Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as title states whats the max power for the standard 26 block, is there a ruff figure or is it one of those, how long is a piece of string. It has a HKS stroker crank so harmonics at high rpm shouldn't be too bad, putting 710awhp at hubs so maybe 800ish at the fly. reason I ask is I'm looking at a freshn-up -rebuild and wondering if I need to factor an N1 into the equation..

while I'm at it, car has 1000cc injectors and 1000hp fuel system in the boot, but still running standard hard lines between, are they going to flow enough for that system and that power especially with continued WOT around the track, hense the rebuild, just trying to work out how we got piston damage --dentonation due to bad fuel or tune, or leaning out due to restricted flow? no problems on dyno with flow just wondering if real world and continued WOT might be different.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/354935-max-power-for-rb26-block/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Personally I feel that the standard 5/16" fuel line is too small for that power, I would be running either 2 3/8" feeds (if you have a twin entry rail) or a single 1/2" and a 5/8" return.

yeah it is twin entry HKS 11mm rail and HKS 1000 injectors

twin pumps feeding the surge tank and twin pumps out of the surge tank?

not sure, I bought this car off SLY33 who started the RB26 dyno thread, its a full "magnaflow" system with one 525pro out, can't see whats in the tank.. it was all done by Nisspeed, and he does quite a few big power motors, the system was built to handle 1000hp ??

what im getting at is that a lot of surge tank setups are built with ample fuel supply from the surge tank to the engine. but when you stick it on a track that has long stretches of sustained WOT (without a large enough lift pump) you can run out of fuel in the surge tank itself and lose fuel pressure

what im getting at is that a lot of surge tank setups are built with ample fuel supply from the surge tank to the engine. but when you stick it on a track that has long stretches of sustained WOT (without a large enough lift pump) you can run out of fuel in the surge tank itself and lose fuel pressure

ok got ya, so I'll check what lift pumps I have, do I need the lift pump/s to, equal or more flow than the pump from surge tank to engine?

also, what about the standard block question, anyone, or is it just not an issue and people have no issues putting decent power through the standard block??

Depends on a lot of things mate, how hard are you revving it, Have you increased bore in rebuild etc etc ?

It would definately be getting a bore this time due to some marking of the cylinder from damaged ring land, and rev limit set at 8500rpm but see's that regularly, might consider taking that a bit higher as crank is good for at least 9k

there is no problem using a standard block with that power. if there's nothing wrong with it that a bore won't cure then don't replace it. but question. what size was the bore taken to last time? if it has a stroker crank I'm assuming it had forged pistons. they were most like one size over (86.5) or even 2 sizes over (87mm). if so then boring to 87.5mm is not a good idea for a big power engine. ideally you want to stick with 86mm or 86.5mm.

N1 block is a good idea but I wouldn't rush to buy one if you are not having block problems so far. on the other hand if you need to buy a brand new block (due to this one having already been over-bored) then I'd go straight for the N1.

there is no problem using a standard block with that power. if there's nothing wrong with it that a bore won't cure then don't replace it. but question. what size was the bore taken to last time? if it has a stroker crank I'm assuming it had forged pistons. they were most like one size over (86.5) or even 2 sizes over (87mm). if so then boring to 87.5mm is not a good idea for a big power engine. ideally you want to stick with 86mm or 86.5mm.

N1 block is a good idea but I wouldn't rush to buy one if you are not having block problems so far. on the other hand if you need to buy a brand new block (due to this one having already been over-bored) then I'd go straight for the N1.

thanks Baron thats the kind of pearl I was after

another option. if you have a good block (bore wise) but worried about strength look at the Platinum racing PREC. they are made as a block brace mainly to suit RB30 blocks fitted with RB26 sumps but they also do an RB26 version which purely acts as a block brace. it strengthens the girdle but retains the standard mains. it also attaches to the girdle with it's own fasteners (not re-using the factory mains) so you basically end up with the strength 4 bolt mains. it also adds torsional rigidity to the block which will stop them cracking between 3 and 4 as they are a bit prone to do. cost from memory is around $1200 so it's a lot cheaper than buying an N1 block and possibly much stronger. hi-octane retail them, or otherwise contact envy imports who designed them.

another option. if you have a good block (bore wise) but worried about strength look at the Platinum racing PREC. they are made as a block brace mainly to suit RB30 blocks fitted with RB26 sumps but they also do an RB26 version which purely acts as a block brace. it strengthens the girdle but retains the standard mains. it also attaches to the girdle with it's own fasteners (not re-using the factory mains) so you basically end up with the strength 4 bolt mains. it also adds torsional rigidity to the block which will stop them cracking between 3 and 4 as they are a bit prone to do. cost from memory is around $1200 so it's a lot cheaper than buying an N1 block and possibly much stronger. hi-octane retail them, or otherwise contact envy imports who designed them.

another good option, if I go with the standard block, that would be good insurance

cheers

wow thats at least hlaf the cost of an entire N1 block ?? aren't there other improvements to be had with the N1 block--oil gallerys etc

and will this increase the height of the block, giving similar issues as the 30/26 with bonnet and crossmember clearances ??

yep works with factory girdle. so does the 30 block/26 sump version. it acts as the sump adapter and block strengthener in one thing. I have seen other guys go to billet mains and chuck out the stock girdle which is a backwards step in my eyes. I saw an engine recently pulled down (a 30/26) with custom mains and girdle with a brack kind of like the PREC but it had bad bearing wear from crank walk.

how this one works is the factory girdle gets a flat surface machined into it (any competent machinist can do it). the girdle is still proud of the block (obviously) and you are mounting the PREC to the block factory sump bolts, and then it also bolts to the factory girdle (but not interfering with the factory main bolts). the 26 sump then bolts to the PREC and from memory you have a few bolts that go through both sump and PREC for more strength. it's a nice piece of gear.

Does look like its designed to replace the factory main caps

nope, as above it works WITH factory main caps and girdle. just with a flat surface machined onto the bottom of the girdle for the PREC to mate with.

if you want to buy one direct contact herman @ envy imports (they are Platinum Racing products).

if anyone's really interested I have the instruction manual here somewhere I can email you. it explains how to fit one and thereby explains how it works. the extra width gives you a bit more sump oil too (need to consider spacing or lengthening oil pick-up a little if no sump baffles etc are fitted - many just go external pick-up anyway though).

wow thats at least hlaf the cost of an entire N1 block ?? aren't there other improvements to be had with the N1 block--oil gallerys etc

and will this increase the height of the block, giving similar issues as the 30/26 with bonnet and crossmember clearances ??

does not increase block height at all (engine mounts fit to block not sump so engine is still exactly mounted the same). but DOES lower sump a little (very small amount - 20mm or less from memory, basically just the thickness of the PREC).

yeah they are a great way to get some block strength for a big power 26 or 26/30 without having to pay for N1 block or the other option till now as grout fill the block (not practical for a road car or circuit car, really for drag only).

even better if you are going to a 26/30 as in that case you need to spend $800-$1000 on a sump adapter anyway. spending a little more on one of these and it does the sump adapter job as well as more strength.

does not increase block height at all (engine mounts fit to block not sump so engine is still exactly mounted the same). but DOES lower sump a little (very small amount - 20mm or less from memory, basically just the thickness of the PREC).

yeah they are a great way to get some block strength for a big power 26 or 26/30 without having to pay for N1 block or the other option till now as grout fill the block (not practical for a road car or circuit car, really for drag only).

even better if you are going to a 26/30 as in that case you need to spend $800-$1000 on a sump adapter anyway. spending a little more on one of these and it does the sump adapter job as well as more strength.

am I right that the same PREC can be used for strenghtening the 26 and or adapting the 30 block and 26 sump, as I may go 26/30 road down the track, or are they two completely different plates

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...