Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Garrett have sold out of GTX stock worldwide, there is certainly a lot of interest. There must be plenty of builds in the pipework.

It looks like you have your answer, GT3071 will be the obvious choice. :thumbsup:

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have/had the GT3076 0.82 IW, I found it a little bit laggy for my liking, but I still enjoyed it, I was pulling ~265rwkw at 15psi

You also have to remember, everyone's case/experience with these turbos is going to be different because of different set ups. So what may work well for someone else doesn't mean you are going to get the same results.

I would maybe suggest the GTX3071 or strongly suggest the GT3076. Maybe speak to Morrie at Horsepower in A Box, he has played around a little bit with the new GTX series - GTX3076 only I think, can't remember.

Sounds like you have 3 choices in 0.82 IW:

- 3071

- 3076 52 Trim (Disco's choice)

- 3076 56 Trim

The earlier on the list the more responsive and the less top end. The later the less responsive and the more top end. Although we are not talking huge differences between all of them, maybe 3-400rpm in response and say 20-30rwkw in top end.

Joeyjoejoeshabadoo (sp) seems to be the ideal Case for 3071 (admitantly 2835 .67 or something). Making 260ish at 1 bar. Full boost about 3300. Sounds perect in theory

it is ;)

dan (halle) has just changed from a 2835 to a 3037, so he should have his old kit for sale...

Sounds like you have 3 choices in 0.82 IW:

- 3071

- 3076 52 Trim (Disco's choice)

- 3076 56 Trim

The earlier on the list the more responsive and the less top end. The later the less responsive and the more top end. Although we are not talking huge differences between all of them, maybe 3-400rpm in response and say 20-30rwkw in top end.

FWIW I've tried both the 3071 and 3076 52 trim with twin scroll .78 rear housing on my SR20.

With a 3.5 inch dump/exhaust (up from 3 inch) I managed to get the 3076 52 trim making more mid range than the 3071. To make it clear, the 3076 52 trim was more livelier than the 3071 at any rpm.

The 3076 52 trim is a great "no compromise" turbo compared to the 3071 for 290+ rwks'. At this level of power, traction is an issue and is probably no use making more for a rwd street car. BUT if you want more.....just add E85!!

The only downside (if you call it a downside) is that the 3076 makes alot more spool noise than the 3071 due to the surge slots in the 3076 compressor housing.

Edited by juggernaut1

i wish you had done that back to back without changing the exhaust man :/

Don't think things would have improved, and possibly worsened/caused damage as the 3071 was already surging when coming onto boost wih the 3 inch exhaust.

A better flowing exhaust would have possibly made it surge more when coming onto boost. The surging tells me I couldn't put any more boost into it when coming onto boost so I doubt it could make any more power in the mid range.

The surge slotted 3076 52 trim allowed me to at least match the 3071 to build boost and make significantly more mid range in the process - probably because A - it was not surging and B - it was possibly a cooler/denser intake charge with the slightly larger compressor and C - with the larger dump there was a bigger pressure differential across the turbine when coming onto boost which pulled the 3076 onto boost earlier than expected.

I.e on the dyno the 3076 52 trim was making positive pressure by around 2300rpm, 1 bar at around 3350rpm and 1.5 bar (22 psi) by 3750 rpm on a sr20.

Edited by juggernaut1

I have/had the GT3076 0.82 IW, I found it a little bit laggy for my liking, but I still enjoyed it, I was pulling ~265rwkw at 15psi

I had a similar experience, Mine was a little laggy but made 300 odd RWKW at 18psi so it was pretty good. But in changing to a RB26 with twin HKS2510s I realised how much better 300 rwkw could feel!

I had a similar experience, Mine was a little laggy but made 300 odd RWKW at 18psi so it was pretty good. But in changing to a RB26 with twin HKS2510s I realised how much better 300 rwkw could feel!

Did you have the 56 Trim 3076?

Did you have the 56 Trim 3076?

What ever trim is the same as what HKS uses for the RB25 3037....so from my fuzzy memory I think that is the 56T. I have pics of the ID tag somewhere. If i remember i will go look it up!

cheers guys. all info is massively helpful. something like the 3037 was what i was after but the $$ isnt there for a genuine kit. im now leaning towards to 3076 with 52t, but any more helpful info is appreciated

Garrett have sold out of GTX stock worldwide, there is certainly a lot of interest. There must be plenty of builds in the pipework.

not quite, i rang MTQ and they have in stock, a touch over 2k though

The surge slotted 3076 52 trim allowed me to at least match the 3071 to build boost and make significantly more mid range in the process - probably because A - it was not surging and B - it was possibly a cooler/denser intake charge with the slightly larger compressor and C - with the larger dump there was a bigger pressure differential across the turbine when coming onto boost which pulled the 3076 onto boost earlier than expected.

I.e on the dyno the 3076 52 trim was making positive pressure by around 2300rpm, 1 bar at around 3350rpm and 1.5 bar (22 psi) by 3750 rpm on a sr20.

that sounds pretty much perfect, with a reasonable top end to boot.. this seems the best compramise between spool and top end.

while your on the dump pipe topic. ive read a split dump set up on the garret IW set ups arent ideal and a 'bellmouth' set up works better? the rest of my exhaust is a 4" magic cat and 4" cat back so that back pressure should be ok

thanks again

not quite, i rang MTQ and they have in stock, a touch over 2k though

Yeh, I would never buy from here for that reason. For much the same price I got the GTX 3071, Tial 0.82 stainless Vband housing and a 45mm turbosmart wastegate delivered, I just have to wait for stock... :dry:

So in the end much of a muchness and either should do the job? Been doing some research this arvo. Plenty of info on the 76 with 56 trim on RB not alot with the 52. so if it's comparable to the 3037 (even with the rear housing difference) then there's also alot

while your on the dump pipe topic. ive read a split dump set up on the garret IW set ups arent ideal and a 'bellmouth' set up works better? the rest of my exhaust is a 4" magic cat and 4" cat back so that back pressure should be ok

thanks again

I've had the CES split dump pipe on the stock s15 turbo. Never had it on a dyno but it was a fantastic upgrade from a seat of the pants feel.

However, depending on the quality of the split dump and how soon after the slit dump merges back into the main exhaust can give varying results (good and bad). My current setup has the external gates merging back in just before the cat i.e. merge it back in as late as possible. On IW setups there have been mixed results as I previously mentioned. I think the concensus is to go a quality bell mouth setup.

Edited by juggernaut1

So in the end much of a muchness and either should do the job?

I'm no expert, but this ^ is kinda what i've gleaned from this thread.

I have a 3071 56T .82 and love it. Not having had a 3076 or any other Garrett turbo i suppose it's easy to say that, however i don't think the differences in trim and comp wheel size are really worth fussing over *too* much.

(This all assumes that the rest of your setup is sorted)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know you don't want to hear this comment, but I can't not say it.  I just can't see 200kw being worth the time and effort. Its like guys with NA cars, putting in headers/exhaust/tune for a massive 20% jump in power. Great, the slow car is still slow and you're down $10,000.  My vote is leave it NA or price in a gearbox upgrade and shoot for at least 300KW, preferably 350KW+.  Now you have a NC that will try to kill you from time to time and will be exciting to drive
    • Ah yep. The main message I want to pass on is, try not to get scared of ghosts when thinking about knock/knock detection.  What I mean is, healthy engines make noise. Knock is also noise. Your knock sensor and ECU combo are trying to determine bad noise from good noise based on how loud the noise is. The factory knock sensors and ECU are not good at doing this.  Modern ECU's are pretty decent at it, however I'd still say that you would want to verify that if your ECU says it's knock, that you actually listen to it and confirm that it is correct.  Are you familiar with the plex knock monitor?  https://www.plex-tuning.com/products/plex-knock-monitor-v3/ I expect you're the type of person that would be very keen to play with something like this. It is great knock detection and you can pop some headphones on and listen to what's going on.  Knock that you've deliberately induced in low load low RPM areas is not really putting anything at risk and is a great tuning/learning/verification tool.  I just thought this was worth mentioning based on the way you were talking about setting up a base map and the Haltech base map settings. There are better ways to spend your time then chasing ghosts and worrying about detonation in scenarios that it is crazy unlikely to encounter it.  I was also wondering, what ECU are you planning to get? Will it be long til you pick it up?
    • This came quicker than I thought. It ain't even 2025 yet.
    • I somehow quoted my post instead of editing it. I regret nothing.
    • STOP GOOGLING FAB9 MAKE BORG WARNER EFR KITS FOR THE NC. THEY PACKAGE AN EFR 6758. DO NOTHING ELSE. CAPS INTENTIONAL. THE BEST RESPONSIVE SETUP EXISTS FOR YOUR CAR, AND HAS BEEN PROVEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW. IN B4 "BUT I WANT EVEN MORE RESPONSE, IN A SIMPLER, MORE RELIABLE PACKAGE" WHICH IS A LS.
×
×
  • Create New...