Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys....

Happy Festive seasons !!

im having to drive around some niggling problems at the moment...RPM is capped at 7,000rpm as there is a apparent ignition breakdown that needs to be addressed above this point and its also half throttle out of horseshoe, last turn and gears 5 and 6 to prevent breakdown.

Looking at upgrading to some LS1 coils :)

i have noticed that keeping it in the lower gear means the car enters the corner alot more eagerly vs the higher gear which settles the car and gives me a chance to process whats happening :P

i will definately pencil down these pointers but figured i need to put together 11 turns and a clean lap before i start to push

harder at certain points :cheers:

GOAL is for car to break 1:02s by August 2012 - all input greatly appreciated!!!!

Plan is to increase revs to 8000rpm, increase stroke :) ,increase boost (currently low boost), reduce some more weight and sort out the suspension further!!

I have to ask.. the fitting that goes in your oil filler hole.. what is the point of that?

It cant be a catch can return cause oil doesnt flow up, and even if it was why would u return trapped oil in the head back to the head. dont mean anything rude or offensive it just has been baffling the crap outta me for weeks

I have to ask.. the fitting that goes in your oil filler hole.. what is the point of that?

It cant be a catch can return cause oil doesnt flow up, and even if it was why would u return trapped oil in the head back to the head. dont mean anything rude or offensive it just has been baffling the crap outta me for weeks

:P

It was something i saw on a fellow members car (Stuart's R33GTR) and his rationale made sense.

Apparently all his breathing issues resolved itself when the oil cap was tapped and turned into another 'breather' point.

Idea is under G-forces, oil is pushed to back of motor. Having a hole at the front, helps the breathing for the motor and

prevents oil getting pushed out from the back

hope this makes sense :thumbsup:

Edited by HKS26T
  • 2 months later...

Hey lads,

the stupidity has begun!! Tomei 2.8L stroker goodness is on its way :P

86mm Block Hardened up with groutfill

2012-03-01201139.jpg

Torque plated for honing

2012-03-01202225.jpg

Honing process to suit chrome molly Tomei piston rings

2012-03-01223456.jpg

Head is getting a full pamper treatment as is the RB oil surge/blow bye issues :P

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...