Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb26 Oil Pump Choices


djr81
 Share

Recommended Posts

cany find real info mation on this damn round about of a way site you wanna know my experience PM me all ill tell you REAL life engine touching blowing up fixing INFO

My head hurts when I try to read this!

On topic though...

The other benefit worth considering is that it takes longer to heat up a larger oil capacity. This is useful for sprints where your at consistantly high rpm and not necessarily getting a lot of airflow. Its been my experience that cooling systems dont work well until your above 80km/h (and in a tall gear, not in 2nd and 7000+ RPM, at full load). Below 80 your cooling is predominatly fan derived.

Im with Steveo with the higher flow and smaller restrictor option too. I like the idea that my bearings area getting plenty of oil flow to keep them cool. I also like that 7 litres of oil stays cleaner for longer compared to a smaller pump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of 2 guys both using n1 pumps and over filled there sumps by 1 litre and still managed to smash there pumps. If money is not a concern I would go for the tomei pump for peace of mind as it has been proven that they can take alot more punishment and being based on a 2jz style of pump you don't hear of them having any problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the failed N1 pumps I have seen are accompanied by an equally failed harmonic balancer. At 8000rpm, if you have even the slightest harmonic imbalance, you are going to hammer the living f**k out of that gear. They get larger, they cease to fit in the round hole they are designed to turn in and they start to grab, then they crack or break.

I have seen many people successfully run N1 pumps and standard capacity sumps at the track and not have a problem. I have seen guys with Tomei pumps at the track have problems. It works both ways and it's not always about having the absolute most oil flow you can possibly imagine and all your problems will just waft away. The fact is, the N1 pump flows enough to cope with any amateur type racing events, but is your oil up to the task?

If you are going to run the N1 pump, make sure you are using an extremely high pressure resistant oil that has a film strength higher than any other oil on the market - Royal Purple

It never hurts to have a larger sump capacity and it never hurts to have more flow, at the end of the day, fuel and oil are two of the most important things you need. Who really cares about cost? Another engine rebuild is going to cost you a frig load more.

Another fact is that the materials used to make the Nitto and Tomei pumps are much stronger than the material used to make the N1. They WILL handle more punishment and not break. They have a longer fatigue life due to the material they are made from.

It's the same as the forged conrod argumement - yes the factory rod can handle a shit tonne of hp, no it will not last forever. The fatigue life of a forged rod is much much much longer than the factory rod, and for $600-$800 for a set, why would you stuff around putting old (possibly tired) parts back into your new engine?

If it were me, and I was going to spend 2-3 days a year at the track and 80% of the time it will be a daily, I would leave the sump and put on the N1 pump. If I was going to be spending a day every 4-6 weeks at the track, I would invest the money into a Nitto item. They aren't that expensive and will take a hammering for years :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and +1 on overfilling the sump slightly (0.5 - 1L) at track events. But make sure you have a good catch can setup and check it every 5 laps or so if you can. You'll get to know what your car can handle once you have spent some time out and about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously with added oil/larger sump the oil temps and similar are beneficial to the cause depending on use.

Snowman & Scotsman both ran stock sump'd GTR's for 2-3 years no problems in that department. Motors were stock too and eventually the died but that's what happens @ 330-360rwkw over a hard life. Since then they've both used N1 pumps, as have pretty much all Vic cars. Not one has broken a pump yet. Most motors hand together fine as well (failures are not pump related).

So if you are a bit worried then swap out the gearset. They aren't too expensive and if you get piece of mind then that's covered off.

Comes down to cost really:

Option 1 - 1500 Closer to $750 if savvy Billet gears from JPC.com.au $350 can be used

Option 1.5 - 2300

Option 2 - 3200-3500

I'd also suggest if you are going to go all out on a pump, that you use the Tomei one. It's the only one that utilises a different gearset arrangement similar to that of the 2JZ (never hear of them breaking pumps). It's something I've never really worked out why the other aftermarket pump makers don't use the Tomei/2J style as for a bolt-on pump, it's the way to go.

Thank you R31 Nismoid for the answer above its a very valuable and credable answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would invest the money into a Nitto item.

Well said mate. The Nitto will save you the additional expense of having to pull your engine later when the other pump dies. Its the only pump on the market that has not suffered gear failure and each pump is assembled/clearanced checked by the engineer who designed it not some monkey on an assembly line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can get a tomei pump out of japan for freakin 1400bux these days, why would you even waste the time on a N1, i mean, you have already spent 6-9k on parts, machining costs, the time pulling it all out, whats the big deal with the extra bit of coin. its not really that much when you think of it, and when it comes down to it, its the rb's weakest link, so why not just put down alil more cash for peace of mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the failed N1 pumps I have seen are accompanied by an equally failed harmonic balancer. At 8000rpm, if you have even the slightest harmonic imbalance, you are going to hammer the living f**k out of that gear. They get larger, they cease to fit in the round hole they are designed to turn in and they start to grab, then they crack or break.

This man speaks the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you explicity excluded the dry sump option but it's worth considering an external oil pump with wet sump. Cost effective, and you can avoid the ^^ guys getting emotional over your oil pump choice.

People just spout a lot of what workshops feed them without knowing any better.

This made me laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nitto pump and collar, tomei sump baffles and an accusump... would have to be the best set up for the money and ease of fittment....

Otherwise, add a sump extension with pickup.

I wouldn't piss about with an N1 pump on a built engine... Saying that, I have an N1 pump (with no collar) on my thrasher rb25 and have had no problems yet- I do have an ATI ballencer though.

I'm not a massive fan of external oil pumps... the only thing that stops total failure is a thin little belt, with little or no guard...

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pharkk, this turned into a pile of less than helpful vitriol.

The point of the thread was to get some determination on the relative merits of flow rates & sump volumes not to get all the monkeys chucking sh!t at each other.

I don’t want the worlds greatest anything for the sake of having it. It’s like having the worlds hardest clutch which will last forever but destroy three gearboxes during its life. Useless. The point is to get a well balanced set up that works harmoniously over the life of the motor which will, eventually, end up dead. Like they all do.

So far to the best of my understanding:

A stock pump will flow 47litres/minute at 6000rpm.

Various aftermarket pumps have claims to have greater flow rates.

The Tomei pump claims to be 20% higher in volume. To be honest I am not that enamoured with the three piece design.

The Jun pump is claimed to be 25% higher in volume.

The Nitto pump (going on their published figures) is 40% over stock however their number for the standard pump flow rate is lower than the one quoted everywhere else.

The downside of a higher flow rate is the need to have a much bigger sump volume, the knock on effects to the head in terms of getting rid of the oil, the pumping losses, the longer period needed to get the greater volume of oil up to a decent temperature.

The upside is it may give you better bearing life longer assuming you don’t get pump cavitation issues.

Oh and lastly there is nothing wrong with sintered metal. It is just a process used to form steel. Hell BMW used to use it for conrods.

Anyway if anyone can help out by way of confirming the Nitto Flow rates I would be grateful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean this data from the website:

http://www.nitto.com.au/products/oilpump-RB.html?category=engineblock

Jun pump data is here:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/jun-high-flow-oil-pump-rb26dett-rb20det-rb25det-16702

Tomei information seems to be all over the place.

Data varies from 56-57 lt/min at 6000 or 7000 rpm depending on what supplier website your looking at.

Or were you chasing actual test data performed by an independant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean this data from the website:

http://www.nitto.com.au/products/oilpump-RB.html?category=engineblock

Jun pump data is here:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/jun-high-flow-oil-pump-rb26dett-rb20det-rb25det-16702

Tomei information seems to be all over the place.

Data varies from 56-57 lt/min at 6000 or 7000 rpm depending on what supplier website your looking at.

Or were you chasing actual test data performed by an independant?

The data for Tomei was on volume 22 of new release information from Tomei in Seppoland. Put the flow rate for a stocker at 6000rpm at 47L/min & the Tomei pump at 56L/min.

I wasnt necessarilly looking for independent data just confirmation or otherwise of the Nitto flow rates as the listings they use for stock pumps is at a variance to everyone elses.

Edited by djr81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd also suggest if you are going to go all out on a pump, that you use the Tomei one. It's the only one that utilises a different gearset arrangement similar to that of the 2JZ (never hear of them breaking pumps). It's something I've never really worked out why the other aftermarket pump makers don't use the Tomei/2J style as for a bolt-on pump, it's the way to go.

I wouldn't say the tomei pump uses a gear arrangement similar to the 2JZ style pump? 2jZ pump has a splined gear on the crank, driving the oil pump gear. the tomei pump as a 2 piece inner gear but it still uses the same 2 small flats to drive the pump gear just like any other 26 pump which is the weak point. the gears 'teeth' are slightly different but they are still a gerotor type pump just with much bigger gears with a more suitable material. they are unique in the 2 piece inner gear set-up but still no where near as good as a 2JZ pump. the best option for RB26 is still getting a set of splined gears made up with the inner gear permanently fixed to the crank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...