Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Radius should be 0.25-0.26m roughly as the clutch plate itself is 240mm in a standard skyline. I'm surprised you overlooked this as you clearly went to a lot of trouble with your cut and paste

Actually I pulled most of the numbers out of my arse. 200mm was an estimate because I could not remember the actually number.

The points I made still stand.

Also it isnt a cut and paste.

Edited by djr81

Then we're in agreement? If you need to replace it, go for it. They're probably cheaper than factory flywheels anyway. If you're just changing the clutch though...machine the friggen thing for $40 and spend the dollars elsewhere. Unless you're slamming between the gears, trying to save every last kilo of racecar weight, or want to sit there jerking off over your ability to lift RPM faster in neutral than everyone else...there's no point.

Actually I pulled most of the numbers out of my arse. 200mm was an estimate because I could not remember the actually number.

The points I made still stand.

Also it isnt a cut and paste.

Oh sorry, I didn't realise you took the time to go to the windows character program to type the little half (1/2) symbols. My bad

Then we're in agreement? If you need to replace it, go for it. They're probably cheaper than factory flywheels anyway. If you're just changing the clutch though...machine the friggen thing for $40 and spend the dollars elsewhere. Unless you're slamming between the gears, trying to save every last kilo of racecar weight, or want to sit there jerking off over your ability to lift RPM faster in neutral than everyone else...there's no point.

Also if you are making more than 400hp at the wheels and using a button clutch it is a good idea to have one due to the explosive nature of cast iron when extreme sudden torque is applied

Then we're in agreement? If you need to replace it, go for it. They're probably cheaper than factory flywheels anyway. If you're just changing the clutch though...machine the friggen thing for $40 and spend the dollars elsewhere. Unless you're slamming between the gears, trying to save every last kilo of racecar weight, or want to sit there jerking off over your ability to lift RPM faster in neutral than everyone else...there's no point.

Yeah probably. For a track car - do it. For a road car it is probably neither here nor there.

But then we are all guilty of spending money on our cars for little gain or just for the satisfaction of doing it properly.

Also if you are making more than 400hp at the wheels and using a button clutch it is a good idea to have one due to the explosive nature of cast iron when extreme sudden torque is applied

For 7000rpm GTR launches maybe :P

Some of the cheaper lightweight flywheels have been known to do similar things too though. Either way, I'll be sticking with my standard flywheel until I'm on a weight saving mission.

Well, this topic was becoming so cliched with the age old argument about lightened flywheels (complete with some mathematical equations thrown in) I thought I'd add another internet forum favourite pointless argument - torque vs power.

Now let's hear it from the experts.

Well, this topic was becoming so cliched with the age old argument about lightened flywheels (complete with some mathematical equations thrown in) I thought I'd add another internet forum favourite pointless argument - torque vs power.

Now let's hear it from the experts.

maximum negative camber is where its at. :action-smiley-069:

  • Nope 1

I think it's a good topic...we've had a couple of different perspectives, all the information is there for readers to make up their own mind...and it got done in less than 3 pages, 10 earlier than I expected. I could torque about power all day, but in another thread maybe...

Good topic, yes, but the meat of it could have been covered in half a page. The rest of it seems to be the usual defending of one's position in the argument. Yes, I have seen it drag on for many pages too.

I guess the same goes for a lot of internet "discussions". Too many experts with their own lopsided view, refusing to give to the other side.

  • 1 month later...

on my r32 i changed my stock flywheel with a nismo flywheel (6.87kg) at my last clutch change. to be honest i cant really tell the difference in the way it drives any given circumstances. its no different on hills. its no different in traffic, although still a bastard in heavy traffic because of the 5puk clutch, but no worse than it was before. i didnt even get a placebo effect in acceleration. definately not worth the money unless your going even lighter for hard track use.

to some people it might just be wank factor

Edited by jonboy

Good topic, yes, but the meat of it could have been covered in half a page. The rest of it seems to be the usual defending of one's position in the argument. Yes, I have seen it drag on for many pages too.

I guess the same goes for a lot of internet "discussions". Too many experts with their own lopsided view, refusing to give to the other side.

Yeah, that's because someone will put up an opinion, and someone else has to quote them, knock them down, before providing their own opinion. That will start an argument almost every single time. Why? Possibly their both right in their own way, possibly they've seen both setups work, possibly each of them owns the opposing setup, and think it's the ONLY way.

I've seen exploding stock flywheels, I've seen exploding lightened flywheels. I've also seen MOST stock flywheels handle any abuse, and I've also seen MOST lightened flywheels handle any abuse. So who's right here? It's about mass opinion, and mass experience. The OP didn't ask for one person's opinion, hell he probably already knows that both setups have pro's and cons. So help the guy instead of pissing on.

However, if people weren't so critical of others all the time, we wouldn't see such defensive action. It should be as simple as posting opinions, one after another, the thread would b clean with only opinion, and you could weight the results from there.

Now I'm no clutch/flywheel expert, but one thing I'm good at is picking up personas over the internet quickly. (Being solidly online, everyday, for over 15-16 years will do that to a guy) :)

Everyone just needs to relax. State your opinion as requested by the OP, and have it at that. Kdone, kgood, klul.

I could paste this shit in every 3rd thread, anywhere at all, on the internet. Trying to imagine how self centered the next set of kids we'll see online over the next 10 years will be...

Yeah, that's because someone will put up an opinion, and someone else has to quote them, knock them down, before providing their own opinion. That will start an argument almost every single time. Why? Possibly their both right in their own way, possibly they've seen both setups work, possibly each of them owns the opposing setup, and think it's the ONLY way.

I've seen exploding stock flywheels, I've seen exploding lightened flywheels. I've also seen MOST stock flywheels handle any abuse, and I've also seen MOST lightened flywheels handle any abuse. So who's right here? It's about mass opinion, and mass experience. The OP didn't ask for one person's opinion, hell he probably already knows that both setups have pro's and cons. So help the guy instead of pissing on.

However, if people weren't so critical of others all the time, we wouldn't see such defensive action. It should be as simple as posting opinions, one after another, the thread would b clean with only opinion, and you could weight the results from there.

Now I'm no clutch/flywheel expert, but one thing I'm good at is picking up personas over the internet quickly. (Being solidly online, everyday, for over 15-16 years will do that to a guy) :)

Everyone just needs to relax. State your opinion as requested by the OP, and have it at that. Kdone, kgood, klul.

I could paste this shit in every 3rd thread, anywhere at all, on the internet. Trying to imagine how self centered the next set of kids we'll see online over the next 10 years will be...

Keep it to yourself mate :P

A lightened flywheel is excellent for track but for street driving i wouldn't even bother. as others have said its a pain in the arse. initial start-up and low revs your car will start to jerk back and forth.

Will it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's a fair chance that my bushes are Nismo, because I'm reasonably sure that when asked the question (when putting the subframe into the car in ~2012) "What bushes do you want to run?", I'm pretty sure I would have answered "The stiff ones!". I had to put some silicone grease onto the GKTech inserts I jammed into them last week, because the bushes were quite resistant to having something jammed up their jacksies. So, I reckon you'll be best off doing Nismo + inserts. And, if I'd known you had PU bushes in the subframe AND PU pineapples, I perhaps would have said earlier that that's probably not a good idea. The pineapples are only intended to work with the stock type bushes, because those have a crush tube (which is what makes it end up looking like there is sloppy space in there - but doesn't, because the crush tube does make contact steel to steel) and the pineapples live in the space between the subframe's outer tube and the lower washer/bracket. But the PU bushes don't leave the space in the same way that the stock format ones do, and they do end up fighting for space. Order some bushes and collars and get to it.
    • Thats the current state of the reo. Bit ew, but GTR Reo and supporting bars are $2000, and 2nd hand GTT ones are $1000... More engine disassembly. The good news is   Various LS weird sounds are apparently normal Everything coming out is in perfect condition The bad news is: Everything coming out is in perfect condition It looks like whoever assembled this engine ~25,000km ago was telling the truth with what's in it and how they did it. Even things I was unsure of like the timing chain - But it's a brand new double row timing chain, spaced perfectly. They even cut up the stock windage tray to keep it instead of being lazy and to work with the baffle. Cam, Heads, springs, LS7 lifters, Pushrods - All look new and have obviously been working perfectly. In other news, we removed the pineapples that were loaded below the superpro subframe bushes. They look a fair bit munted and have deformed the poly bushes that are 'above' them. I'm telling myself that now that there's space 'under' the bush between the little cup that bolts in... that having a pineapple wedged there was bad and basically made the rear end solid. The pineapple and the superpro bush are ... equally deformed (i.e they have deformed one another from being smashed together). We'll see how it goes with bushes only. I am sure this cope will fail and the answer will be to drop the subframe and put nismo rubber bushes in there instead. $400 worth of gaskets and ARP head bolts to replace perfectly new looking gaskets that absolutely weren't leaking  and were installed perfectly with great care - because god damnit.    
    • Why bother? Keep them under 1bar and be happy, I had it for 10 years and never had an issue. once you go beyond that the budget blows out fast and then keeps on blowing out 
    • I'd still recommend rebuilding the turbos too. That will eat up a lot of the budget especially if you aren't willing to put in the labor to R&R the turbos yourself but it's a huge risk to ignore it at this point.
    • Can't help it, its an illness. 
×
×
  • Create New...