Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im building an rb25 with rb26 crank, Eagle rods and some pistons that says 8.5:1 compression in rb26.

But does someone know how much the cr would be with rb25det head? What I understand is the chambers a little bit smaller in the rb25det head then in the rb26 head? I want about 9.0:1 CR So what type of gasket should I use to reach it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356478-what-cr-special-rb2526-hybrid/
Share on other sites

What cr are u after? It all depends on wht fuel u are using and what the engine is being built for? Street circuit drag etx

I want 9.0:1 and will drive on e85. Will use the car as an allround some street,some drag and som track/drift. Nothing serious just for fun.

Yes from memory rb25 has smaller chambers in head. I think thats why they are 9:1 factorry and 26 are 8.5:1.

Most engine builder have a program that does a calculation to work out comp ratio.

they input...

head chamber size after any resurfacing has happened.

piston top size (in cc. Flat top is usually at 0cc. My dome tops were 13 cc I think.)

Head gasket thickness

and posibly gudgen pin height, rod length and stroke length.

They then select the block its for and the program does the calculation.

You can also use bore size inthere to get an overall displacement to I think.

Ask ur builder the question. As far as I know they regularly need to do these calcs

Everything I've seen suggests that standard RB25 and RB26 heads have the same config and volume in their chambers .

Usually manufacturers take the easiest read cheapest changes to get what they want in production engines . By this I mean pistons are I'd reckon cheaper to change from suppliers than cylinder head castings so it makes sense to me anyway .

My own opinion ? If possible change the static CR with pistons . I think different thickness headgaskets is a half assed way of changing things when its not intended to pull the engine out and do it properly . Thats fair enough for those on a budget but if is out and apart I reckon do it the way a good engine builder would and that means the appropriate pistons and an OE thickness headgasket .

The fact that its an RB25 head and generally a single throttle inlet system means IMO that 8.5 is too low . If it was running a 26 head/inlet manifold/cams then 8.5 is probably Ok .

The big difference with multiple throttles is you have far less resistance to inlet flow and the dynamic or effective compression ratio tends to be closer to the measure compression ratio . Nissan raised the static CR on RB25's because they knew the dynamic CR would be lower off boost and they wanted a bit more part throttle torque and no doubt improved throttle response and fuel consumption . The variable inlet cam would have had a say in this too .

Your call but I think 8.5 is too low in an RB25 and especially when using E85 , I would be thinking more along the lines of 9.5 and if you never use ULP again maybe a tad higher . I think what would happen with a low compression 25 headed engine is a low static compression ratio dragged to an even lower effective compression ratio by its inlet manifold system .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...