Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can't drive a drag very well at all... and with my brother with a stop watch in the passenger seat I managed to do mid 9 sec 0-100. RB30 manual box, Rb25de 240,000kms. I barely got any wheel spin and I would rev it up a bit to start but the revs would drop down to like idle and then climb lol. I was too nice to it. But its sounds like considering I was a bad driver 9 1/2 sec is pretty good lol.

I am sure it did it faster when it was auto simply because it would start better (since the auto slips kinda). I guess mid 7 or 8+ as an auto. Sure did feel fast off the mark as an auto and that I think is where most time is lost unless I am mistaken.

cheers

Edited by senilykSkylines

Ok, thats it.

Actually bothered to do this.

10 secs, auto NA SR20, simply foot down in drive, in straight auto mode. Filled to the brim of fuel, full weight nothing taken out. 218k kms on the clock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzDd21y7nek

Edited by Ten Four

Hi guys, what would be the 0-100km/h time for a N/A nissan skyline manual coupe (untouched and unmodified)? I did a search around these forums, google etc couldn't find anything.

EDIT: Model is R34 25GT

Ok, thats it.

Actually bothered to do this.

10 secs, auto NA SR20, simply foot down in drive, in straight auto mode. Filled to the brim of fuel, full weight nothing taken out. 218k kms on the clock.

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=dzDd21y7nek

you didnt really answer his question...

he drives an R34 with a RB25DE in it . im also guessing you were not driving a skyline.

so

differnent car, different motor

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

you didnt really answer his question...

he drives an R34 with a RB25DE in it . im also guessing you were not driving a skyline.

so

differnent car, different motor

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

/facepalm

RB25DE Neo 200hp at fly yes? Manual = faster too with launch.

SR20DE non VVT AUTO 135hp @ fly..

Someone seriously can't drive. They SHOULD easily get high 7s (good driver) to mid low 8s (average performance car driver)

Edited by Ten Four

Cause there are people in here with R34s saying 10+secs for a R34 to 100.

If ^ car can do 10secs, then there are lots of shit drivers.

Quick youtube search. 8 secs, no launch.

Now close topic as question has been answered.

Edited by Ten Four

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

/facepalm

RB25DE Neo 200hp at fly yes? Manual = faster too with launch.

SR20DE non VVT AUTO 135hp @ fly..

Someone seriously can't drive. They SHOULD easily get high 7s (good driver) to mid low 8s (average performance car driver)

i originally said this becausethe SR20 (depending on the car - List of Cars With The SR20) you are capable of running low 8's

Edited by ML73ZR

Cause there are people in here with R34s saying 10+secs for a R34 to 100.

If ^ car can do 10secs, then there are lots of shit drivers.

Man the best I ever got from my auto turbo was ~7 seconds, I must be a really shit driver...

:(

<hangs face down in shame>

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...