Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It seems that fairly stock-type (head porting + cams + manifolds) 30DET builds can go this way too. Pretty streetable and a step forward from the short stroke bottom end, but not a particularly wide useable rpm range where it makes best torque.

The better builds of those using a 25DET head seem to go with decent fabricated exhaust manifolds and open out those exhaust port restrictions. Mine is a mild build with OEM cast manifold but holds peak torque from 3400-7000 with Tighe cams 8.9mm lift and 265 duration. Might not be best for everyone's needs but it suits mine.

Thats a pretty usable torque range. I had peak torque around 3400rpm and it held to about 5400rpm then started falling away. It wasn't a very usable torque range when its paired with 4.11 diff gears and an rb25 gear with fairly narrow gear spacing.

Thats a pretty usable torque range. I had peak torque around 3400rpm and it held to about 5400rpm then started falling away. It wasn't a very usable torque range when its paired with 4.11 diff gears and an rb25 gear with fairly narrow gear spacing.

That's why I went to 3.9:1 diff gears, the small turbo was only letting me rev to ~5500-5800rpm and with the stock gears (4.3) I was slower than an RB20 32GTSt because I was changing gears so often. Even with the 3.9:1 gears, there was so much torque you could roll on in 5th from 80kmh and still pull like a freight train.

Edited by bubba

260 9.15 for up to 850hp on a 26/30. Any longer duration we found just lost response(at the same lift)...and did nothing to max power. Having said that some will argue a longer duration cam will reduce lag(on a Rb26), but I feel that would be related to the associated lift and porting. I for one would love to try the Mines-wave Shore Pro II Cams 252/252 10.05mm. They are designed for a RB26. Tells you something about duration and lift relation to acheiving a responsive engine. I have had some Gibson cams dialed and the told a similar story, although being staggered by a reasonable amount.

After all we are after max average power, having a cam come into its zone from 5000-10000 is not going to be as quick as 3000-8000 on a rb30 that revs to 8000-8500rpm

Matt

Where did the 850hp engine produce it's torque and power Matt?

Does anyone know if there's a typical correlation of cam characteristics on long/er stroke motors in terms of lift and duration ie does a longer stroke generally mean more lift, or more duration? For good reasons in terms of the respective effect of lift and duration there may not be a typical correlation, just wondering.

Not sure what the LS boys do when they go from 5.7 to 6.3 using a stroke rather than bore increase, presumably with a lot of street-built strokers due to mechanical limitations the rpm doesn't increase hugely, suggesting duration stays relatively mild but the extra capacity has to be filled somehow during the longer period of the stroke.

Yeah did some calcs on 3.5 diffs, top speed at 8000 would be 366k/hr but pretty sure it wouldn't get there unless it was 700rwkw.

What did you get the 3.9s from, assuming Stagea is awd?

3.9s are in my 32gtst, came out of an auto S13.

AFAIK the only 4WD ratios are 3.5 (34gtr), 4.08 (Stagea), 4.11 (32/33gtr), 4.36 (32GTS4, not sure what the 33GTS4 and 34GT4 used).

I wonder what the 4WD Cimas used? One would think with a v8 and an auto they would be pretty tall gears..

Where did the 850hp engine produce it's torque and power Matt?

Does anyone know if there's a typical correlation of cam characteristics on long/er stroke motors in terms of lift and duration ie does a longer stroke generally mean more lift, or more duration? For good reasons in terms of the respective effect of lift and duration there may not be a typical correlation, just wondering.

Not sure what the LS boys do when they go from 5.7 to 6.3 using a stroke rather than bore increase, presumably with a lot of street-built strokers due to mechanical limitations the rpm doesn't increase hugely, suggesting duration stays relatively mild but the extra capacity has to be filled somehow during the longer period of the stroke.

It made 823hp

3000rpm 406nm

5000rpm 879nm

7500rpm 759nm

8300rpm 698nm 823hp @ 22psi

BP98 Fuel with 10% methanol

Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @soviet_merlin Thanks mate!  Nothing too major but will hold me up for a while. I've got lymphomas to get taken off the back of my neck and the middle of my spine which always conjures scary thoughts!  It sounds worse than it is. Yeah great, conjuring more rabbit hole deepening , just what I need! 🤣  
    • I'd argue the F50 kit I got is very good value. For ~2k I got the calipers (refurbed condition), adapters, pads, brake lines, rotors, and top hats. I think you'd be pretty hard to get Evo/GTR/350z brembos + the additional hardware for similar money. Used market for a pair of front calipers alone I've seen tend to run anywhere from $1500-2000 depending on condition.    That said, something like a GTR or 350z brembo is a lot easier to adapt to the Silvia. 
    • Is there a significant price difference between the Evo/gtr/350z brembos vs the F50? Looks amazing.
    • I was actually being a tightarse at the time LOL... My OCD is tickling me into running a 2nd 8AN Teflon hose all the way down and removing the 2x OEM hardlines. My other side of my brain is telling me to run 2x hardlines front to back (also acts as a fuel cooler, so win win).
    • As I mentioned in an earlier post, I had some trouble with the Silvia's brakes dragging back in 2023. I managed to sort it out then, but the same problem came back to bite me late last year. Just take a look at the picture – I had a feeling the handbrake was acting up again, and I was right. Anyway, I'd been wanting to upgrade to bigger brakes for a while. Not that the Silvia's brakes were bad, but it was more of a "want" than a "need", you know? It was funny, though – at the time, I couldn't find any Evo Brembos, 350Z Brembos, or GTR Brembos for a decent price (of course, tons of them popped up online after I already bought my kit!). I ended up going with an F50 Brembo kit, which came with adapters, brake lines, 330mm rotors, and top hats. The F50 Brembo caliper was used in a few other cars too, like the FPV. I also decided this was the perfect opportunity to ditch the Silvia's ridiculous rear brakes and that awful handbrake (some of you were definitely right about that!). I picked up some R33 calipers and all the necessary bits – rear drums, backing plates, and new hardware to refurbish the calipers. Of course, it wouldn't be a project without a few hiccups. Turns out the brake master cylinder was playing up and basically (to put it simply) keeping the brakes engaged. I had it overhauled, and after some adjustments, everything was working again. The whole process took a while, as you can imagine. To top it off, the front right wheel bearings were shot and needed replacing too. This is a rare occasion where I'm posting an update while it's all still fresh! These pictures were taken just this afternoon.
×
×
  • Create New...