Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guyz

When my lights are on, are all 4 rear lights ment to be on? because only the outher ones on both sides go on and when i push the brakes all 4 go on. Should all 4 lights be on when i turn on the headlamps?

thx

There's nothin wrong with your 'line, that's how the lights are :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35761-rear-lamps/#findComment-713795
Share on other sites

it actually depends on who compliances your car and who certifies the compliance. Most inspectors are cool with the whole rear light thing... and let it be all 4 dim when on and all 4 bright with brake.

There is an ADR though that contradicts this and as a result all locally sold R32 GTR's were modified so only the outside lights were dim when on and all 4 bright on brake. Some compliance engineers enforce this rule on imported skylines too, and as a result of it some of us have wierd looking lights.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35761-rear-lamps/#findComment-713858
Share on other sites

mine is: 2 outside ones on for parkers and all on 4 for brakes - it has always looked ODD to me so...I think I will um fix it!

Not something I think about much due to the fact I cant see the back of my own car, come to think of it, I dont see the back of many cars :) lol j/k

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35761-rear-lamps/#findComment-720477
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...