Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ID2000 because of the volume of fuel at high rpm will not atomize properly, by having it further away from the intake valve you allow the fuel/air mixture more time to mix properly and enter the chamber. Proven that is makes more power at higher rpm having the injectors further away.

We will have both blanks running under full load and both banks running full sequential.

Yes if it was me id just run the one injector ie ID2000's. Well i remember about 2 years ago when i said to John can we just run the one injector,one large one. John went into great detail and expained injector frequency can run one cycle out of phase im not sure what that means and he said this is why we run two bank to cover up the out of phase injector.

I guess whats in Johns head is a greater understand in full detail how this whole buid is going to work.

Spray pattern is extremly important Vs Fuel Pressure you can bump fuel pressure and have the injectors spray like a hose in full liquid form, this is a mistake made by many people. This can lead to detenation caused by bad air fuel mixing.

A big high flowing injector will not atomise the fuel very well, hence placing it further away from the intake port will increase atmosation as it travels to the inlet valve... try putting an injector at 90°to the port and see how you go!

Wouldnt poor atomisation be caused by using the incorrect spray pattern and fuel pressure?? Especially in a boosted application?? I understand that a larger injector would be harder to get perfect atomisiation. but if its the correct injector with the correct spray pattern for the application, setup at the correct pressure wouldnt the angle of the injector cause minimal issues with atomisation?? Could you expand on it a little?? Sorry for the off topic chatter bobby.

Wouldnt poor atomisation be caused by using the incorrect spray pattern and fuel pressure?? Especially in a boosted application?? I understand that a larger injector would be harder to get perfect atomisiation. but if its the correct injector with the correct spray pattern for the application, setup at the correct pressure wouldnt the angle of the injector cause minimal issues with atomisation?? Could you expand on it a little?? Sorry for the off topic chatter bobby.

Think about where they place injectors in F1... right outside the trumpet of the inlet parallel to the inlet port.

Think about where they place injectors in F1... right outside the trumpet of the inlet parallel to the inlet port.

Thats all well and good but it doesnt answer my question. I understand that where F1 cars have them is ideal placement. But in real cars u cant always have ideal placement. Ive seen some old collectable cars with efi conversions that had the injector hidden under the manifold. The injectors would have been mounted at a 90deg angle at the least. Obviously a high performance application will be different, But im trying to understand more of the science behind it.

I was at John's Workshop and I found some paper work related to the build. Its very interesting how much details John has gone into with his calculations. This was done back in 2008 and he has box loads of it.

I guess it would be a mission to post each page. Well I managed to get some pics of the paper work i know to some people it wont mean much however to some its priceless.

Enjoy

post-49633-0-37897500-1328618846_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-75514700-1328618899_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-08539100-1328619029_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-76211500-1328619116_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-97343400-1328619155_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-34119300-1328619207_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-70981600-1328619298_thumb.jpg

Makes my head hurt doing that kind of maths! Someone should teach John how to use MS Excel. Im sure he could then create the mother of all engine calc spreadsheets.

I noticed the mentioning of a water/meth injection system too. As your already running with 12 injectors, where will you be putting the injector nozzles? Just after the BOV's and before the plenum, or are you modifying the plenum further to support direct port injection as well?

Makes my head hurt doing that kind of maths! Someone should teach John how to use MS Excel. Im sure he could then create the mother of all engine calc spreadsheets.

I noticed the mentioning of a water/meth injection system too. As your already running with 12 injectors, where will you be putting the injector nozzles? Just after the BOV's and before the plenum, or are you modifying the plenum further to support direct port injection as well?

Hey Ian,

John can not go near a computer i have tried many times they just die everytime he touches them. Yes the calculations are done for everything on and in the motor.

The water methanol injection nozzel will be placed infront of the turbo. John has said this will help cool the charge and increase the pressure ratio of the turbo as you now are compressing air with liquid vapour ( density increase = higher turbo pressure ratio).

I will be using a snow performace setup that will be modified.

Cant wait to see the final results on this build Bobby..its awesome to see this level of detail , custom fabrication , not to mention the dollar amount.thumbsup.gif

I hope this can really achieve everything your hoping for..look forward to the next installments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • She's looking good Greg. Colour suits it perfectly 👍
    • I had a look at the FAB9 EFR kit, around $8500 AU before delivery, so add in shipping, installation, consumables and tuning, I believe the price difference would be negligible  And whilst I am paying top dollar at MX5 Mania, if I have any issues with the kit they are local for support,  and from my experience, will happily go out of their way to help, hell, I've purchased parts from them and asked "how do I install or remove parts" and they have fitted a few of them for free, this means more to me than saving a few thousand dollars And yes, 99% of the time I just plod around in the car, that may change once I start hearing turbo whooshy noises, but, as I have 3 family members is the constabulary, even when I'm up it, it is only up to the speed limit, or occasionally, but rarely, overtaking on the Hwy (I just plod in the left lane typically and enjoy the drive) Plus the kids would never let it go if I got booked speeding, Jackie is constantly getting critiqued by the kids about her driving, which I think is hilarious, and tell them that she is "bringing shame to our family", so heaven forbid if I ever got done speeding, after all my mouthing off about her driving, I would never live it down, and it would be another thing she would bring up any chance she got Like the time I got drunk about 15 years ago and fell out of a cab, which gets brought up at least a few times every year since it happened Good times
    • True, might get it looked at. Found out you can in fact flatten the 12v battery relatively easily too the other day (kids lefts the hazards on) so meaning to get that checked in the new year. What's odd is it'll blow cold from both vents if you have the ac down as low as poss (18), but anything else the passenger one blows warmish. Also has been summer since I got it obvs but noticed it didn't seem to want to blow hot last night when we had a cold snap. 
    • You ask for things. You specifically state you want responsiveness. A link was provided for a far superior, more responsive option. Find a MX5 workshop that will install it for you. Maybe MX5 Mania will throw on the Fab9 kit. It seems they want to charge almost 14K installed for their kit, so if they charge you $6K to install the FAB9 kit then you'll be ahead? Though really, the 2.5 with a 2860 running low boost will more or less feel as good as anything else. It's a lot of displacement and a small turbo. Think of a more modern RB26 with one stock turbo :p TBH, truth be told I've been driving my own car, and use about 50% throttle at most for 99.9% of the time. Mr Bogan is likely similar so this is all going to be semantics for the use case he actually has. (He'll be happy with anything relative to now) However, the EFR is hands down far superior in this use case. You really, really, really, really do notice it over the Garrett or equivalent.  
×
×
  • Create New...