Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, so my question is,

What difference did you see from JUST adding an aftermarket intercooler?

Boost increase?

power increase?

lag increase?

better/worse drivability?

etc?

I have a 33 with basic mods but standard boost and while im not planning to go all out on power (spending the money on suspension and other instead) I did wonder if there would be much benifit alone from just wacking on a FMIC.

I know there is alot of BS and lack of knowledge about this stuff, so actual experiences and info please : )

thanks all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358469-what-happened-when-you-added-a-fmic/
Share on other sites

My experiance

GTT:

Slightly more lag, throttle response tad slower, small increase in power (before tune)

GTR:

Small increase in power (before tune)

I would go ahead and do it. If you've got all the stage 1 mods done, go ahead and get it tuned on the dyno and enjoy the ride thumbsup.gif

More lag, about 20-30Kw gain with standard ecu. Did alter drivability for me, only because before the FMIC was installed i was very happy with near instant spool with just pod and full turbo back exhaust.

GL

Boost increase?

power increase?

lag increase?

better/worse drivability?

For my R34 GTT with a 3" turboback exhaust - I didn't notice anything after fitting a Blitz return-flow - lag, power increase, boost increase, etc. All seemed about the same?

To be honest, the only real thing I did notice is that in summer I had less issuse with the car feeling sluggish on the really hot days?

if you go from std SMIC to FMIC and change nothing else

no power gain

loss in throttle response

slightly extra lag between open the throttle body and boost response

i cannot see any way you would GAIN power by changing the core size and adding more pipework at the same boost level

if you turn up the boost, tune it etc then yes youll make power, but just by chainging core and pipework = 0 rwkw gain

if you go from std SMIC to FMIC and change nothing else

no power gain

loss in throttle response

slightly extra lag between open the throttle body and boost response

i cannot see any way you would GAIN power by changing the core size and adding more pipework at the same boost level

if you turn up the boost, tune it etc then yes youll make power, but just by chainging core and pipework = 0 rwkw gain

So the dyno was lying? :blink:

EDIT: Just found this and it explains quite well.

"So, in a nutshell a front mount intercooler cooler upgrade will NOT make HP in your Supra, but it will free-up power that has been lost from inefficient intercoolers and most importantly it will maintain power for a longer period of time and reduce the chance of deadly detonation."

http://www.suprastore.com/dofronmounin.html

Edited by Shazza24

i went from 11psi + r34 smic + full exhaust + tune >> to 13psi + fmic + same exhaust + new tune.

it makes more power everywhere, and more consistantly than with the smic. throttle response suffers a bit, and you will notice it.

but for out and out WOT adventures, fmic feels better.

i noticed straight away more mid range torque, and a freed up top end. Also was consistently faster.. with the SMIC it would be ok if i hit it a few times but after that you could tell it was heat soaked.

I installed a Return flow fmic and noticed no difference in lag tbh.. Fuel economy was terrible though, 250km to a tank untuned, The smell the car made was nice though haha

pfffffftttt.... i noticed SFA difference when adding a front mount intercooler. the only thing that happened after i installed it was i then had piece of mind that i could safely turn the boost up or upgrade my turbo.

i've had 3 RB powered turbo cars now and done the FMIC upgrade on each of them and on each occasion there was no noticeable difference, no increase in lag, no increase in mid range or overall power, no decrease in response. though, if i kept telling my self there was a noticeable difference i'm sure i would start to believe it. after all, nobody wants to say that they spent $600-$1000 on a mod that has no noticeable effect.

a FMIC is in the same group of mods as bigger injectors and Z32 AFM's, while they don't add any power to your setup they support the ability to achieve more power with more boost, or a bigger/hiflow turbo.

Edited by QWK32

Disagree^

Reason being: I spent $800 expecting no difference, thinking I would have to wait until I had upped the boost before I saw anything change. So there was no placebo effect or post purchase dissonance at work here. On the other hand, the fact you haven't noticed anything across 3 cars maybe points towards you not being as in tune with your vehicles as others may be :)

Slightly laggier. This is to be expected with more pipework and a bigger core.

Slightly more power. Remember that intake charge temperatures are much more than ambient temperatures...consequently more exposure of the intake charge to ambient temperatures is going to be better at cooling it. A larger cooler core is also more robust to changes in heat. More consistent performance on a hot day thanks to things like this.

Dynos have shown differences between FMIC and side mounts on the same boost. Full benefits can't be seen until you up the ante, so don't expect a radical change in the way a car drives, but a front mount does make a difference straight up.

Disagree^

Reason being: I spent $800 expecting no difference, thinking I would have to wait until I had upped the boost before I saw anything change. So there was no placebo effect or post purchase dissonance at work here. On the other hand, the fact you haven't noticed anything across 3 cars maybe points towards you not being as in tune with your vehicles as others may be :)

Slightly laggier. This is to be expected with more pipework and a bigger core.

Slightly more power. Remember that intake charge temperatures are much more than ambient temperatures...consequently more exposure of the intake charge to ambient temperatures is going to be better at cooling it. A larger cooler core is also more robust to changes in heat. More consistent performance on a hot day thanks to things like this.

Dynos have shown differences between FMIC and side mounts on the same boost. Full benefits can't be seen until you up the ante, so don't expect a radical change in the way a car drives, but a front mount does make a difference straight up.

i'm not disagreeing with the fact that a FMIC will help maintain a more consistent performance well after the stock side mount has succumb to heat soak. but that isn't an increase in power, its the normal expected power being maintained, were as with the stock side mount you may experience a decrease in power on those particularly hot days, after a bit of spirited driving, or have reached the limits of the stock setup.

one thing that does happen, and i have heard/seen plenty of comments about it, is that after installing a front mount an increase in standard boost by a couple of PSI can occur. that could be playing a part in some people's experience of more power after installing FMIC, especially if your not running an aftermarket boost gauge and can see the increase in turbo pressure.

Well I just got a Just Jap return flow FMIC (the black one) installed & didn't really notice anything different compared to before. Car felt more powerful but that is probably just in my head :rolleyes:.

On a related topic, does the additional of a FMIC warrant a re-tune?

I had a SAFC 2 tuned for my old set-up (which consists of turbo back exhaust, R34 SMIC, 10Psi boost Tee & POD), now that I have replaced the R34 SMIC with a FMIC, do I need to get it re-tuned again? Or would my old tune be sufficient for the time being?

Keen on putting the car on a dyno again to see if there is any difference compared to last time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh and my rear arms may need some attention too.    
    • Bushings are almost done. Check the date stamp 😂 these are likely the original bushings with 27 years and 243ks on them.     Was too dark to get a pic of the worst one.
    • Porous blocks are a known issue on something like a Porsche M96, it's not really something I've ever heard of on an RB26. It's possible what people thought was a "porous block" was really a cracked block that they just didn't spot the crack on.
    • This is a controversial subject really, the whole power vs fun thing I mean And this is the main reason I got back into a MX5 Of the last few notable daily cars I've owned whilst I have frequented SAU R33 GTS-t: fun, but because I'm a idiot I modified well past a reliable fun car and ended up hating it, although that was my fault because I tried to have a daily cruiser and race car all in one, the family called it the sometimes car, because sometimes it was working, sometimes it was broken, gladly sold it NB MX5: brilliant car, thrashed the Bejebus out of it, but, again, was stupid and deleted the air con, power steering and stripped the interior out, whilst still fun, and reliable, and super cheap on consumables, it was not a fun place to be going on long cruises, I did love it, but basically every family member hated going anywhere in it, sadly sold it 2015 WRX STI: soulless thing that looked like your average Kia sedan and had that horrible boxer engine with glass ringlands, the family did like it though, that thing was one of my stupidest purchases and I still regret it 2017 Toyota 86: 😪 if I didn't crash it, I would probably still have it, it was a fun little thing, even with that horrible boxer engine, the family did like it, the only reason I didn't get another 86, or, BRZ was the boxer engine, I should have learnt after owning the STI, but I'm a idiot VX SS: great cruiser, fits the whole family, and was fast as.....in a straight line, but a big fat thing, so no enjoyment throwing it around corners, the family was unimpressed with the whole boganness of if, but they did admit it was a comfy place to sit on long cruises As for the NC, I feel it is perfect for what I want, or need out of of a car, whether I'm cruising the Hwy, back roads, twisties or peak hour traffic, the Mrs doesn't mind driving it either, or cruising in it as well, although she does bump her head of the roof nearly every time she gets in, which is farking hilarious, and the kids love taking it for a thrash as well So basically, I've had constantly more fun, and way less headache and heartache, both on the track and on the street, in low powered cars,  go figure.....LOL One thing though, the Mrs has stated that the cams have made the exhaust sound much louder, which they have, but it doesn't bother me, in fact, I actually like it, but, to negate any future comments from the Minister for War and Finances I may look at some changes to the rear muffler set-up to drop the volume down a tad to appease her when we are out and about in it
    • You will need to extend the turbo inlet pipe somehow, which could/might be done with silicone/rubber pipe, but might need steelwork, depending on your intake. And you will need to change the pipework on the outlet in teh same way, but this is more likely to need steelwork.
×
×
  • Create New...