Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cut and pasted from another disco post:

700177-2 ... GT2835 52T with 84T turbine

700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine

700177-4 ... GT2835 56T with 90T turbine

So is the -3 the one to get for a stock RB25? What ID's does everyone else have?

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

Great to hear mate thanks for the first hand experience! So you run the reducer straight off the turbo then a 3" 45/90 deg bend to the afm?

Mine came with a reducer to the Intake pipe. I'm pretty sure its 4" on the turbo, definitely bigger than the intake pipe. I'll measure it on the weekend.

See thats the thing all the people on here that I have spoken to with the Pro S (joeyjoejoe, 75coupe and others) all have the 3" intake.

Are you sure the Pro S kits came with a 4" to 3" reducer at the turbo? As far as I know the Pro S kits have been discontinued and only the KAI is still made.

That would be great Fat_Tony, that would put the issue to rest.

Out of interest what results did you get from yours? Do you have a dyno sheet in the dyno thread?

No sheet. 345rwhp on 18psi. I think its a little low but my engine old and tired. Almost dead.

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

Great to hear! My dump has been modified as the angle at the front pipe is different and there are lots of extra welds. My tuner is going to modify it.

Don't trust my fallable memory because it could well be 100 and 80mm .

All GT2835 Pro S turbos (AFAIK) used the -3 cartridge meaning the cropped 84 trim GT30 turbine and the 56 trim 71.1mm GT compressor wheel . I think other HKS variants used smaller trim compressors or the 90 trim turbine but not the Pro S one .

A .

Hey disco it appears that although Harey and I have the same turbo we have slightly different dump pipes.

Do you know anything regarding the hks dumps, as in was there a revised edition with a slight design change?

No issue stepping up the intake as long as it has a reasonable length intake pipe.

I have installed one of the early proS kits on a mates rb25 with the supplied 3-4 inch adapter and 3inch intake pipe and there was no stalling issue there. Stock bov.

I ran my 3071 rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and no bov and it never stalled.

I ran my old hks t300s low mount kit rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and a very tight type r bov that didn't open unless there was 15psi+ behind it and it never stalled.

My old gcg highflow on a high mount manifold with very short intake pipe, 3-2.5 step down and no bov stalled like a mofo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm thinking that this is such a small part of the problem that you could easily forego the vac pump and just achieve 90% of what you need, which is keeping the gate open when off boost. It's not as if there are not already techniques to keep a gate fully closed under boost. After all, you have boost. Just use a wastegate actuator that will allow you to apply the boost on the appropriate side, just like every external gate out there.
    • Heres another fitment photo. redrilled the pattern to 5x112, and threw my audi´s rims on. had to touch the upper control arms with grinder, because the "sharp corner" was sticking about 2-3mm on the tire path. i have the "fender lip" mostly cut off, otherwise these (too) would contact with it. 20x9.5 ET25 rear    265/30 20x8.5 ET20 front    255/30 they are temporary, and look too big for the chassis. searching for 19s to it.
    • From experience, it will come back to bite you haha.
    • Background: my BMW 225i hatchback (rebodied MINI/X1) came with 3x RE003 and 1x Goodyear Asymmetric something. The RE003 roared and slid around, the Goodyear side was quiet and grippy. Definitely my car was thrashed before it got sent to dealers. My brother also got RE003 all round on his old VA WRX STI, I wasn't impressed with them, car was loud so can't comment on noise. Anyway, Hankook stopped making/updating V12 Evo2. So bought S1 Evo3 runflats. Great daily duties tyre and not that harsh ride. Tyre reviews site/youtube rated them as best stopping in the rain and I believe them. Next set, Goodyear Asymmetric 5 non-RFT. It beat PS4 in tests and is like $100 cheaper, so put them on. Great tyre, more grip then S1 Evo3 but a tad noisier as expected, still rocking them. Next set I am looking to go runflats, probably the new Hankook Evo. Although the new Pirelli PZ5 did well in tyrereviews test. Or go Goodyear Asymmetric 6 which was top tyre last year. The V12 Evo2 on my gen5 Liberty GT wagon did great in cold condition (drove to snowy mountains for a day so my husky can feel his ancestor's roots). Super impressive performance for $120 each lol. Never skimp on tyres, brakes, suspension. There's old pics of my R31's crappy random brake pads bending in the caliper at Oran Park track day somewhere around here. Anyway, my 2 cents.
×
×
  • Create New...