Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i am well aware that there are faster cars out there, i just want something that can go moderately fast and skylines do the trick for that amount of money i put in. also i like the look of the skyline so i'm happy, in addition, i have already bought the car so no use crying over spilt milk.

so it seems that it will do it in 8 seconds, thanks for you help guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5708048
Share on other sites

I'd like to see 8 seconds flat on a G tech timer with a standard N/A...won't happen...and if it does, you'll have to be bang on the mark with launch and gear change. It'll be closer to 9 on average. Still decent for a daily driver but don't expect to be beating Commodores and Falcons unless they are shit drivers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5708539
Share on other sites

all irrelevant. unless your going below 6.5 seconds it all feels the same anyways. the difference between 8 and 9 seconds is nothing on the road......only on paper, or if you cant count. just enjoy it, and get a turbo one when you can :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5711612
Share on other sites

I'd like to see 8 seconds flat on a G tech timer with a standard N/A...won't happen...and if it does, you'll have to be bang on the mark with launch and gear change. It'll be closer to 9 on average. Still decent for a daily driver but don't expect to be beating Commodores and Falcons unless they are shit drivers.

Duno about that, my n/a just had a catback exhaust and smashed fords and holdens with exhausts, dynoed at 123 rwkw

Depends if you get a clean example.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5712798
Share on other sites

id bring this back to the key issues people so often overlook- tyres n suspension

yeah with stock tyres n suspension id agree with those sad times for both de & DET.

throw some decent rims n tyres at em and even suspension (my 33 DE had this) n it is considerably quicker. Go to the drags, its all about getting that power down quickly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5712927
Share on other sites

my mates R33 does it in 6.8 (shitty timing skills but wouldn't be much over 7secs) his car is freaky tho :S he bought it off a guy who knew NOTHING about it.. however it had 2k worth of suspension upgrades and some wheels on there so never know the previous owner might have done something performance wise...

on the other hand my N/A r34 GT with an ecu and tune does it in 7.7 secs so far with a average launch but not the worst. so i'd say around 8-9 for a stock one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356793-0-100-kmh-time/#findComment-5720156
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...