Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tried to post this earlier, had a few issues with my computer, I apologise if it is a double post.

Been scanning through the topics, and I can't really find a definative answer.

I have a 1998 Series 2 Nissan Stagea RS Four S(neo engined).

It has developed a strange boost issue, after using the turbo for a short period, it will go from making full boost to making only half boost.

If I stop the car and switch the ignition off, start it again and drive down the road, I will get full boost again for a short time, then the issue will return.

The car is standard apart from an apexi air filter.

Always run on 99 ron petrol.

When the car recieved a full service the mechanic noticed, the recirculating dump valve had been disconnected and blanked off. He reconnected it and plumbed it back in, however I didn't experience the boost loss immediately after this had been done.

Is it safe to run the car without the recirculating dump valve? I experienced no issues before the car was serviced, apart from coilpack failure, the car mis-fired and shuddered from 3800rpm to 5000rpm.

I have checked all the hoses and can't find any leaks.

I have been told it could be a temp sensor, near the top radiator hose.

The recirculating valve could be leaking.

The turbo actuator, could be sticking open.

Does anyone else have any suggestions, or let me know if you have experienced this problem.

Cheers everyone

I'm sure someone will be able to clarify this, but I used to have the same issue, it happened when I ran less then 98 octane fuel, engine would knock and computer would retard boost to factory 7 psi instead of the 11 that it normally ran, so if ur running increased boost on factory computer it could have something to do with this? Like I said I'm no expert just saying that was the case with mine, only use 98 octane and problem has not resurfaced

block vacuum lines to boost solenoid.

its for cold start boost and warm boost. it will also revert if boost is increased for whatever reason.

just bypass it by removing and blocking boost solenoid.

block vacuum lines to boost solenoid.

its for cold start boost and warm boost. it will also revert if boost is increased for whatever reason.

just bypass it by removing and blocking boost solenoid.

???what??

Test temp sensor by disconnecting the one that goes to the ecu - the three wire one not the two wire one (or the two wire not the one wire - don't have a car to look at just now).. The ecu will revert to stored maps. If it runs better that way get a new sensor. The sensors are relatively expensive and you don't want to replace it just to see.

???what??

Test temp sensor by disconnecting the one that goes to the ecu - the three wire one not the two wire one (or the two wire not the one wire - don't have a car to look at just now).. The ecu will revert to stored maps. If it runs better that way get a new sensor. The sensors are relatively expensive and you don't want to replace it just to see.

isnt there a line into a boost solenoid fron the wastegate vacum line. goes into a elctric module, and exits a vacuum line into the suction pipe(filter to turbo)

i saw a thread somewhere in the DIY section explaining how to bypass it to avoid that low boost setting, and runs all the time on hi boost.

i dont think i made sense.

You mean like this:

This is the 10 minute no cost boost to 0.5 bar rerouting of the vacuum hoses [thanks to SK]. Disconnect the two vacuum hoses from the solenoid. Then connect the boost feed (from the cross over pipe on the left of the picture) to the standard T piece. Connect one side of the T piece directly to the wastegate actuator (on the right of the picture). The remaining connection on the T piece goes back into the inlet via the BOV return pipe (on the standard fitting). Make sure to put the standard brass restrictor in that vacuum hose to bypass the desired amount back into the turbo inlet. The standard bypass hole of 1.25 mm bypasses enough air flow for 0.5 bar. (See photo)

PS: If you want more boost you can drill out the bypass, 1.5 mm = more boost (around 0.7 bar) 1.75mm = a bit more (around 1.0 bar).

there is no such thing as cold start / warm boost levels on the C34 stagea's, and for the RS4-S there is only one setting, 7psi (it does lift a little more after a fmic and exhaust is fitted). the auto's have the 2 stagea boost switching from 5 - 7psi. i'd say the solenoid is working perfectly fine considering your getting high boost, and that something is triggering it to turn off giving only safe low boost, my bet is with what Chris_Beli said, you are getting some knock causing the knock maps and low boost settings to kick in. turning the car off for a bit resets this.

Shaun, assuming your only running the stock boost control setup, first thing i'd be checking is the base timing with a timing light. it is possible that it has been set a little bit too high, therefore adding a few degrees to the stock timing maps and causing it to knock on load. is the apexi air filter you have a pod filter, if so do you have a heat shield around it? if not sucking in hot engine bay air wont be helping.

running the car with no recirculating BOV and stock ecu in most cases is a real pain in the ass because nissan uses a mass air flow meter to calculate load. with no BOV, when you back off your essentially stalling the airflow meter, no airflow across it means no fuel injected, which leads to constant engine stalling. thats just the main issue, there are others associated with it, do a search of SAU and you'll find tonnes of threads about it.

your car is trying to tell you something is wrong .

my car would do that some days if i launched it and wound out 3rd .

there is a big matrix in the manual for symptoms and possible faults .

solenoid off = 7 psi . solenoid on = 10/11 psi . it is on all the time unless something goes wrong .

unfortunately "boost solenoid remains off " come up very often in the chart so it doesnt narrow it down to much .

most likely too much boost . boost on my car became unstable with a fmic and cat back exhaust . could peak to .9 bar .

Thanks for all the suggestions, I am not running any sort of EBC, I added the airfilter after the problem had already started to happen. It is an apexi cone filter, fabricated my own heat shield, and left the airduct on the grill in place.

I will have the timing checked, however I have no idea what the standard timing should be.

Thanks for your help guys.

If anyone else has any ideas let me know.

running the car with no recirculating BOV and stock ecu in most cases is a real pain in the ass because nissan uses a mass air flow meter to calculate load. with no BOV, when you back off your essentially stalling the airflow meter, no airflow across it means no fuel injected, which leads to constant engine stalling. thats just the main issue, there are others associated with it, do a search of SAU and you'll find tonnes of threads about it.

Umm no...

Running no bov means you get reversion through the airflow meter.. air moving through piping gets to closed throttle body, bouncing back through piping and gets chopped up by the air still exiting the turbo, this is the TU-TU-TU sound that VL boys crave so badly.

What happens when this air passes back through the airflow meter is that it gets read again, the afm doesn't know which way the air is moving, just that there is air moving over it. So what happens is, the stock ecu sees more air and throws in more fuel. It is this over fuelling that causes the engine to stall.

Just to add, having the dump valve open to the atmosphere instead of plumbed in will cause your car to use excessive fuel as the ecu is programed to use the air that gets recycled and pumps fuel in. Unless you mean it was blocked off at the intake pipe side so the valve didn't work, then that will cause back spool and early failure of turbo.( topic for discussion, not everyone will agree to this as there was a few cars factory with out them.)

Umm no...

Running no bov means you get reversion through the airflow meter.. air moving through piping gets to closed throttle body, bouncing back through piping and gets chopped up by the air still exiting the turbo, this is the TU-TU-TU sound that VL boys crave so badly.

What happens when this air passes back through the airflow meter is that it gets read again, the afm doesn't know which way the air is moving, just that there is air moving over it. So what happens is, the stock ecu sees more air and throws in more fuel. It is this over fuelling that causes the engine to stall.

i understand what turbo reversion is, i ran may car for 6 months or so with it after my turbo upgrade. however i experienced the complete opposite to running rich and stalling. i could have worded it better than saying it stalled the maf completely, my maf output voltage would become very unstable and lower than normal idle time output voltage (so to me thats as good as a stalled meter) and the wideband O2 readout would lean out causing an engine stall.

thats just my experience and hence why i wrote it. i personally haven't seen an engine run rich during reversion, running an atmo bov i have though. i guess afm placement would have an impact on it and could give a different result, my afm/intake setup is very similar to stock in shape and distance from turbo.

anyway in either case it will cause the same result and i regards to the OP's original question the answer is still yes, it is a bad idea to run without a recirculating BOV.

I had no bov for a couple of days (while piping was being fab'd) and it acted pretty well the same as when running the atmo bov (my tune was well on the rich side anyway and you could see big clouds of black smoke heh).

It's interesting that the maf voltage was all screwy, unfortunately I didn't have my carpc at the time so no idea what maf voltage was doing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...