Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently ordered some CP RB30\26 9.0 to 1 CR 86.5mm pistons and when they arrived I was surprised to find that they don't have any valve reliefs cut into them. Is that correct ? Bit worried as I'll be using 10.8mm lift Kelford Cams with them.

The build sheet is :

http://img861.imageshack.us/i/cppistonsspecs.jpg/

Heres a picture of the pistons :

http://img853.imageshack.us/i/cppistonspics.jpg/

Edited by mambastu
  • 2 weeks later...

I maintained the 8.5:1 scr on my rb26/30 build and was running jun 10.5mm lift cams, and the pistons had fairly serious cutouts in them. Pics are in this thread:

If it were me I'd definitely be checking with plasticine - once it's all put together and timing set up how you want it of course you would be carefully turning it over to check no interference but you'd want to know what kind of margin there is for stretch etc, espc if you're playing around with the duration of lobles and/or timing with slider cams etc.

But then I'm a fairly risk averse person.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/275548-andrews-r32-gtr-bolt-on-build-thread-phase-i-of-my-mods/

Actually drifticon I saw your thread and was keen to seen a photo of it with the bonnet closed, just because I'm yet to see anyone else space the subframe and was curious to see how close to flush the bonnet closes,

Cheers Brett

Sorry for the hijack

It's not very flush at all - we had to turn up spacers out of alloy, which are 20mm thick. Looks a bit agricultural.

Reasonably confident that it's the "twin turbo" pipe that is causing the problem, rather than the timing belt cover. Im going to a single turbo eventually so assuming I can get a manifold that sits the turbo low enough, it should be possible to get custom piping that clears the bonnet and also allows strut brace to be fitted.

[/hijack]

Actually drifticon I saw your thread and was keen to seen a photo of it with the bonnet closed, just because I'm yet to see anyone else space the subframe and was curious to see how close to flush the bonnet closes,

Cheers Brett

Sorry for the hijack

  • 1 year later...

Just getting ready to build the engine (at last !) and trying to work out deck heights, compression ratio etc.

The build sheet for the pistons lists a dome height of 0.055", does anyone know what that equates to in CC ?

I'm aiming for a 1mm squish clearance so I assume, as I'm using a Tomei 1.2mm 88mm head gasket, they need to protrude from the block by .2mm. Will be CCing the head shortly as its been skimmed in the past.

Cheers

Stu

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I love my R32 interior but then I also love the generic 90's nissan vibe from R33s/S14s/Pulsars etc 100%
    • I have seen this happen in cases like the R33 GTR where they eliminated the ATTESA actuator rod retaining clip to save 5 cents. Parts diagram references it, the actual part doesn't. Also if you try and look up the specific retaining clip on an R33 GTR it resolves to nothing. But it exists on R32 GTRs as I discovered a week or two ago.
    • Where is the electrical conduit? 馃ぃ馃ぃ
    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
  • Create New...