Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so general consensus is they both work well, but to optimize the emanage u need something like a nismo ECU................ so either way it doesnt matter what you run.

oh and that Iain is a knob for selling his stagea :P

so general consensus is they both work well, but to optimize the emanage u need something like a nismo ECU................ so either way it doesnt matter what you run.

oh and that Iain is a knob for selling his stagea :P

The stock ecu is fine with the EMU, thats what I run but the speed cut is still there, unless you run the HKS SLD or an aftermarket ecu.

Not sure yet how the Fcon gets around the speed cut MIL and throttle restrictions, the HKS loom has 4 extra wires I cant diagnose which return to normally unused ecu pins. It will obviously be harder to tune though.

And Iain is definitely a knob, even if he kept his Stagea... :nyaanyaa:

The stock ecu is fine with the EMU, thats what I run but the speed cut is still there, unless you run the HKS SLD or an aftermarket ecu.

Not sure yet how the Fcon gets around the speed cut MIL and throttle restrictions, the HKS loom has 4 extra wires I cant diagnose which return to normally unused ecu pins. It will obviously be harder to tune though.

And Iain is definitely a knob, even if he kept his Stagea... :nyaanyaa:

+2 On the Iain comments....but we all know that!

And if I had the cash and I didn't already have the Nismo i'd be going with the..............................HKS over the E-manage...there I said it!....I did think about going the HKS and Nismo but it would be pointless and I was lacking in cash...I only need fuel control and the AFM clamped from where I am to make Scott cry!....

Edited by Jetwreck

I only need fuel control and the AFM clamped from where I am to make Scott cry!....

Better hurry mate, my 3.5:1 diffs are on their way... I should do before and after Calder runs. :cheers:

Where and from what are you guys getting the 3.5 diffs? What's the standard ratio we have? Do you notice any gain in economy as you would be sitting at higher revs and more vacuum compared to standard.

Cheers

Oh the diffs......the fronts come up every now and again....just do your research and you will find a good front 3.538. Then you just need to find a v35 or 350z mt diff.....the whole lot should set you back about 1k.

Ps the pm35 all come with 3.538's

Isn't less vacuum closer to 0 as you move into positive pressure and more vacuum a larger number such as 30 for example?

The one thing I hate with the stock ratio is the slightest throttle touch and its positive pressure even if you dont need. I also hate it when cruIsing at 60 and any speed above, it's very sluggish until the converter unlocks. I usually only want to squeeze the throttle a tad for a slight rise and it does nothing until it unlocks. Do the 3.5 gears help with this at all?

Edited by slippylotion

i absolutely hate the auto mode since when do u cruise at 55km/h in 5th gear FARK YA........... manual mode is way better and if ur doing 100 in 5th it doesnt drop down to 4th to speed up to 110

Yeah, around town I always lock the gearbox in 4th, saves kicking down all the time if you actually want forward progress.

Normally don't use auto unless I'm on the motorway.

Isn't less vacuum closer to 0 as you move into positive pressure and more vacuum a larger number such as 30 for example?

The one thing I hate with the stock ratio is the slightest throttle touch and its positive pressure even if you dont need. I also hate it when cruIsing at 60 and any speed above, it's very sluggish until the converter unlocks. I usually only want to squeeze the throttle a tad for a slight rise and it does nothing until it unlocks. Do the 3.5 gears help with this at all?

I'm at -5 to -10 on the freeway....I used to always be +5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...