Jump to content
SAU Community

Lambchop With A Renault Axis Here...


Recommended Posts

OK any of the guys running F-Con's might be able to help me out and of course Scotty...........

i might aswell quote whats been said its a it easier, but any ways Alex did a cipher log on my car and then i passed on the details to Jez and the question is as follows:

Alex: "there seems to be a problem with the ECUs AFR correction, because it is cycling to each end of the ability to % correct. To my knowledge this is usually caused by the fueling map not being accurate enough in the low range/stoich range. You can try disconnecting the O2 sensor, and see how it drives, but let Jez know, and I'm sure he'll be able to touch it up a bit. If it gets really bad, just disconnect the HKS and run the stock ecu."

Jez: "Have u spoken to Scott? He mentioned that the f con is designed for 350z and the 02 sensors cant be used accurately or something along those lines. Have a chat to him but of course we can check it on the dyno or road with my wideband"

cheers Theo.

Have you got a Wideband Theo?

Might be worth connecting the output of it to the F-con for feedback.

Not sure about what Jez said about the O2 sensor, never heard that myself, but I'm connecting the wideband to the F-con to cover that base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just disconnect the feedback for now, although you will need to switch it off in the software. I have never had my o2 feedback working, there is no narrowband sensor in my exhaust. I was planning to do as Ryan said, hook the wideband in to the fcon. Do we have information on which input to use ect? It's been a while since I looked at the wiring diagram...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I was able to scrounge in my files...

Wideband A/F 5V - GCC Ignition Signal Input 16

Wideband A/F GND - GCC Ignition Analog GND

Fuel 2: Wideband Input

AFR 1 Feedback Map: Fuel Trim Map

AFR 2 Feedback Map: OFF

AFR Feedback Start Time: 60

AFR Feedback Cycle Time: 100 msec

AFR Feedback Volume: 1.00

AFR Feedback ECT (low): 80 C

AFR Feedback ECT (high): 100 C

NOTE: To enable Target AFR tuning, AFR mask table needs "1" setting in enable zone.

NOTE: Once Target AFR tuning is done, set AFR 1 Feedback Map to "OFF"

Not sure if that's useful, mine is setup a little different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$444.00 for a Autometer 3378

Sport-Comp Air/Fuel Ratio Pro Gauge

2-1/16", Digital, Wideband, Range: AFR or LAMBDA

does that price sound about right and is it a good unit?

would like to stick to this one as it will match the rest of my gauges but if its not suitable or a rip off i might reconsider.

edit:

  • Includes 8 ft. tubing or wiring harness.
  • LED digital display.
  • 0-4v data output feed for ECU, data acquisition unit, or Laptop tuning
  • Auto-Dimming gauge brightness feature
  • Includes custom tuned .1 AFR Resolution Bosch LSU4.2 Sensor
  • Display data in Lambda or numerical A/F ratio
  • User programmable range
  • Peak recall/memory
  • 10:1 to 20:1 AFR Range for Gasoline Applications
  • Adjustable for Alternate Fuel Types (Ethanol, Methanol, Propane, CNG)
  • 6:1 to 18:1 AFR Range for Alternate Fuel Types
  • User Programmable Warning Function
  • This product has no provision for dial illumination/back lighting

Edited by WAGON_BOY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hhmmm seems as though my stock computer has overridden and tuned itself to a bad state (its been in about 2000km)

noticed pinging today, and once again the cell light came on, but this time when cruising down the highway.

the exhaust smells like unburnt fuel and the engine oil reaks of petrol, so im not happy but we'll get it sorted.

so i think its time to sort out the O2 sensor or f*ck it off and like you guys have said get a wideband and connect it to the f-con.

any other idea's welcome.

Edited by WAGON_BOY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it only ping'ed cos i was being a knob held it in 4th going up a steep hill at 90km/h i shouldn't have pushed it and/or dropped it down a gear and it probably would've been alright i guess.

but it makes me wonder if it's done it more often and i haven't noticed cos i've had the radio on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not worth the risk I don't think, so cheap insurance. You can log it all too.

I don't think Scott had issues with the stock ECU retuning itself though?

I'll be able to tell you more in a few weeks when I get it in. Although mine will be different, as I've got the extra sensors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the sensor plug, you would need to turn off o2 feedback in the fcon though or the code will show.

If it is pinking you will need to get timing backed out in that cell. Doesn't sound like a safe tune unfortunately. Take it back and get it sorted asap. Bad pinking is similar to hitting the edge of the piston with a mallot, the engine won't take it for long at that power level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the ping was due to it being too lean. Was like cycling before, adding and taking fuel. If it was taking fuel out up the hill, then it would increase the risk of ping. Unplug O2, reset ecu, and see what it does. Shouldn't ping in high load/rpm because it shouldn't be using the O2 correction.

I think the tune is safe, but it's the ecu having trouble with the O2 sensor. The tune really has no bearing on that. If it doesn't work, then just as Scotty said, move the fuel target to 15:1 and that'll stop the ecu using the O2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is there any way to stop the fault code 0135 popping up cos the O2 sensor is unplugged ?

Get a wideband with a programmable narrowband output.

You can then wire the narrowband output into where the O2 sensor was, and the wideband output into the fcon.

This ^^ is excellent advice!

If you replace your narrowband O2 sensor with a wideband one to do what Ryan suggested above, the CEL will continue to pop up, not because you don't have a narrowband signal going to the ECU (you will have from your wideband), but because the ECU can't see the O2 sensor' heating circuit.

The fix is either a) install your wideband sensor further down the pipe, just before the cat (like recommended by many suppliers) & leave your factory narrowband sensor still plugged in. The signal circuit will be disconnected from the ECU so won't do diddly to your tune.

Or b) replace your factory O2 with the wideband one and put a very large (10W) resistor across the heating circuit (near that green plug that you pictured) & that will fool the ECU into thinking the sensor is still there. I'll have to check what resistance it should be, but somewhere around 10 ohms is what I'm thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Define "Nissan big brakes". You just mean standard R34 4 pots? And...it's not even the offset you need to worry about. It's really a detail of how much clearance there is between the caliper and the back of the spoke/face, which is affected more by the design of the spoke than it is by the offset. If you think about it....take any wheel, say a 19x8 that does fit and clears the caliper. Then add or subtract an inch of wheel on the outside, without changing anything else. You have changed the offset by half an inch, but not changed the clearance situation at all. Same for if you add or subtract an inch from the inside edge. The way for you to work this out is to take a wheel off the car, grab a straight edge and a ruler or two, and start to measure the distances from the wheel mounting face on the hub to the outer face of the caliper, and the outer diameter (that faces the barrel of the wheel) of the caliper. Armed with these dimensions and any other measurement that grabs your fancy while you are there, you can then go to the seller of the wheels and do the reverse measurements from the wheel's mounting face and see if there will be clearance to the caliper. There really should be. I have 17x8 RPF1s +35 clearing the caliper face by a finger tip. Those wheels do have pretty thin spokes with some curvature.... but then so do most wheels to suit Jap cars.
    • So I’ve got a r34 sedan that I managed to get green stickered, meaning I need to go through government approved wof station for my car to be allowed back on the road for some reason my car is certed for 19x8 rims.. I need these wheels  does anyone know what offset will be fine to clear Nissan big brakes? I saw 35et for sale near me, I can’t drive the car to test fit or risk being fined ..   I searched heaps online couldn’t find anywhere..
    • Okay, with all that being said about sloppy blowing from twins, I happily acknowledge the superiority of a single turbo setup on the RB; however, I still plan on double trouble.  I know the -9s were quite popular for some time because they seemed to meet that sweet spot between the -7s and 5s, would introducing VCAM and/or stroking to 2.8L provide the additional displacement/flow to push twins closer to the 500-600 goal?  Does it make more sense for a daily to just do an engine overhaul, slap some -7s on it and enjoy a bit more reliable power?  Has anyone driven a mine's overhauled and tuned engine?  I know they certainly don't approach the power numbers that you drag monsters do down under, but for daily street usage, I just want it to be fun and healthy.
    • Mmmm. Perhaps more correctly stated that the one turbo doesn't actually force air back down the throat of the other. All it does, and all it has to do, is be pumping a little harder than the other turbo (which is an effect of how the turbos are getting driven by the exhaust and inherent resistance to output air flow that each turbo sees up to the merge). If the turbo that is not flowing quite as much then nudges the stall line (because it gets pushed there by the higher flowing one stealing the limelight and moving its own operating point further from the stall line), then you get the behaviour described by Josh. There is no need for air to move backwards in any way. It just needs to be less air moving forwards than is required to stay to the right of the surge line.
    • GTX2860R Gen 2 is an option. No, it doesn't actually do much. The basic problem with wanting 600 whp out of the factory twin turbo setup is a few things. One is that the twin turbo piping is just so, so inefficient. The front and rear turbos are not actually working evenly. The rear turbo is always moving more air than the front. On top of this the OEM rear compressor inlet is rubber that likes to collapse causing a huge intake restriction. The merge doesn't even wait until the intercooler to happen, and it happens at a 90 degree angle. This is why you see some discussion about "turbo shuffle", where in certain conditions one turbo can actually force air to go backwards into the other compressor and stall it out, then once the other turbo recovers it stalls out the first turbo in a cycle until you do something to break out of it. The other issue is that the RB26 is just not that efficient an engine. It needs a surprising amount of ignition timing to reach MBT for a given cylinder pressure so all that time in which the cylinder is pressurizing before TDC is just wasted energy. An N54 might be around 10 degrees BTDC on a stock turbo getting into the boost. An RB26 is closer to 25 BTDC. Net effect is a turbo roughly the size of what HKS uses on the GTIII-SS (smaller than the R3/GCG Japan "GT2860-1" -7s) is only good for maybe 550 crank hp or low 400 whp while a roughly comparable turbo on an N54 can deliver something like 700 crank hp and obviously drivetrain losses are greatly reduced when you aren't burning a bunch of power on keeping a hydraulic pump + transfer case preloaded all the time. So yes, you can make a lot of power but there's a reason why people go single turbo for the numbers you're asking about. Don't forget that the RB26 can't even do a straight line pull without oil starving on the stock oil pan either. Baffles can help, but really you just need more oil capacity.
×
×
  • Create New...