Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all! Its about time we had another megameet i think! The last Southern Skyline Enthusiasts/Skylines Downunder South Island 'megameet' was possibly the SSE Cruise to Lake Tekapo in 2005. And before that possibly the SDU Queenstown meet in 2004.

Details below, please SPREAD THE WORD! We want a huge attendance!

SATURDAY, 19TH MARCH 2011 (rain or shine, as always)

DUNEDIN/LOWER SOUTH MEET UP

TIME: 8:00am to 8:30am

LEAVE: 8:30am, or NO later than 8:45am, arrive at Caroline Bay at 11am.

LOCATION: TBC, but likely somewhere on the one way system or on Pine Hill?

DETAILS:

- Please come with enough petrol.

- There will only be one toilet/food stop and that will take place in Oamaru.

- I'll hopefully have a car at the front (me) and the back with walkie talkies (range dependant) so please try stick to 100km/h so that we don't get too spread out. Following SH1 all the way to Caroline Bay in Timaru, hopefully everyone knows where that is!

CHRISTCHURCH/UPPER SOUTH MEET UP

TIME: 8:30am to 9:00am

LEAVE: 9:00am sharp

LOCATION: Rolleston BP Connect service station (corner Main South Road & Tennyson Street, Rolleston)

DETAILS: TBC

Timaruians and others can opt to just meet us at the Bay. :)

TIMMAZ TO DO LIST (in no particular order after the first three)

- Park up at Caroline Bay at 11am or 11:30am at the latest?

- Meet and greet and mosey at each others cars etc, then first lineup pics of the day?

- Enjoy the lovely SUNNY day.

- 'Outdoor Roast' lunch?

- Cruise over to Levels Raceway for a wee bit to watch the motorbike track day. Can leave after a few mins or whenever suits.

- Maybe cruise over to Pleasant Point and have a go on the Flying Fox? :D

- Meal at a distinguished restaurant later in the day (KFC/Maccas?)

- Couple more lineup photo shoots at random places?

- Mini Golf at Caroline Bay?

- <insert other stuff here>

Original topic

Edited by SkylineObsession

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...