Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

a mate of mine is thinking of getting a Toyota GT Starlet before eventually progressing to a skyline. He just got his license and wanna the starlet as a stepping stone. I think its a pretty good idea.

He's not planning on making it loud, noisy and copbait on the road but he did asked me as a favour to post this thread on his behalf cos he wanna heard your views/experiences on the starlet.

The one he's looking at now is a 1994 black GT Starlet with aftermarket rims and exhaust system but alas, its an auto but he had got plans to convert it to a manual.

Please post your views and comments, guys. Hopefully, this does not escalate to a competition of egos or petty online fistfight :)

cheers all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35562-your-views-on-gt-starlet/
Share on other sites

Everything sounds good until this point: "auto but he had got plans to convert it to a manual." - golden rule of thumb: if you want a manual - BUY ONE!! It's a hell of a lot easier to say 'I'll convert it later' than to actually do it/pay for it.

Other than that - great little cars.

My mate owns a very quick gt starlet (180 kw @ wheels) which is a helluva lot for a small 1.3 litre car with a dry weight of 830 kg. Id have to agree on buying a manual one now as it is more trouble than its worth converting.

One more thing, i suggest getting the earlier model with the straight headlights, those circle ones make me sick, but thats just MHO.

Ohh, and dont count on going very fast with alot of weight in or being carried by the car. These things arent really known for strong tourque levels with such a low displacement but they are alot of fun (Upside is low fuel consumption though).

doesn't have much go above 90km/hr ? that could be a bit of a problem couldn't it?

They look ok for that small car sort of thing I guess.. maybe a little overpriced IMHO, but with some rims and bodykit can look kind of nice. Seen some work done to them to push them into a massive 13sec bracket :rofl:

I had one a year or so ago. Built it up from a 65kw @ wheels up to a 140kw @ wheels rocket. Had a full whiteline kit, and could throw it into anything (until i got a pretty tight LSD). I could not speak any higher of a car. Did not have one problem with it. A good mate of mine bought it off me and he still hasnt had any problems.

In conclusion: Absolutely awesome. I wish i still had it.

in all honest, your first car should be shit. i drove a non turbo auto vl and it was terrible but i learnt most of driving in it so yeah. just go with something simple and easy, dont go extreme, do that for your 2nd car

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...