you are talking about.

The debate will run forever about which is best.

Its application dependant, simple as that

hmmm all valid points, and yeah the whole thing about RB cranks is right, I think that Nitto thing may end up being the way I go with an RB26 head, those stroker kits are nuts with a 12k rpm limiter, and means I can run a retardedly oversized turbo haha

Again no ideas. What are you worried about cranks for?

20k budget wont even get your head to 10,000rpm. Let alone 12,000

So I wouldn't be getting too excited on which stroker etc.

Realistically to even sit @ 9,000rpm reliably your budget has already been blown out of the water before you start as there is probably 5k in the head alone.

20k on the street/running is as simple as a 25/30 with a mild freshen up of the bottom end etc.

Otherwise you go chasing super big power and RPM everything from the gearbox to diff & driveshafts needs attention. Then there is getting it to the ground etc etc. Just in driveline you'd be looking at the 8-10k mark.

tbh the Spool kit is something I'd steer clear of, most of the kits I've seen use I-beams but they use H-beams, and there was a fair bit of clearancing at the bottom of the combustion chamber. I did look into those RIPS motors..

and lol i didn't actually say money is no object, the budget is $20k for a running, driveable car (though massive power and driveable on street rarely go in the same sentence tbh)

i thought about the RIPS, it revs to 9K, I could get a Nitto stroker kit with an RB30 block for the same rated at 1600hp and 12k rpm max though?

like nismoid said, and i said before you posted this.

a Nitto stroker is out of the question.

youre looking at 15k for the 3.2 assembled with oilpump,sump etc..(or external pump)

because youd want 2-3k worth of block prep if youre looking to utilize that kit.

30k would get you a 3.2l long engine...then you can use your 20k to buy the bolt on bits.

then you'll need a clutch,gearbox.... its really just pointless for you.

build a 26 or a 26/30, youre saving yourself 5k just for not having a stroker crank.

10k for the engine, 10k for the bolt on parts (turbo setup, fuel system, ecu, tune...if u shop wisely.

and i'll also add, that a 3l bottom end was an alternative to stroking a 26, so its still a stroker motor if you want that

Edited by jangles

Lol fattox

If H beams are so bad there's a lot of manufacturers that you'd better go and tell!

Also, are you going to have 1600hp?

Are you going to spend the mega bucks to allow you to spin it to 12,000rpm safely?

Even 9000rpm is a lot for a street driven car. A well matched turbo to suit whatever bottom end you go with will make it a fast car. No point having a T51RSPL that comes on at 6000rpm when the car next to you has a responsive and linear powerband as that car will be further down the road by the time you bring it on between corners/sets of lights.

It's just plain fkn stupid to buy something based on numbers which are unrealistic for what you're going to use it for.

Sure all the parts in question are quality etc and lots of supporters for all different brands but FFS go talk to a machinist with experience and listen to what they have to say

This is just going to be a dyno-queen?

Initial cost of R31... what, $1k?

If it isn't... what brakes are you using the on 31? $2k+ right there DIY

Then all the other ancillaries such as rims/tyres/suspension is going to cost you another $3k on the cheap

Turbocharger in itself will cost you over $1k

Exhaust system to suit big hp is another $1k

Gearbox to hold that power? R33 manual box with all the crap fitted (not sure about tailshaft interchangeability) $1k

Injectors? $500+ for some used big 700cc+

If you do stuff on the cheap you might be able to get away with $20k and all the labour yourself... I'd buy a R32 GTR for that price and have a reliable daily, track weapon and you can get well over 350rwhp with them with stock turbos. I had two R31's and as much as my heart is with them... and I HATE my whale R33, I still have to say the R33 is such a nicer car to get around with.

Still want to change to an R32 though... but I have no RB20 love =(

This is just going to be a dyno-queen?

Initial cost of R31... what, $1k?

If it isn't... what brakes are you using the on 31? $2k+ right there DIY

Then all the other ancillaries such as rims/tyres/suspension is going to cost you another $3k on the cheap

Turbocharger in itself will cost you over $1k

Exhaust system to suit big hp is another $1k

Gearbox to hold that power? R33 manual box with all the crap fitted (not sure about tailshaft interchangeability) $1k

Injectors? $500+ for some used big 700cc+

If you do stuff on the cheap you might be able to get away with $20k and all the labour yourself... I'd buy a R32 GTR for that price and have a reliable daily, track weapon and you can get well over 350rwhp with them with stock turbos. I had two R31's and as much as my heart is with them... and I HATE my whale R33, I still have to say the R33 is such a nicer car to get around with.

Still want to change to an R32 though... but I have no RB20 love =(

that there is the reason im guessing he doesnt buy a R32 GTR,

because he wants to build a motor for his R31,

if you were to buy a R32 you'd put a RB25 in it

Hey guys,

What does everyone think in regards to going with a hybrid motor aka rb25/30, or going with a stroker and rb26 head?

The main build plan is just for a dirty old r31 with a big dash of sleep =D then take it to dyno days and snap ridiculous boost into it, see how well it takes it

Myself building it, with a good mate who's a qualified mechanic (and knows RB's pretty well)

Opinions? I'm not overly a fan of the rb25/30, the plan was a stroker with rb26 head as the 26's love revving more, but i'm interested to see what people have to say?

2JZ?

/end of thread. ;)

The RB25 (non NEO) head is very understated. Bigger ports than a 26, has VCT. The only thing that lets it down would be the hydraulic lifters if you are planning on revving it past 8500rpm.

Won't cost that much to chuck some 2nd hand solid lifters in there surely?

fck. I didn't know H beams were bad? I better tell tomei to stop making conrods. their H beams have taken up to 200hp PER CYLINDER but I guess 1200hp is not much when you're after a 5 litre RB engine that can rev to 15,000rpm. would love to post more but want to get home to remove the tomei h beams from my engine before it blows. maybe I can replace them with some Chinese made I beams which are bound to be superior?

fck. I didn't know H beams were bad? I better tell tomei to stop making conrods. their H beams have taken up to 200hp PER CYLINDER but I guess 1200hp is not much when you're after a 5 litre RB engine that can rev to 15,000rpm. would love to post more but want to get home to remove the tomei h beams from my engine before it blows. maybe I can replace them with some Chinese made I beams which are bound to be superior?

Just to put your mind at rest I'll take those shitty old h beams off your hands baron. :whistling:

  • Nope 1

What are the main reasons manufacturing wise to go H or I beam? pros and cons?

edit: a quick google says tensile vs loading, so basically high rpm suits one design and high pressure lower rpm suits others.

Edited by Rolls

Just to put your mind at rest I'll take those shitty old h beams off your hands baron. :whistling:

mate, you are always there for the little guy when needed. I'm going to ring up all the people I've bad mouthed you too and tell them i've changed my mind. :) tomei h-beams in the post.

in all seriousness the debate between H vs I beam rods can and will go on for ever. what makes it tough to rule one design better than the other is different manufacturers use different materials. so if comparing a cast I beam to a forged H beam which do you think is stronger? on top of that there are variations in every manufacturers interpretation of an I beam design and an H beam design so even among the same 'type' the designs vary quite a bit. a little more meat here and a bit less there and suddenly the strength of the rod is greatly affected.

there are a few important things with rods.

material. what grade of alloy is used?

forging (there is a vast difference between the quality of forgings between manufactueres - I won't even mention cast rods as I don't know of any aftermarket company making any for RB engines)

design (I don't mean H beam or I beam, I mean the design of the rod, where is the weight concentrated? where is the rod weak? where is it srong? is there strength in all the right places?)

Track record - who has used these rods before? what kind of power are they handling? how are they performing in competition? how many sets have they sold?

quality control - are they all the same weight? what kind of tolerance are they allowing for the size of big end and little ends? how good is the finishing?

after all those considerations then maybe you can think about I beam vs H beam or throw in X beam too if you're feeling frisky.

anyway, some info on tomei H beams. there is a small section on why they make H beams over I beams but the fact is regardless of the type they are great rods and proven many times over to handle very high cylinder pressures in engines up to 1200hp in a 6 cylinder.

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/inf/pdf/121_AE-11x17.pdf

What we need to do is to put them into ANSYS for a nice FEA bashing so people can stop crying the tears of a small mexican child over which section is better.

Yeah I am sure an accurate result will be had :blink:

Two engines exactly the same one with "H" one with "I"... keep making power until bang then assess the damage.

Destructive testing definitely has it's place, but when you model something in FEA you have the opportunity to really control the variables involved in the whole simulation process.

For example, you could develop a 5 point test and test 5 different parameters of each rod and how the two samples respond to stresses etc etc, but your are able to do this in a fully controlled computer environment.

Now sure, simulation has it's flaws but it is massively widespread in engineering these days and is always going to be better then "My H beam rod can take 1337 more kebabs of power then your I beams bro, because they have extra tabouli"

One has to remember of course that FEA is only an approximation. However, its an approximation down to such a fine degree that' its "good enough" for practically any application. (of course real world testing is needed to make sure you've done your calculations right). The hardest part about FEA isn't putting in the object (dead easy), or loading it up with the correct conditions, its understanding the results, when to use them and when not to. (eg the 10th natural frequency of an object calculated by the FEA is most likely to be ridiciliously wrong).

In regard to rods themselves, my unexperienced but logical guess would be to buy pistons to suit your application. Sure xx H beams might be able to handle twice the power of yy I beams, but if you only want the sort of power that yy can handle.... get yy.

Edited by sneakey pete

mate, you are always there for the little guy when needed. I'm going to ring up all the people I've bad mouthed you too and tell them i've changed my mind. :) tomei h-beams in the post.

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/inf/pdf/121_AE-11x17.pdf

Just takin one for the team mate.

  • Nope 1

make no mistake I was not advocating H over I beam. my point is that in the real world were we have plenty of I beam and H beam designs that will take up to 200hp per cylinder just chose whatever you want. my whole point was the bloke writing off H beams as rubbish was wrong. there are as many good H beams out there as I beams. Some of the BEST rods out there are H beams (like the tomei ones above). coincidentally the tomei rods are pretty cheap out the US these days with the strength of the AUD. $1200 USD for a set of tomei rods tells me I will be using them next time (that's if the current ones ever need replacing....). they have some nice design features like the shoulders, no nuts (thread cut into rod instead), little cuffs to ensure god fitment of the two halves and the fact that they are forged as two seperate pieces instead of 1 piece that is then cut in half.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...