Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pretty sure there was a thread about this maybe 6 or so months ago. think if i remember correctly most people agreed it was to do with incorrect torquing. cant remember other ideas suggested...

+1

Very sensitive to the way they are removed and installed. Slow and steady by undoing all the bolts a little at a time is the safe way, same when doing them up. It's due to the length of the cams and which lobes are compressing their respective valve springs part way along the cam.

If you put on and do up the caps unevenly or one at a time, fracturing/weakening and or breakage may occur.

Or if the cam has never been out than check thencam belt

Hasnt slipped causing the exhaust valves to contact pistons then snapping the cam.

Couldnt u hear the engine had no compression when cranking?

Cranked like a normal engine as the valves are all shut so it would have had compression even if we tested it. Belt is fine, tight as f**k and absolutely no way it has slipped.

Doesn't look like an oil supply issue either as there was plenty of oil and the two bearings I checked (next to the snap) look brand new.

Edited by Rolls

Yer my mate snapped one. As said above it was due to incorrect instsllation procedure. He tried to start tightening from the center but because the valves were holding the two ends of the shaft up it must have started to bend and then it snapped when he applied pressure on the next bolts.

Silly mistake really but it was his first major engine work. Was years ago now.

If you have not had the camshafts out could maybe suggest that timing belt was over tention or it slipped a tooth. Surely u would of heard valve to piston noise if any contact occured tho.

Cant over tensioning the timing belt load up the front of the shaft. the extra tension is trying to pull the front of the camshaft downwards. And even the smallest amount of deviation to the cam rotation will cause u a problem

Could a seized lifter also cause the cam to snap? Been speaking to a few people and a mate whos rebuilt 30+ motors reckons he has seen it all the time where if someone rebuilds a head and puts the lifters back in out of order etc it can happen.

I have a spare cam so might take all the lifters out, see what the deal is, then compression test it with the other cam, who knows might be lucky and all the valves are sealing, only take 10 minutes to try vs taking the head off, nothing to lose by trying it.

Be easier to take the whole engine out than to take the head off.

Yer posibly it could seize. Is ur engine an rb20? They is hydrolic lifter so would be rare for anything to cease up I would of thought but ur mate might well be right. But yer if you strip a head down its important to make sure any parts that are being re used go back where they came from.

I have my timing belt and all associated gear off at the moment due to doing some maintenance. God I hate doing it so much. I've done it about 10 times since owning the car and it never gets easier, always end up having no feeling in my fingers for a week.

We will stick a boroscope in there as well, but it takes 15 minutes to change the cam and it takes what 5+ hours to remove the head then gotta do gaskets and all the old hoses that will no doubt snap. I have nothing to lose by putting another cam in and compression testing, takes no time at all, I don't want to pull the head off and find it is all ok in there, and if I pull the head off and its stuffed I need to get another motor anyway.

lysdexia over on the 31 forums said he snapped a cam in a 25 and got off with no bent valves or pistons some how, turned it over hundreds of times as well, cause if the cam snaps wont all the springs try and close all the valves and just put the cam in the position with them all as closed as possible?

cause if the cam snaps wont all the springs try and close all the valves and just put the cam in the position with them all as closed as possible?

it wont though because there is always at least one cylinder with open valves, so my money would be on some valve / piston contact in the cylinders that are at the rear of the motor (the side that had no drive to turn the camshaft)

Edited by Bl4cK32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC IAT is measured under the blower hat I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
    • I get into huffs with people when I suggest the MX5 looks so much better as a coupe than it does as convertible. Pretty sure I don't prefer the convertible version of anything. Good job on the hardtop! The next buyer will appreciate.
    • IMO wrap does have its uses, but like you said, quality wrap, and professional installation, would probably cost want a quality paint job does, but, the paint, if maintained, is basically for life, and much easier to touch up if required  In other news: it's pissing down here, with thunder, lightning and only some small hail "at this stage", luckily all "my" cars are undercover  I've also been contacted by a guy in Newcastle about the SS, he said he will come down next weekend for a look, we'll see how that transpires I guess 🫰
×
×
  • Create New...